Frequencies secret treasure metal

[hamze2000]

Hello to all. Dear teachers Does anyone know the frequency you are using confidential metals in lrl. Would help me so I could have the frequencies for the test. Thanks

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by hamze2000

Hello to all. Dear teachers Does anyone know the frequency you are using confidential metals in lrl. Would help me so I could have the frequencies for the test. Thanks

There is no definitive list of frequencies. Every manufacturer uses something different, and no-one is in agreement.

So, you need to ask yourself one question ... why is this?

[Geo]

Some frequences are better than other for the working of a LRL. But i think that there is not a frequency only for a metal except the NMR frequences

[hamze2000]

Thanks, from your description., I need a list of the best and highly Frkansh for lrl I'm looking into them. Grateful if you'll be my guide

[Geo]

What type is your lrl???

[hamze2000]

We have created a detector that works on the molecular motion of long waves and short waves through the send. Means the use of two types of long and short wave...

[rider]

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/17/msvt.jpg/

[hamze2000]

Originally Posted by rider

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/17/msvt.jpg/

Thanks

[hamze2000]

Hello to all teachers.
After several attempts I was able to find the frequency of treasure and treasure my friends and I will be here for another use., If someone has access to please the frequencies to help me. Thanks
treasure1 fre=2740

[kaligula]

I dont think that this is the real frequency. Try the harmonic of this at 5480 or 10960 and you'll have the same result. I'm interested where you are from. And that factor is very important for frequency.

[hamze2000]

Hello. 10960 Hz is better for you., I tried so to obtain frequencies., I need your help

[hamze2000]

My point is whether it is better to 10,960 Hz

[kaligula]

I dont know where are you from, and that is big reason for right frequency. So if you can to try all the frequencies from 4.5 to 6 KHz with step 5 HZ. Im doing it with dowsing rods and bealive me if you have inafe expirience with dowsing rods or maybe your locator you ll see the diference from hertz to hertz. Im still experimenting with frequencies. and its matter to find right frequency to not dig empty holes

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by kaligula

I dont know where are you from, and that is big reason for right frequency. So if you can to try all the frequencies from 4.5 to 6 KHz with step 5 HZ. Im doing it with dowsing rods and bealive me if you have inafe expirience with dowsing rods or maybe your locator you ll see the diference from hertz to hertz. Im still experimenting with frequencies. and its matter to find right frequency to not dig empty holes

If you're using dowsing rods, then you don't need any special frequencies. You will still dig the same number of empty holes.

[kaligula]

So tell me one device that really works
Maybe Carl from Geotech has right

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by kaligula

So tell me one device that really works
Maybe Carl from Geotech has right

Hmmm ... let me consult my list of known working LRLs.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Unfortunately the page appears to be blank.

[kaligula]

sorry, what is the name of this forum???

If there is no LRL that works than why this forum exist???

[Carl-NC]

Originally Posted by kaligula

sorry, what is the name of this forum???

If there is no LRL that works than why this forum exist???

If this forum didn't exist, where would you be able to learn that LRLs don't work?

[hamze2000]

Hello to all.
We have some specific frequencies such as the frequency of human teeth, we can find the grave of a human cadaver

[kaligula]

Originally Posted by hamze2000

Hello. 10960 Hz is better for you., I tried so to obtain frequencies., I need your help

HAMZE2000, plz dont let to disapoint you on this forum. Thay dont belive that nothing of this works, but you have the right to try by yourself and to proof to you is it true or is not. Plz try that what i told you and we ll speak again

Everyone has right to bealive in his own trouth

[hamze2000]

You are right. Fkrans from 20hz to 2000hz I need to build a modern detector.
Thank you so much

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by kaligula

HAMZE2000, plz dont let to disapoint you on this forum. Thay dont belive that nothing of this works, but you have the right to try by yourself and to proof to you is it true or is not. Plz try that what i told you and we ll speak again

Everyone has right to bealive in his own trouth

This is what I keep telling everyone.
Instead of continuously asking for an LRL that works, try doing the experiments yourself. Otherwise we have the "these things don't work" versus "yes they do" arguments ad infinitum.

It's up to you to come to your own conclusions. But be careful; the human mind is very good at self-deception. If the results are not totally conclusive, then you must use double-blind testing to remove any conscious or unconscious bias.

[kaligula]

Yes, we have the.same opinion about this. With experimenting with different frequencies something is happening definitely, but as you say big problem may be self suggestive factor. I can easy find ring if you put it in the ground, but I haven't still find old burried treasure. Other problem is when you find some point you dont know how deep you have to dig. So. I thing this lrl will work best in combination with some good deep seeking metal detektor, or with true documents and maps

[kaligula]

And I want say one more thing. The Romans had tones and tones of gold. How thay were able to find golden veins or thay were digging on lucky?

[detectoman]

este podria ser el grupo de los ae alquimistas electronicos
this must be named the alchemist eloctronician group- ae, never are reveled the obtain succes
this due a difficultous lrl operation, variable climate change conditions and solar activity arruin the past work