|
|
#1
06-06-2013, 01:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
My new KING LRL V 4.1
Hi all
This is my new project for LRL This is the penultimate version of the LRL. Is the KING LRL V 4.1 First video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo7HZa7guIk#! Second video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kPuEIh7nsA Show good for all And waiting for your moral support Cordially Nicola 
|
|
#2
06-06-2013, 02:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
It looks very nice , but i think it will be very important that you show how it works on the field, cause we have heard a lot of LRL detectors, but unfortunally there are minimum feedback about field detection to convience us that a device really works has supose to work.
I have OBMD 2 from Crypton and also PDK under experiment and both show that does the job. So far, Crypton is the best, cause it has more sensitivity and stability. Regards Nelson Quote:
|
|
#3
06-06-2013, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Admittedly it really produces acceptable frequencies, So what? How it works? Swiveling handle? something similar to Rangertell Examiner or Lectrasearch or even like L-rods in MFDs or …... No new thing, at all. It is not considerable unless shows a demonstrable field tests.
|
|
#4
06-06-2013, 06:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you to all
Who agree or disagree We will put practical and demonstration videos and some find This type of LRL is not like any other and we are quite in that people think. And I know my colleague Andreas engineer and discuss together the know-how ... it is always objectionable before .. but now I think he's succeeded .. And for Morgan good luck my friend Andreas To follow my colleagues ..........see you soon Nicola
|
|
#5
06-06-2013, 06:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Hi dear micheal Look this attached can help you how this Type LRL work  This is different to what you think, my dear Michael. 'Cause this type of LRL displays only the frequency of metals found non-another ... or other interference dear connoisseur PIC and programming .... But wait my practical videos soon Nicolas
|
|
#6
06-07-2013, 04:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
to administrator
It would be nice to limit the size of the pictures. They are so big its a waste. They need to be max screen size. Less is preferable.
Goldfinder
|
|
#7
06-07-2013, 05:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
H Goldfinder I m so sorry for that maybe the news topic. I can't change or edit now my topic Thank for this attention Cordially my dear Nicolas
|
|
#9
06-08-2013, 03:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
ThThis device uses the NMR system  You can look this site for ideas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_magnetic_resonance
|
|
#11
06-09-2013, 03:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I not understand what you mean my friend sorry but you can reply with other mode or explain me good Nicolas
|
|
#14
06-10-2013, 09:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will like to see a good video showing what this detector can do?
In advance manty thanks Nelson Quote:
|
|
#15
06-15-2013, 12:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hi Nelson Yes, we are working on it now, especially for the second version of the fourth generation For a fitter in its version of the first generation, second and third There are some assets and his way of working You can look my chanel in youtube http://www.youtube.com/user/nicola22655 ِCordially
|
|
#17
06-19-2013, 07:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"" How No, this is not the case.? "" I know you. First Against for doising Now and Against NMR and You're a physicist !!!!!!! It's funny dear Carl. Back then it Is to studies. I remember you only this: The principle of NMR usually involves two sequential steps:
Cordially Nicolas
|
|
#18
06-19-2013, 11:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's gotta be the worst LRL movie I've ever seen. Absolutely awful, I can write funny numbers on a piece of paper with a pencil faster than that, and I'm smart enough not to waste anyone's time posting a YouTube video so they can watch me do it, you'll just have to take my word for it! .....There is a logic to it however, and that's the principle in marketing of "qualifying the customer". In the case of selling an LRL, you want the customer to be someone who has already demonstrated their willingness to be abused and lied to, so that after they've bought the damn thing and it doesn't do anything useful whatsoever other than to serve as a funny toy, the customer will not go public with bad publicity.
And Nick, if what you were doing was NMR, you would not be posting about it here in an LRL forum, you'd be posting in a geophysics forum! What you are doing is not NMR and everyone knows it including you, therefore if you post in a geophysics forum saying your gadget is NMR you will be thrown out as a fraudster. This is an LRL forum, which means here we accept that the discussion is about fraudulent apparatus, you don't get thrown out for posting about LRL's. Locating apparatus that actually works on scientific principles is NEVER called "LRL"-- the designation "LRL" is used only for fraudulent locating apparatus. You can search the entire history of this forum and not once has anyone developed an electronic locating apparatus that actually works and posted here describing it as an "LRL". If that's not enough, you can check out the LRL forum on Treasurenet and it's the same story-- apparatus that isn't fraudulent is NEVER referred to as "LRL". Therefore your funny little post about the two things that NMR is, is irrelevant (although from a technical perspective you have described what your gadget is not, just as Carl said.) What's relevant is that you have come to an LRL forum to talk about NMR, getting mad at people who know what NMR actually is and can call you out on your BS. At least here, everyone (including yourself) agrees that what you have is in the category of "LRL", that's why this is for you the logical place to be posting. You old-timers, this whole thing is another example of "read the advertisement!" Nick is advertising an LRL, and his own actions and words have revealed that the damn thing is a fraud. If you're in denial, send him a private email and ask him how much he'll sell it to you for. If you buy it, Nick will get a good deal, and you will get what you deserve. --Dave J.
|
|
#19
06-19-2013, 12:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thank you but I prefer not answer and I not would making marketing dear Dave .j because I have my forum and the price is 4500 $ .I have nothing to hide and not fraude it I sold more than twenty is I not problem dear friends and also the people know what this type of king if you not know I accept criticism but if you do not know what. It's your problem why you are the best? and laugh at us Arabs but we also know we do dear sir scholar Cordially Nicolas
|
|
#21
06-19-2013, 01:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yes If not believe you can answer or find that it not hide my friend Qiaozhi and no one forces you to buy this doising fraud if you dont like it only we see you insult people http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?15566-New-Detector-quot-Nokta-quot-DPR!!!!&p=92891#post9289 and you are selling Pd with your friend Carl .It is that you do not accept our Lrl http://www.longrangelocators.com/for...ad.php?t=18794 Cordially
|
|
#22
06-19-2013, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Okay, I guess nobody has to send Nick a private email to find out the price tag after all. It's $4500.
If someone is so rich that they can spend $4500 on something without even first finding out what the heck it is, they obviously don't need the money. So Nick may as well have their $4500. If someone actually does a little research and after finding out what it is they still want it, that kind of behavior should be punished and Nick has already told them what the fine is. $4500, and Nick may as well be the one to collect the money. --Dave J.
|
|
#23
06-19-2013, 05:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
ATARI strikes back
Hey folks! Lunch break in the middle of a busy day. Time to read the comics and wow...
Is it true Nick? carlie and ozzy georgie are selling their Atari that makes funny noises as a working LRL?  So, the book sales were not enough to help pay the rent... sad news. Don't listen to wharfie above Nick. You sold much more LRLs than he did with his useless floor polishers. And $ 4,500 is a good price. Actually a bargain compared to $ 35,000 that JPlayer will pay for my Tubedec A-9000. Time to go. See you around.
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
|
|
#24
06-19-2013, 05:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Secondly, I do not see any insults in your link that were made by myself. Thirdly, you have obviously not read the book. If you had, you would understand that Carl and I are not selling any type of PD. The design (TOTeM) in Chapter 14 of the book is presented as an experimental concept. There is no guarantee of success, and I quote: The purpose of this design is to develop a 'working' experimental platform for anyone wishing to investigate this grey area of metal detecting. This is a highly speculative area of research, and there is absolutely no guarantee of success. Remember - here there be dragons!" The only cost involved is the price of the book (which covers many other aspects of conventional metal detecting) at $34.95, and some minor cost of components and a little time. In my opinion, this is time and money that is well worth investing, especially if you are at all unclear about the technology. The alternative is to get an expensive LRL education by spending $4500, and possibly learning nothing in the process. Last edited by Qiaozhi; 06-20-2013 at 05:52 PM.
|
|
#25
06-19-2013, 05:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
