|
|
#1
07-06-2012, 01:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Higgs' Boson Fraud
I've heard the news and I knew that it would be just some more time for CERN to make up something about the 'particle of God' to justify the billions from the European tax payers spent in CERN's wildest utopia.
Europe faces a serious economic crisis and they needed something to diverge from tension. I have once stated that there is no Higg's Boson, no 'particle of God' or Big Bang. This is silly. There are many scientists right now refuting Cern's claim. Why? I think it would be good to read what Dr. Evans has to say about it. http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/20...of-scientists/ His Injunction against Wind Turbine Proposals http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/20...e-proposals-2/ How many ways to fill 19 parameters as you like? Or... how many ways to stuff 19 sausages for Sunday's lunch?
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths" 
|
|
#2
07-06-2012, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Although I very much doubt David Cameron understood a word Dr. Evans said. 
|
|
#3
07-06-2012, 01:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If they did saw God to appear or not, we will find out sooner or later.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#4
07-06-2012, 11:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What scientists? Scientists like Dr. hung? Or Dr. Evans? Hahaahahaaaa.... Isn't Myron Evans the the unemployed physicist whose publications were removed from the record when it was discovered that he submitted fraudulent mathematical formulas as proof? Isn't he the one who asked other scientists to help him get nominated for a Nobel prize while ignoring the gross errors in his math and ignoring his failed attempts to prove any of his theories? Wasn't Evans caught fraudulently assuming British government titles to trick people into thinking he had authority which he did not have? Why does the majority of the scientific community call Myron Evans a crackpot, quack and fraud? Is it because his his attempts to demonstrate he can extract free energy from a vacuum have all failed? Or is it because of his claim of solving the problem of the Unified Field Theory was found fraudulent, when they learned he supported his claim by using math errors? It is a fact that Myron Evans used fake math to try to convince other scientists he solved the Unified Field Theory and also discovered the way to produce free energy from a vacuum. And when his colleagues discovered the fraud and his math errors, they also removed all his publications from the scientific records, and banned him from submitting further frauds to the scientific community. This is the reason why we see none of his bogus theories published in the scientific community... His fake theories are published only on his own website and websites of some of his followers. It appears Dr. hung learned his science from "great scientific scholars" that he respects such as Tom Bearden, Bruce Cathie, John Hutchinson, Myron Evans, and others of this same caliber. Isn't it interesting... none of these people will demonstrate their theories working in front of skeptical witnesses to see if they really work. Instead of proving they know what they are talking about, and showing us free energy from a vacuum, they attack other scientists who are actually building things and conducting experiments that work. Isn't this is the same method Hung uses? Doesn't he like to talk of his accomplishments pioneering the LRL field without ever demonstrating any of his accomplishments or apparatus working where people can verify it? Is it any wonder why hung clings to these people for pseudo-scientific support (and perhaps moral support)? I think Cern has some very expensive science facilities. Their facilities seem to be not only expensive, but some of the best science facilities in Europe. And I am happy to see that the people of Europe believe it is important enough to spend the money to explore in their attempt to find real evidence and facts to answer these vital questions of physics. Otherwise Cern would be a joke, like other fake scientists who conduct no experiments, and make up fake math to try to trick people into believing they have the answers. Errrr... Dr. hung.... were you able to find 19 sausages to take on your Sunday lunch?  Best Wishes, J_P
|
|
#6
07-07-2012, 12:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There is no way that with 19 adjustable parameters CERN can state that they found what they think they found. Remember their claim of faster than light neutrinos later rectified. Also there's the Klein Gordon equation erroneously pointing to massive spin zero particles. Dr. Evans talks about it and make comments on something I have always stated here and in the TNET forum. How scientists made a lot of wrong conclusions along time without the Academia caring to make revisions. This ended having people with a lot of wrong scientific concepts. Science is one and only. But many scientists fail in their comprehension. "Comay claims that there is a basic self contradiction in the Klein Gordon equation, which is the basis for the claim to the existence of massive spin zero particles. These cannot exist due to this contradiction. See for example E. Comay, Apeiron vol. 11(3), (2004). Dirac also heavily criticised the theory leading to the “Higgs boson”. As far as I know CERN has failed to respond to Comay except to try to dismiss him. Some parts of CERN are well aware of the ECE work, and know perfectly well that the Higss boson does not exist because it is based on 19 – 26 adjustable parameters and a ridculously flawed basic theory. This was discussed at the July 4th meeting here, where no one accepted the announcement by CERN made the same day. So it is clear that modern standard physics is a propaganda machine (wikipedia outlet) that seeks to suppress criticism, and fails completely in all that it does. This is not physics at all, so should not be funded at all. Other parts of CERN may produce good work, but again, the strident, careless claim to faster than c motion has been refuted. The fatal weakness of the subject is that people never go into the basics, so layer after layer of pure nonsense is built up, until hyper hysterical clams to have discovered the god particle are screeched across the globe. This is exactly what Bacon warned against, and no one should accept it as physics. I find it grossly offensive adn very suspicious. This claim is being made in order to ask for more billions at a time when European contries are bankrupt. Nothing could be more irresponsible."
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
|
|
#7
07-07-2012, 08:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
