#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
Ubuntu Linux
This topic originally started within Tinkerer's PI Project, and has been moved here.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
You can download Ubuntu from here -> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download
Both Ubuntu 9.04 Desktop or Ubuntu 8.04 LTS are available. The LTS (long term support) is the most stable one. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I recommend Ubuntu Linux if you have had problems with other versions of Linux. It is designed to be easier to install than the others, and to be more user friendly. All Linux versions I have used are much faster than Windows. Ubuntu V9.04 is a big improvement over v8.04 for a lot of reasons. See here: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=707
If you are using two HDs, you may want to install Ubuntu in the manner I did. I cleaned the spare data disk of all downloads and data files and moved them to the Windows disk. Then I installed Linux on the empty disk with no partitions. When the install was done, I set up the computer bios to boot from the Linux disk. When I boot, Linux knows there is a Windows disk on the computer, and it presents a 15 second screen with a menu that allows me to choose to boot into Linux or Windows. If I don't choose, then it defaults to boot in Linux. This allows me to use Windows on the occasions when I need a Windows program. After installing Linux, I copied my data to the Linux disk, and kept a copy on the Windows disk as a backup for files I did not want to lose in case something happens to the Linux disk. You will find that when you are running Linux, you have access to all the files on the Windows disk in case you want to copy, move or delete things from there. I use Linux more than 90% of the time because it is faster. But I still have Windows on the other HD for a backup. Best wishes, J_P |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I recommend Pardus. It is one of the fastest developing Linux distros. Even Ubuntu is porting some of the features of Pardus for next releases.
http://www.uludag.org.tr/eng/download.html http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=pardus Pardus (scientific name for Anatolian leopard) is a Turkish Linux distribution started and developed by the Scientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK). Ensuring that it is an operating system which can be installed and used more easily than the existing distros as well as other competitive operating systems is one of Pardus' main goals. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Personally I use Ubuntu Linux on my laptop and Windows on the desktop machine. If I need to use a Windows program on my laptop, that will not run directly using WINE, then I start VirtualBox and run XP in a virtual machine. This enables me to run two operating systems at the same time, without having to dual-boot.
There are many Linux distributions available, and you will probably get many different recommendations, but Ubuntu Linux is without doubt the most popular and easy to use. You can even buy machines from Dell Computers pre-loaded with Ubuntu. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
and what about Knoppix ?
Why don't use a live cd or live dvd ? E.g. knoppix live is a good solution for the simple average user... just reboot computer and let it load from cd or dvd: that's all.
No installation, no mess... then you'll have full internet access, full device auto-detection etc Everything to post stuff or surf easy... PS: knoppix is debian-based... so think about... Kind regards, Max
__________________
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim... But we dont need a reason " someone said... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Most versions of Linux require a computer geek to get properly installed and to keep updated. I would recommend these versions to programmers and people who maintain apache servers, because they can modify the operating system files using C to customize their personal distribution. But for most common users who want to browse the internet and use their computer the way they use Windows, There is nothing more easy than Ubuntu as a substitute for Windows. There is very little learning curve needed. Ubuntu Linux is much faster and efficient than Windows, it has an update every 6 months, auto notifications for updates, and it is all free. Other versions require you to figure out which add-on packages to add, and you usually must do this manually using command lines. Ubuntu can be updated in a manner similar to Windows. What's nice is your browser is immune to most of the viruses that attack Windows, so minimal OS protection needed. This keeps things fast. Best wishes, J_P |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That's why maybe I don't like Ubuntu... I don't like simple things...that's why I'm focused... on Gomer...ops Dell at now! Complex case... Kind regards, Max
__________________
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim... But we dont need a reason " someone said... |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I discovered at the beginning of this year that there is a Linux version of AVG. Consequently I downloaded a copy and ran a complete virus check of my system. Guess what? After more than a year of running Ubuntu on my laptop, the system was completely virus-free. Compare that to Windoze. On average it takes only 12 minutes to contract a virus, if you don't have anti-virus software.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"...On average it takes only 12 minutes to contract a virus, if you don't have anti-virus software...."
Oh man! Than my XP system is nest of all possible viruses! I dont have antivirus software installed all the time cose it slows down much. Also i do not worry to much on that. The hell..if something goes wrong it will take only 2 hours to format hard disk and reinstall all the needed soft again. My docs and works were already backuped regullary on CD's...so? Why worry? Most easiest way to catch virus is to surf along "unknown" and unchecked sites, usually unofficial and private servers. So...having same old habits to visit only proven and already checked places will reduce chances to infect own system. Ain't not that good antivirus software to protect your pc anyway. Recently i tested Ubuntu. Not bad at all! I like it! Problem is cose i am very dependent on some software which runs only on Win. Until those appears under Linux.... But also live CD is very good solution. There are also some memory stick (flash) versions too.
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I also like some Windows software that will not run on Linux. This is why I kept a second Windows disk on my websurfing computer. The solution of using CDs and flash memory to save data also works, but you are limited in the size of the CD or flash memory. Another solution is to buy a spare hard disk to store data, These are inexpensive, and the data disk can be used by the Linux disk or the Windows disk for most of the files you save on it. You can also keep this data disk separated from the computer until you need to see the saved data, by using a USB drive hard disk that you plug in when you want to use it. USB hard disks can be plugged into the computer and removed while Windows or Linux is running. Another solution is to run a program called WINE in Linux, that will let you run Windows software. This WINE program uses Linux resources to emulate Windows. This will slow down Linux a little, but not nearly as bad as running plain Windows with all the security updates and virus protection. Whatever solution you use, you will find that your browser always runs faster under Linux. Not a little faster... a lot faster. Best wishes, J_P |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I believe most adware, spyware and other malware is written to attack Windows because this is the OS that most people use online. Windows OS is also written in a way that has many holes for hackers to explore compared to Linux. I think this condition exists because of Bill Gates early attempts to make Windows incompatible with any other software by adding all kinds of unneeded software and proprietary code, and OS instructions that were designed to make the OS ready for many different intended uses. In Linux, everything is open source, so we have the whole world full of programmers who find the vulnerabilities, and continually re-write the code to be very difficult for hackers to get past. It looks like very tight clean code to me, that gets the job done with minimal unnecessary overhead. The user is free to install more "add on" software packages as he sees fit for his particular situation. ie: you can add on audio production packages, or design/cad packages, video application packages, etc, without being stuck with unneeded memory-sucking sortware that is part of the OS. And these packages are all written for Linux, and mostly open source. This seems too good to be true for a free OS. But it is! Best wishes, J_P |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Hi all,
I have been following this thread with interest. What would be your advice to install unbutu if you have only one HD and windows installed, wanting to keep it of course ? Thanks, Fred. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
What is the specification of your PC?
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It is actually a translation layer that allows Windows applications to run on Linux. The programs run as fast as they do on Windows, although some programs will not run with WINE. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Qiaozhi, how about XT Turbo 4/10MHz, 32Mb hard disk and 5.25" floppy and Hercules graphic??? Any chance Bubuntu will work on that platform???
Oh yes! Also have Hayes Hidden modem 1200 baudrate...
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
A fast Pc :q6600 with 4g of memory etc.
At work a P4 3ghz. Maybe a laptop too? |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In a few years worth a fortune on ebay |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I once installed Ubuntu on a PC that had Windows XP home installed on a single 120 MB disk. During the Ubuntu install procedure, you begin with some menus that permit you to add a partition to the hard disk. This allows you to install Ubuntu in a separate disk partition without disturbing the Windows installation. You must allocate enough disk space in the new partition to run Ubuntu and whatever extra space you need for "add on" software packages and data. I used 20MB partition of the 120 MB disk. After Ubuntu was installed, then each time I booted the PC, Ubuntu recognized the Windows partition during boot, and gave me a menu screen to choose to boot the Windows partition or the Ubuntu partition. If I chose to boot Windows, then Windows would run as usual without knowing there is Ubuntu installed on the other partition. It only knows it has a smaller disk (100 MB, not 120 MB), and some mysterious 20 MB partition that it cannot access. But if I boot into Ubuntu, Ubuntu runs, and will show the Windows partition, and will allow me to look through it and read and use files that I saved on the Windows partition. I can also copy any Windows files I want into the Ubuntu partition, or create new files in either the Windows partition or the Ubuntu partition. After awhile, I decided to remove the Ubuntu partition and run pure Windows on that computer. This was easy to do using Ubuntu. I was back to 120 MB hard disk for Windows after uninstalling Ubuntu. Best wishes, J_P |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Horror museum I mean... Maybe Ubuntu will not run... you could always try with some macumba instead! Don't tell me... you have also a magnetized and LOUD green-phospors monitor... Kind regards, Max
__________________
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim... But we dont need a reason " someone said... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
If only i had enough brains to keep it.I reassembled it long time ago searching for scrap material....But i do keep Atari ST520 and Schneider CPC6128 as brand new! Ebay...here i come!
About Ubuntu (not Bubuntu - it was a joke); during installation process i noticed it is better your dsl to be present and than all the process are going faster and better without to much asking questions and bugging. Actually Ubuntu automatically download all neccessary drivers (packages) and updates in no time. I am plain novice in Linux so i will not talk to much on that subject, because Qiaozhi might die laughing when read my words. Just noticed that benefit from dsl and was pretty amazed with speed and how all installation was done without any problem or hitch. "...my 2 cents..."
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
That kind ...yes. But my was amber not green! 14" !!!
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes, very nice how Ubuntu recognizes most hardware and auto installs the correct drivers. Maybe you can try installing Ubuntu on your Turbo-XT. -- Probably has the needed drivers, but will take a long time to download with the Hayes modem.. Best wishes, J_P |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks for explanations! I have already downloaded it and will try it some day.This one think i want to do from long time. But you mean Gb, not Mb , right ? I can´t imagine xp on a 120mb disk... Regards, Fred. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Should be no problem. Check first by running Ubuntu directly from the CD. Be aware that it runs slower that way, but is much faster after a proper install.
|
|
|