LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2008, 01:15 PM
abdlam abdlam is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Default GOLD compass

hi friends,
i will put here a useful device wich detects gold only and egnore all other minirals and vacuums or water and anything undesirable.
i had try it succesfuly and i hope you try it !
it contains of:it contains of:
50cm 4ml copper rod
or 33cm 4ml copper rod
without handl which as your hand size
front champer plastic fill of sand and 4 neodmuim magnatic pcs
it's size 5 ml
rear champer contaicns :
40 gm fine sand and coal ,table salt ,small sulphoe and ceramic pcs
which saved in plastic tape
this device is the result of long way of my looking for real thing
just try it and you will not feel failure>>>
good luck from abdlam
most regards
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-20-2008, 04:45 PM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well above sea level
Posts: 843
Default Theory?

Would you happen to have a theory as to how (or why) these particular ingredients and magnets will cause this rod to draw only to gold?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:09 AM
Dell Winders's Avatar
Dell Winders Dell Winders is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Haines City, Florida
Posts: 842
Default

There is certainly no need for mundane theory if you have results. Adblam, claims results, and shows you how to make what he gets results with. What more can you ask? Try it! Dell
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2008, 02:28 AM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well above sea level
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dell Winders View Post
There is certainly no need for mundane theory if you have results. Adblam, claims results, and shows you how to make what he gets results with. What more can you ask? Try it! Dell
In no way am I trying to debate/question the claimed results of Adblam.
Where did you get that idea? Are you speaking for or representing Adblam?

Actual results could only be verified through peer review and/or a third-party testing agency. That could hardly be done here in an open forum.

The list of ingredients, quantities and placement in the capsules of the "chemical rod" shown, would suggest there is some relevance to an interaction between the items and the sought-after target - gold. I merely asked if there was some theory or physics/chemical principle that applied to the construction and materials. If there isn't one, than I suppose the ingredients are completely arbitrary, and could just as easily be dirt, baking soda or peanut butter.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2008, 11:35 PM
Tim Williams's Avatar
Tim Williams Tim Williams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 198
Default

Dell nice picture you have there!
__________________
Bringing metal detectors into the world of imaging!

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:17 AM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

The only compass for gold I saw was used by a man. Is a needle (no magnetized) tip plated by gold floating in vaseline and water in a cristal glass. This old man found gold with it (he said) but movement is slow. No ideomotor effect here, he told. Wind no causes trouble, also...
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:41 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,107
Default

Abdlam, that rod looks somewhat similar to a PPL. I'm not sure about the table salt (sodium chloride), I've heard potasium chloride has some very slight radioactivity. As for the sulphur, it has some interesting properties especially related to electrostatics. The old electroscopes used sulphur as the insulator where the rod comes out of the jar.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-22-2008, 03:20 PM
abdlam abdlam is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
Abdlam, that rod looks somewhat similar to a PPL. I'm not sure about the table salt (sodium chloride), I've heard potasium chloride has some very slight radioactivity. As for the sulphur, it has some interesting properties especially related to electrostatics. The old electroscopes used sulphur as the insulator where the rod comes out of the jar.
hi dear,
there are more than 10 devices and ways to look for GOLD or metals but this device will make anyone happy by it's result.
i did not put it here to discuss theory or to win fame,no.
i put it here as apresent from me to anyone need real and true thing to findGOLD
i had try it more than 10 times and it proov
that ignore all of caves,underground water,any other mines or meatals and
also copper
.it points only when you find treasures or gold nugts
anyone in dobt just try to build it first,hide sample of things and test and i am sure you will find the good results.
i mean the soduim chlorid when i wrote table sult and i correct the sulpho : it is yellow ssulphore>>>
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-22-2008, 07:57 PM
Max's Avatar
Max Max is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mars (cool)
Posts: 2,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
The only compass for gold I saw was used by a man. Is a needle (no magnetized) tip plated by gold floating in vaseline and water in a cristal glass. This old man found gold with it (he said) but movement is slow. No ideomotor effect here, he told. Wind no causes trouble, also...
Hi,
are you sure the old man didn't use that vaseline in other ways ???

Maybe some compass rod he put somewhere and then concentrate on gold statues!

Think about before you retry experiments...

Kind regards,
Max
__________________

"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason
"

someone said...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:50 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post
Hi,
are you sure the old man didn't use that vaseline in other ways ???

Maybe some compass rod he put somewhere and then concentrate on gold statues!

Think about before you retry experiments...

Kind regards,
Max
Who knows!!!

Regards

Esteban
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:03 AM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
Abdlam, that rod looks somewhat similar to a PPL. I'm not sure about the table salt (sodium chloride), I've heard potasium chloride has some very slight radioactivity. As for the sulphur, it has some interesting properties especially related to electrostatics. The old electroscopes used sulphur as the insulator where the rod comes out of the jar.
You can burn a lamp mantle in alcohol (but no drink this!!!) and use the thorium oxide as high radiactivity source. Prefer made in China mantles. If you have a pocket radiation detector you can select mantles. I found some plenty of radiactivity. Do you wish detect gold at some distance with electronics and radiactivity? Here your sensor (oh another idea!!!) But be careful with this!!! Also Americium "attracts" gold, you can found this in old smoke detector. But this is more dangerous too!!!
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-23-2008, 01:48 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,107
Default

Potassium chloride is a sodium-free substitute for table salt.

As for thorium, I've read where some people cover the edge of a razor blade with a mixture of thorium and glue to make an emitter. Those lantern mantles can be bought on ebay. They can have a lot of radioactivity (and many times more if concentrated), enough to set off the red warning light on my dosimeter. Americanium is very dangerous--goes to tyour bones.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-23-2008, 02:40 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,107
Default

Holding your hands around the glass with the floating needle is a different sensation. There is a capacitor effect between your hands.

As for getting the needle to point to a target, I don't know. Any water currents are going to affect it, like heat from your hands, etc. Maybe some baffles would help keep the water still. Seems you would need to degauss it or magnetize it so both ends are the same pole.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-23-2008, 02:52 PM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well above sea level
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
...or magnetize it so both ends are the same pole.
That might be a rather cute trick.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-23-2008, 03:44 PM
Max's Avatar
Max Max is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mars (cool)
Posts: 2,684
Default

I still don't understand what a lantern matle or americium stuff has to do with LRL (apart nonsense )...
__________________

"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason
"

someone said...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-23-2008, 04:07 PM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well above sea level
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post
I still don't understand what a lantern matle or americium stuff has to do with LRL (apart nonsense )...
Well... if I understand the posts above, where that stuff was mentioned, it appears we are supposed to believe that those things will physically attract (themselves) to gold. That being the case, I suppose someone has actually attached these things to an otherwise free-standing pivot contraption of some sort, and then observed said pivot device physically move towards gold that was brought into range.

Yeah.... right, I think that is the implication. I think also that no human element is required to cause said attraction, and hence no handheld ideomotor readout device would be required.

Well.... whatever.....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-23-2008, 07:09 PM
abdlam abdlam is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
Potassium chloride is a sodium-free substitute for table salt.

As for thorium, I've read where some people cover the edge of a razor blade with a mixture of thorium and glue to make an emitter. Those lantern mantles can be bought on ebay. They can have a lot of radioactivity (and many times more if concentrated), enough to set off the red warning light on my dosimeter. Americanium is very dangerous--goes to tyour bones.
thanks,but is there any danger when using neodemyium and tuch it by hand directly?
please , who has any information about that tell us,
regards
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-24-2008, 01:10 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,107
Default

It is my understanding that small magnets won't hurt a healthy adult. A good rule is never apply magnets to your head. If you are like me, when I hold a neo magnet I can feel something sort of like nerve twitches.

As for radioactive materials on a rod, there are different treories. One is that the tip of the rod is an emitter and the radioactive material enhances this effect. Do a google search for homebrew lightning detector.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-24-2008, 04:08 PM
Max's Avatar
Max Max is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mars (cool)
Posts: 2,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abdlam View Post
thanks,but is there any danger when using neodemyium and tuch it by hand directly?
please , who has any information about that tell us,
regards
Hi,
yes it's sure toxic and you must handle with care. Although there aren't public domain studies on neodymium contamination and related diseases you could expect this kind of effects if contamination is present:

-neural diseases
-eyes diseases
-skin diseases
-autoimmune diseases primer
-lung-embolism (cause of fine dust)
-cancer/mutagenic effects at higher rates

Good precautions are needed handling it (avoid bare skin contact or brushing your eyes after you touched it).

If dust of it is present in the environment use breather/mask for extra fine particles (this will save you from embolism at least)... though eyes and skin will be exposed and this will be a problem.

Avoid eating or drinking while handling/using neodymium compounds or parts... cause like with other metals like nickel you'll eat or drink it too if don't be really careful.

The last, if for higher contaminations and there are no official data of cancerogenicity or mutagenic activity of neodymium.

The fact neodymium was discarded from being a component in bio-alloys (e.g. for bone repair...) make me think there's diffused idea in the biomedical world that neodymium and its alloys are potentially strong mutagenic agents.

Kind regards,
Max
__________________

"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason
"

someone said...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-24-2008, 09:13 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post
Hi,
yes it's sure toxic and you must handle with care. Although there aren't public domain studies on neodymium contamination and related diseases you could expect this kind of effects if contamination is present:

-neural diseases
-eyes diseases
-skin diseases
-autoimmune diseases primer
-lung-embolism (cause of fine dust)
-cancer/mutagenic effects at higher rates

Good precautions are needed handling it (avoid bare skin contact or brushing your eyes after you touched it).

If dust of it is present in the environment use breather/mask for extra fine particles (this will save you from embolism at least)... though eyes and skin will be exposed and this will be a problem.

Avoid eating or drinking while handling/using neodymium compounds or parts... cause like with other metals like nickel you'll eat or drink it too if don't be really careful.

The last, if for higher contaminations and there are no official data of cancerogenicity or mutagenic activity of neodymium.

The fact neodymium was discarded from being a component in bio-alloys (e.g. for bone repair...) make me think there's diffused idea in the biomedical world that neodymium and its alloys are potentially strong mutagenic agents.

Kind regards,
Max
Good! So Abdlam, mantain the magnets just inside your rod chamber!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-25-2008, 01:20 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,107
Default

The only danger from neo magnets I have heard of (for healthy adult) is if you swallow two of them they can get stuck in your intestines. They can pinch your fingers or splinter and get sharp pieces in your eyes. I'm not saying they are safe. I have real questions about extended exposure to magnetic fields. Anyone doing any work with magnets next to their body should read about it first. If the wrong polarity is applied tumors can increase in growth rate.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-25-2008, 07:28 PM
WesP's Avatar
WesP WesP is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fullerton, Ca
Posts: 40
Question Tumor Growth?

Can you site some VALID medical studies that showed that magnets cause accelerated tumor growth. What about MRI's? They are used as a diagnostic tool in cancer treatment and they certainly have a very strong magnetic field.
How would you determine which polarity of magnetic field would do you harm?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-25-2008, 08:29 PM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well above sea level
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WesP View Post
Can you site some VALID medical studies that showed that magnets cause accelerated tumor growth. What about MRI's? They are used as a diagnostic tool in cancer treatment and they certainly have a very strong magnetic field.
How would you determine which polarity of magnetic field would do you harm?
I think you'll find all his facts(?) come from books located on the shelves of the Occult Library.

As such, the value of such remarks must be discounted as having very little or zero significance.
__________________

The Wallet-Miner's Creed
Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-26-2008, 03:33 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Good lecture. Resonant power source

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directo...uclear_Reactor
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-26-2008, 05:07 PM
Max's Avatar
Max Max is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mars (cool)
Posts: 2,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WesP View Post
Can you site some VALID medical studies that showed that magnets cause accelerated tumor growth. What about MRI's? They are used as a diagnostic tool in cancer treatment and they certainly have a very strong magnetic field.
How would you determine which polarity of magnetic field would do you harm?
Hi,
probably you don't understand what I write ... I didn't say I have the documents but that he could expect these kind of effects, so I mean some of these are already well known and understud, like skin and eyes problems handling that stuff with bare skin or brushing eyes...

about cancer you will not find anything cause compounds and element are rare and their effects on health are still "unknown", but to the general public. I guess someone have studies on toxicity of neodymium in such a way (mutagenic/cancer effects) but will not provide you.

It's like 80years ago with asbestos fibers and compounds : it was largely used in the industry... not cause nobody had data about toxicity but just cause some diseases could be related to it just after 30-40years span statistical studies....

Wanna be a statitic too...? is up to you... me personally will not touch it with bare skin or eat just cause I need a sandwich in the middle of my magnet assembly session!

Kind regards,
Max
__________________

"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason
"

someone said...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.