LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2007, 11:29 PM
Qiaozhi's Avatar
Qiaozhi Qiaozhi is offline
Guru (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,645
Default The butt of the righteous!!


According to the Ranger-Tell website, someone has said this about our illustrious webmaster - "You appear to have been born to approximate the butt of the righteous!!"

Not only that - but a large portion of my spoof description of the Ranger-Tell Examiner is still there for all to see! (I thought it had been deleted.) Unfortunately, whoever posted it there has misinterpreted my pseudoscientific gobbledygook as reality.

In fact, this is what they have to say:
"This is an interesting post from someone who obviously knows enough to be respected. Caveats are inevitable in the environnent of anti-LRLs but this is a reasonably impartial examination. It's one man's view and needs qualification but is more like what one expects. This is not to say that the poster is for or against their use. Only that there is a scientific basis for the components that are in the Examiner. The concepts touch on what we have discovered to a point. We are grateful that someone has taken the time to look deeper. In fact Schumann's Resonance (ibid) is a vital part of the RT circuitry."

As everyone here knows, I am a skeptic regarding dowsing (mental or otherwise) and LRLs. Somewhat ironic - don't you think.

They also claim that this was "the ill-fated expose of the Examiner that back-fired on the illogical skeptics as the information was too close to the mark.".

Anyway - if you've never looked at their website - it's good for a laugh.
http://www.rangertell.com/to_the_skeptic.htm

Have a great Christmas!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-25-2007, 05:50 PM
Carl-NC's Avatar
Carl-NC Carl-NC is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 889
Default

Sorry, I have tried to several times in the past read the what you have. But when basic sentence structure takes the back seat then that's certainly what results in the eye of the reader. Unless you're a complete moron and cannot possibly perceive the outcome. So I will half to look at this from another angle, namely the oblique of the negative torque. And I stand behind 110%. A-yup.

- Carl
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.