![]() |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If you see careful the LRL films,i said IT ABSORBE,sorry for my bad english,it means the PD is absorbing the Phenomenon,this hapens more slow or more fast,i think depends on many factors. Regards |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This 8 cm diameter coil used in the original PD is perfect,i think if i use biger is not good... |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
hello brodhy morgan where are you, may be vey busy in your laboratories of experimentations? one embrace my electronic winer
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here all ok,but no treasures,yes many coins and objects. Abrazos |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Maybe you can get better detection by using a smaller diameter search coil. Maybe a 1 cm diameter will work better. But you must make more turns to achieve the same inductance. Of course, you will also need to make a new null for the ferrite receiver, but this will be easy with the new 1 cm search coil. The real advantage to using a 1 cm search coil is you will no longer need to use a large box to hold a large search coil. You can easily fit all components inside a flashlight enclosure (torch in the UK). Only you can accomplish this because you used the small PCBs same as the origianal Alonso design. ![]() ![]() Will this work? Best wishes, J_P |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
hello guys, little coil gave near distance detection but easy detect coins, too mases how treasures, nuggets etc, large coil hig range, only big objects, but not coins, little chesses, is you decision
|
![]() |
|
|