LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > All-Electronic LRLs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 01-06-2016, 11:04 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

and one example with not ferrite antenna,box 1 with gold and silver,box 2 with paper
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-06-2016, 11:07 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

i use gold gun with fm transmitter and receiver
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-07-2016, 01:06 AM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,097
Default

I guess it depends on the receiver, but that's just a guess why it works better. At least it appears so with my test targets. I know you won't be happy with this answer, but...That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-07-2016, 01:14 AM
WM6's Avatar
WM6 WM6 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Borovnica, Slovenia
Posts: 2,392
Default

No doubt, receiver is important, but don't forget: antenna is always part of receiver.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-07-2016, 05:55 AM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

The antenna make the diference
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-07-2016, 10:33 AM
WM6's Avatar
WM6 WM6 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Borovnica, Slovenia
Posts: 2,392
Default

Exactly, but it not easy task to make HiQ antenna.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-07-2016, 05:00 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,097
Default

yeah, the loop antenna is more powerful than the ferrite antenna. The gain on the receiver has to be lowered. It requires a few minutes between practice rounds otherwise it will detect where the target was on the last round. The ferrite rod usually does not pick up the residual nearly so much if at all. At least that is with a half ounce of silver.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-07-2016, 05:20 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

I have this antenna and it is better from ferrite antenna
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-07-2016, 06:20 PM
abdou2014 abdou2014 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,042
Default

HELLO. GOOD WORK . PLEASE DIAMETER OF WIRE AND NUMBER OF TOUR. I WANT TRY IT
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-07-2016, 07:30 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taxma1981 View Post
I have this antenna and it is better from ferrite antenna
Yes, I like the idea...I will build one.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-07-2016, 07:41 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

The coils haven 10 cm diameter,

Wire 0.2 mm

9-10 mh
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-07-2016, 07:57 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,097
Default

Is that for transmit?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:06 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

This is the coil from receiver
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:13 PM
abdou2014 abdou2014 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,042
Default

10 Mh is too much . what is the value of parallel capacitor
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:16 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abdou2014 View Post
10 Mh is too much . what is the value of parallel capacitor

820pf


mh not Mh
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:33 PM
abdou2014 abdou2014 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,042
Default

10 millihenry is too much . what is your reception range .
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:40 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

theoretically 58-60 khz :χαχαχα:

One example
https://youtu.be/SXeBqkunHbk
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:50 PM
abdou2014 abdou2014 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,042
Default

you must calibre it with transmitter . my GG918 work between 35-80 Khz.

http://www.longrangelocators.com/for...t=15058&page=6

58-60 Khz it's not enough .
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-07-2016, 09:01 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

58-60 khz with this antenna and 10-24 with second antenna
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-07-2016, 09:01 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abdou2014 View Post
you must calibre it with transmitter . my GG918 work between 35-80 Khz.

http://www.longrangelocators.com/for...t=15058&page=6

58-60 Khz it's not enough .
do you have video??
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 01-07-2016, 09:16 PM
abdou2014 abdou2014 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,042
Default

i did not now. but i'll do one next time .did you find anything with it
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-07-2016, 09:18 PM
taxma1981 taxma1981 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 525
Default

i dont test it
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-07-2016, 09:23 PM
abdou2014 abdou2014 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,042
Default

you must test it and find gold with it . That's the real success !!!
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-08-2016, 11:35 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,097
Default

Found out today the threshold was set too tight. By giving a little more room before it goes off, there are less weak, broken signals, gets rid of the scattered garbage. Easier and more accurate to pinpoint this way. Less false alarms. I always thought the threshold had to be so close, so tight like with a metal detector, but not the case. Sort of like the squelch on a CB radio if it sounds off too easily you just get a lot of static. Works much better now.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-09-2016, 04:28 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,097
Default

Been working indoors today due to cold weather. The loop antenna is just not as accurate indoors. Need to redesign it, I guess. I have found that the wire position is critical. Just a few wraps out of place (off center) and there is a very noticeable effect--it does not aim correctly.

user.netonecom.net/~swordman/Radio/re-loop-article.htm

You see why i hate posting links. That's the right address, you'll just have to copy it yourself or search "Doug's loop antenna article"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.