#2826
|
|||
|
|||
niccce humhum! I used the first technique recently (speaker wire) and its really very convenient. |
#2827
|
||||
|
||||
I did all the franco circuits. Here in Brazil it doesn't work, not even in the test field...:n?o n?o::carranca:
|
#2828
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
How old is your test field? What indication method did you pick up for your receiver? Have you tested a voltmeter in place of leds? Can you share how did you confirm that your device is built successfully? Do you own an oscilloscope? Thanks |
#2829
|
||||
|
||||
For your country You can use FM Receive method and frequency of big master Esteban .
|
#2830
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Mr Franco
I created version on 20Mhz (crystal 14Mhz). How can adjust to pot 1,2,3 and c10 to get the maximum performance to one harmonic? I have not oscilloscope. I can measure volts at the output? The value i have to get? Thank you in advance. |
#2831
|
|||
|
|||
Measurements must be made at the sensor stage output (direct voltage). C10 needs to be adjusted for maximum output. Obviously you have to follow the instructions of the helps, no signal must be there without the quartz and others.
|
#2832
|
||||
|
||||
hello franco lrl, is it electrostatic or electromagnetic, can I get some information?
|
#2833
|
|||
|
|||
I think it's electromagnetic, I can't tell you more.
|
#2834
|
||||
|
||||
LRL project
|
#2835
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#2836
|
||||
|
||||
LRL 2 project
|
#2837
|
|||
|
|||
|
#2838
|
||||
|
||||
yes 20 mhz
|
#2839
|
||||
|
||||
I finished the version 20mhz today.I have not tested in practice yet.But in practice it works like version 8mhz.With 22 pf capacitor, the output of the sensor is 5 volts dc.Touching the telescopic antenna reduces the output between 300 and 700 mV.I connect the sensor output to a 32-bit microcontroller.The measurement accuracy with the 32-bit microcontroller is very high and the smallest change is displayed.Currently I am facing a real test location challengePlease guide me in this regard
__________________
Knowledge is the greatest wealth
|
#2840
|
|||
|
|||
The 20 Mhz version is certainly more sensitive than the 8Mhz version because L1 / C10 is tuned on a 20 Mhz harmonic. To check correct operation, the rule is the same as the 8 Mhz version, that is, test on the test field.
|
#2841
|
||||
|
||||
I don't understand why this detector fails to manufacture it? honestly it doesn't work!
|
#2842
|
||||
|
||||
I have the proving ground and this detector really didn't work!!
|
#2843
|
||||
|
||||
newcomers to the group!search for alonso pd
|
#2844
|
||||
|
||||
two boxxxx
|
#2845
|
|||
|
|||
Try to pick up a capacitor parallel to the coil. And with the coil itself 3-4-5-6-7 turns. Or squeeze or stretch the turns of the coil to try on the track with the target.
|
#2846
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Franco. What technology does the device use, is it BFO? The fact that there are two resonant circuits that have a harmonic frequency. When the device enters an electric or magnetic field, the resonance frequency changes by a difference of audible sound frequencies. With a low-pass filter with a cut-off frequency of 480Hz, a wide band. Is this the case?
|
#2847
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#2848
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Before every thing, Thanks for your excellent circuit Mr Franco. It seems your circuit isn't a passive device & it transmits harmonic signal to the Ant. through C2 & C9. Gold & Silver are not radioactive metals & I think they haven't Phenomena from themselves. I'm not a pro. engineer & perhaps in mistake. Thanks |
#2849
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR3tzT2Jd-g&t=34s |
#2850
|
|||
|
|||
....... Thank you
|
|
|