IR Lasing Gold - Page 3

Jim · #51 06-20-2009, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALEX.356

Read the book and go by the book.
Then if there are no results then we have the right of criticism.
Until proven liar we have to respect and consider what the author asserts.

Greetings...others and I have "gone by the book" and have not been able to duplicate the results promised by the author. Old buried gold is not a requirement, as the author states his method works on freshly buried gold as well. The author also claims his method works on other buried materials. This is also a false claim.

The method does not work...period. Consider this a "proven liar" notification, if you will.

Theseus · #52 06-20-2009, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim

Greetings...others and I have "gone by the book" and have not been able to duplicate the results promised by the author. Old buried gold is not a requirement, as the author states his method works on freshly buried gold as well. The author also claims his method works on other buried materials. This is also a false claim.

The method does not work...period. Consider this a "proven liar" notification, if you will.

I have not read the book (nor will I waste my time), but I will support your notification based on previous dealings I've had with Mr. David Villanueva. Categorically, he is known for making "lots" of wild unsupported claims especially on the topic of dowsing and related subjects. I'm not at all surprised that you and others were unable to duplicate his claims made in the subject book.

Max · #53 06-20-2009, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALEX.356

Dear friend Jim,
re. David's Villanueva book , it happened to read it a month ago.
I believe it is premature to judge against it before performing the tests as described in the book.
I am certain nobody took the trouble to replicate these tests as detailed by David.
I mean by the same camera, same filters, same photoshop, with serious amounts of gold and silver buried into the soil for a long time, at least for a month, not single coins, not hidden in holes and Zampetas guarding the treasure a la Django [my friend this Zampetas of yours is already world-famous... ]
No need to open any camera and scratch the IR factory filter .
Read the book and go by the book.
Then if there are no results then we have the right of criticism.
Until proven liar we have to respect and consider what the author asserts.
wish you success,
Alex 356

"Until proven liar we have to respect and consider what the author asserts."

Hi,
so, following that logic... you said that if someone wrote e.g. that the aliens bring him up their startship and played poker games with him just for the fun of earning some easy terrestrial money... hmmmmm
must respect the author cause... till not proven a liar...

What's that ?

If someone say that you're the 1,000,000,000 visitor of a website and won a fantastic lamborghini car , you click then, uh ?

There are things that are obvious contraptions... obsvious scams... obvious (and mostly ridiculos) fake claims about LRLs and LRL "methods" ...
no need of a wagon of scientist to have proofs that stuff is a big pile of c.r.a.p.

Anyone can smell BS !

But people how buy that stuff or belive in such impossible-to-be-true claims... are scam-vulnerable... the sellers/authors use that weakness of scientific background and old-good-simple-common-sense to drive them to buy products or books.

Happens with aliens... happens with DaVinci-code things and other idiotic fictions... and happens the same with LRL-fairy-tales!

Just... people who read and belive in Harry Potter magic powers are 5-7 years old... then most of them simply grow and understand the only magic in Harry Potter story is the mountain of pounds J.K.Rowling earned by that pile of "books" and character rights.

Other , instead, remains like childrens and still belive in Santa Claus and Harry Potter... along with Hung's modified RT capable of finding a coin at 1mile in total , 100% foggy day!

Kind regards,
Max

Jim · #54 06-20-2009, 12:12 PM

I'm clicking on the car...but, I can't seem to win it! :::mumbles:::

Qiaozhi · #55 06-20-2009, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim

I'm clicking on the car...but, I can't seem to win it! :::mumbles:::

Too late!
I clicked on it first ... bbrrrrm!

Jim · #56 06-20-2009, 12:45 PM

D'oh

hung · #57 06-21-2009, 12:49 PM

HOMEFIRE:
Don't use unexposed films. Expose the film first (in front of the puzzeld sales girl at the photo store) and tell her to do the regular C41 processing.
Then use it 1, 2 or 3 layers of it in front of the lens of a SLR camera. A CCD will work but not as good. You will have to enhance the picture in a good photoshop type program to see the auras. It will show clearly in the pics.

Professional IR band pass filters are better but you have to try the wavelength that works better for your case.

It's been working for me for quite some time now.
Good luck.

Theseus · #58 06-21-2009, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hung

HOMEFIRE:

It's been working for me for quite some time now.
Good luck.

Sure it has.

I just love it when you debunker that way.

Qiaozhi · #59 06-21-2009, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hung

HOMEFIRE:
Don't use unexposed films. Expose the film first (in front of the puzzeld sales girl at the photo store) and tell her to do the regular C41 processing.
Then use it 1, 2 or 3 layers of it in front of the lens of a SLR camera. A CCD will work but not as good. You will have to enhance the picture in a good photoshop type program to see the auras. It will show clearly in the pics.

Professional IR band pass filters are better but you have to try the wavelength that works better for your case.

It's been working for me for quite some time now.
Good luck.

What Poppycock!

Of course it's working for you, along with a cheap calculator glued to a plastic box and mounted on a swivel handle.

Earth to Hung! Time to wake up and face the real world.

What about the debunkering? Or do I need to use a modified digital camera to see that as well?

homefire · #60 06-21-2009, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hung

HOMEFIRE:
Don't use unexposed films. Expose the film first (in front of the puzzeld sales girl at the photo store) and tell her to do the regular C41 processing.
Then use it 1, 2 or 3 layers of it in front of the lens of a SLR camera. A CCD will work but not as good. You will have to enhance the picture in a good photoshop type program to see the auras. It will show clearly in the pics.

Professional IR band pass filters are better but you have to try the wavelength that works better for your case.

It's been working for me for quite some time now.
Good luck.

My $12.00 Web cam had no filter.

I was just trying to see if the gold would reflect the IR....

I don't know about the Auras Thing!

Max · #61 06-21-2009, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hung

HOMEFIRE:
Don't use unexposed films. Expose the film first (in front of the puzzeld sales girl at the photo store) and tell her to do the regular C41 processing.
Then use it 1, 2 or 3 layers of it in front of the lens of a SLR camera. A CCD will work but not as good. You will have to enhance the picture in a good photoshop type program to see the auras. It will show clearly in the pics.

Professional IR band pass filters are better but you have to try the wavelength that works better for your case.

It's been working for me for quite some time now.
Good luck.

The AURA, yes... and I'm mickey mouse!

What the hell you drink there... ???

Caipirinha , uh ?

Ok... try this... cachaca, sugar, lime, ice cubes... and some burnt transistors ! Maybe will work.

Still the same... always big piles from there... mr. Hung

Kind regards,
Max

Qiaozhi · #62 06-21-2009, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max

The AURA, yes... and I'm mickey mouse!

What the hell you drink there... ???

Caipirinha , uh ?

Ok... try this... cachaca, sugar, lime, ice cubes... and some burnt transistors ! Maybe will work.

Still the same... always big piles from there... mr. Hung

Kind regards,
Max

According to Myron Evans, he's Dr. Hung!

Max · #63 06-21-2009, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

According to Myron Evans, he's Dr. Hung!

Oh, wow.... I'm astonished now!

Dr. Hung looks very professional... and remember me a picture... or LRL-maniacs there... doctor included.

Here in the picture I think is Dr. Hung with members of his team... and , of course, their new LRL prototype... at bottom.

You have to guess who is Dr. Hung... instead!

Kind regards,
Max

Fred · #64 06-21-2009, 07:39 PM

Hi Max,
The correct answer is: Dr Hung is not there, this is only his team.Right?

Fred · #65 06-21-2009, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hung

Expose the film first (in front of the puzzeld sales girl at the photo store) and tell her to do the regular C41 processing.

Is this the only thing you can expose to amazine girls?

Then use it 1, 2 or 3 layers of it in front of the lens of a SLR camera. A CCD will work but not as good. You will have to enhance the picture in a good photoshop type program to see the auras. It will show clearly in the pics.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hung

...it's been working for me for quite some time now.

what do you mean by "working"? you have so many stuff detecting treasures km away, why do you need that ?
Hung, what do you mean by "debunkering" ? You know, you have this in your signature and nobody knows what it means ...