LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2009, 07:27 PM
Rudy's Avatar
Rudy Rudy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Claremont, CA
Posts: 242
Default U. S. Dept of Energy tests dowsing equipment

The U. S. Deptartment of Energy spent over $400,000 testing dowsing equipment. And what did they find?

http://www.time.com/time/columnist/j...231110,00.html
__________________

HH Rudy,
MXT, HeadHunter Wader


Do or do not. There is no try.
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2009, 01:35 AM
Götz von Berlichingen's Avatar
Götz von Berlichingen Götz von Berlichingen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sauerkrautland
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
"Further testing of dowsing...would be a misuse of public funds."
— U.S. Geological Survey report, 1917
What a nice Quote.
Someone was really smart, back in 1917.
Next time they better send the $400,000 to me,
I will invest in Beer and Hookers, that makes more sense.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2009, 03:45 AM
J_Player's Avatar
J_Player J_Player is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,382
Default

After finding that the US government spent hundreds of thousands of dollars testing dowsing devices and LRLs, Time magazine looked at their conclusions and summarized it like this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Time Magazine
In other words, there is no dowsing sixth sense, only dowsing nonsense.
Hmmmm...
I wonder what the pro-dowsing people have to say about that?
Is Time Magazine just another one of Carl's Skeptic lemmings -- a scientific pretender?

Best wishes,
J_P
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2009, 06:16 AM
Carl-NC's Avatar
Carl-NC Carl-NC is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 889
Default

One thing I have to say that is a refreshing change under Obama, is that he is appointing honest-to-goodness scientists to head up his science & technology positions. We haven't had that in... forever. Instead, we've gotten political cronies who were scientifically illiterate, and the results show. Hopefully, under Steven Chu, DOE will begin to show some competence in science.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2009, 05:05 PM
Rudy's Avatar
Rudy Rudy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Claremont, CA
Posts: 242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl-NC View Post
One thing I have to say that is a refreshing change under Obama, is that he is appointing honest-to-goodness scientists to head up his science & technology positions. We haven't had that in... forever. Instead, we've gotten political cronies who were scientifically illiterate, and the results show. Hopefully, under Steven Chu, DOE will begin to show some competence in science.
Amen Carl.
__________________

HH Rudy,
MXT, HeadHunter Wader


Do or do not. There is no try.
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2009, 09:24 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 369
Default

That article was written in 2002. I wonder if there is something more current.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.