LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2012, 07:45 AM
Dedevil Dedevil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 262
Default Why use an LRL?

LRL's were not around in the 1800- 1900 gold rush and they found plenty of gold. So why buy a LRL? Sure there are detectors that will detect at 30ft/10 meters a nugget on the surface. But these detectors will not penatrate the ground and so cannot find a nugget straight below you where the gold is 30feet/10 meters straight below. Also the gold that has been washed along the old creek bed is scattered every where so how would you distinguish between lots of tiny specks and a large nugget? Here's a picture of the detector i use. It will detect to 1 cm max.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Dedevil; 12-20-2012 at 07:58 AM. Reason: pic to big
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2012, 09:48 PM
Dedevil Dedevil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 262
Default Down to 25 feet / 7 meters

Well i must say that LRL's are a good idea BUT In practically digging down through 7 meters of dirt and clay to the bedrock is very hard work.
The pictures here show the shaft about 10cm from the bedrock which is where i started getting small gold.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2012, 09:52 PM
WM6's Avatar
WM6 WM6 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Borovnica, Slovenia
Posts: 2,392
Default

You are on trip again?
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2012, 10:14 PM
Dedevil Dedevil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 262
Default

I think that was an attempt of sarcasim by wm6? No Not trippin I used to process this ore and get an ounce a day with nuggets up to thumb size. With todays gold prices thats around $10,000 a week. These small pieces are everywhere but the hardest thing is getting them seperated from the potters clay in which they lie. For this i used a trommel but i am now moving towards a gravity feed sluice.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2012, 10:43 AM
Dedevil Dedevil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 262
Default Some things i found

One shovell from the bedrock and i was called away due to family being ill.
But here's some pics of what i've found so far at 26 feet depth

Detectors dont like muddy water!
A 1850's style cheisel for smashing though the false bedrock at 24 feet.
A clay pipe with stamp GLASCOW on side
Rusty big nails
Attached Images
    
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2013, 09:31 AM
Dedevil Dedevil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 262
Default color at 13 feet depth

With bushfire alert at maximun i decided to get out of the bush for a few days.
Here is what i've got so far at 13 feet/ 3meters depth. The old river bed is full of fine gold. I panned these few grams in an afternoon from around 6 large buckets. I also stopped because my back was killing me! Next i will have to make a trommel to wash the soils and speed up the process. Hopefully i will be able to speed it up so that i can process 2 ounces a day.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:21 PM
WM6's Avatar
WM6 WM6 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Borovnica, Slovenia
Posts: 2,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedevil View Post

Hopefully i will be able to speed it up so that i can process 2 ounces a day.
Congratulations. Right approach.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.