Originally Posted by Anwar2 (Post 142979)

my friend ithink Im borring u

how could be
see attach

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 142981)

Anwar2 - it is clear, from your inability to wire up a simple potentiometer, that you have an extremely limited knowledge of electronics. May I suggest that you study some basic electronics books before attempting to build anything.

Originally Posted by Dell Winders (Post 142974)

In my tests, Mineoro, does indeed work. I particularly found the electronic depth locator interesting as it beeped when placed at the target's 45 degree emanating field at the same locations as detected with the MFD L-Rods.

Unfortunately, when there is atmospheric Magnetic interference and the MFD, or HID Rod(s) do not respond to the target, or react weak, the Mineoro, will NOT detect the target either. Magnetic conditions have to be favorable for any of the LRL's to work. Brazil, apparently has favorable conditions for LRL's to work. Since 1987 the USA has NOT had favorable Magnetic conditions for LRL to work consistently.

When the Strength of field is fluctuating up & down, it is aggravating having to constantly re-tune the Mineoro from one minute to the next. If you live in the USA you will likely find the Mineoro will work sporadicly as it did when Field tested under conditions in Central Florida.

I remember over 20 years ago when Ralph Shull, sold an electronic receiver LRL, to a friend of mine who stayed for a week with Shull, to train & test the LRL. They would work the beach at Atlantic City, NJ every day and consistently found coins & jewelry. My friend was very happy with the results, purchased the LRL and took it back to his home in Pa., 150 miles away. The LRL would not work there at all. Shull, sent him another one. It didn't work either. My friend took the LRL's back to NJ, to get a refund. They tested them, and both worked perfectly under the favorable conditions just 150 miles away.

You should understand the limitations of any type of LRL, before you decide to purchase. Unfortunately for consumers, most LRL manufacturers, and sellers don't inform you of this limitation. Dell

Originally Posted by humhum (Post 142983)

My Device is good for very Long range, it not good for short range.;)


Regards.

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 143015)

Here are all the problems.... how to pin-point.
Of course if the depth is lower than 20 cm you can use a metal detector, else way..:lol::lol::lol:

Regards:)

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 143020)

I have a lrl that use ferrite for antenna, it has the ability to locate objects from 300 or 500m far very easy. But when i am near to object it works with many "interruptions",

Regards

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 143020)

Maybe you did not understand me. When you have a lrl with ability to locate an object from 500m far or from bigger distance then there is problem near to object. I say this "pinpoint"... for lrls.
I have a lrl that use ferrite for antenna, it has the ability to locate objects from 300 or 500m far very easy. But when i am near to object it works with many "interruptions", you think that the signal is so strong and the preamplifier is under saturation.
I did not found the solution for this problem:(.

Regards

Originally Posted by humhum (Post 143023)

Yes Geo , you is right when I is near to object ,for my is very difficul with Pin-Point , and other topic is my LRL locate big object up to 8-10km long distance not only 500m.But have only problem with Pin Point.

Originally Posted by WM6 (Post 143021)

And how do you know that you locate "object" from 500m and not some other of many possible sources of signal, or LRL has malfunction, or you take wrong explanation of LRL signal (as we can saw on some of your videos)?

It is physically impossible to detect something from 500m and not to "pinpoint" the same thing from 3m, except in very very hot imagination.

Dreaming is ok, but too hot dreaming and hanging on unsubstantiated wishes, can block real development in remote detecting.

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 143024)

What "big object" have you managed to locate at 10km?

Originally Posted by humhum (Post 143026)

Hi Qiaozhi, I say for Big object that is big treasure in cavern with gold. I have and other tests with my device all is correct and foolproof , after find target , I use Radar Detector for vision of treasure. But I not excavate because have very strong law for it.


Regards.

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 143027)

Also, how can you be sure that the treasure is really there if you have not dug it up?

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 143027)

What Radar Detector did you use, and what "vision of treasure" did you see?
Also, how can you be sure that the treasure is really there if you have not dug it up?

Originally Posted by humhum (Post 143028)

I am sure because ı see treasure into Radar Metal Detector (GPR).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BAW-F9AC5Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmpAmmDj5Gs

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 143031)

As i know GPRs don't discriminate. This is a problem:(. But if you knowthe size and the figure of the treasure then you can know if what you see from GPR is what you want.
But here i will say something else..... can a metal detector discriminate between gold and rust of steel?????:lol:

Regards:)

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 143030)

Can this GPR discriminate?
If not, then how can you be sure that it's really a treasure and not a lump of iron, such as a buried pipe?

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 143032)

What I'm getting at is ... you cannot claim that you've found a treasure (especially from 10km distance) if you've never dug it up. ;)

Originally Posted by humhum (Post 143034)

Yes , but I it see without excavate.


Regards.

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 143032)

What I'm getting at is ... you cannot claim that you've found a treasure (especially from 10km distance) if you've never dug it up. ;)

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 143036)

I agree. But i have found objects from 300+ meter, distance that it is not seem true to the sceptics.
:)

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi (Post 143038)

The trouble with these anecdotes is the manner in which the object was found. Invariably the teller of the story has used an LRL to follow some sort of signal. What that signal is, we have no idea, but it is supposed to emanate from the distant object and is received by the LRL. After following the signal for some time, it becomes erratic, which apparently gives an indication that you are close to the target. At that point a different device (usually a metal detector) is used to locate the object.

I would bet that, if you were to retrace your 300m journey back to the starting point, searching carefully with the metal detector along the way, there would be numerous other objcets that never registered on the LRL.

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 143039)

We are so old men to make so big mistakes:lol:.
The problem of sceptics is that they never saw a man to locate objects from big distance and to take it out without the help of any metal detector. One of them (sceptics) was me before some years until i saw a friend of me to locate objects very easy and from very far with only the lrods. It was the person that i said to WM6 to visit Greece so to show him how the lrl and the lrods work.
But now it is very late:angry:.
My friend died before 3 months:(:(:(. It was only 55 years old:(.

Regards:)

:)