LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > All-Electronic LRLs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2013, 08:48 PM
DrTech's Avatar
DrTech DrTech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 48
Default LRL Recharged

LRL Recharged.

IR Transmitter

1 TX Infrared
3 RX PD, PDC210, Rx Ferrite

test video soon.
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2013, 11:03 PM
fmnotes fmnotes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTech View Post
LRL Recharged.

IR Transmitter

1 TX Infrared
3 RX PD, PDC210, Rx Ferrite

test video soon.
Construct the locator you him?
From what I see you have pieces from the differential detector MINEORO
Can you give me more information about this detector the machine?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-04-2013, 09:43 AM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTech View Post
LRL Recharged.

IR Transmitter

1 TX Infrared
3 RX PD, PDC210, Rx Ferrite

test video soon.
Hi Drtech.
Congratulation for your PD.
It is a typical Alonsos's PD.


Regards
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2013, 01:36 AM
Baterista Baterista is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTech View Post
LRL Recharged.

IR Transmitter

1 TX Infrared
3 RX PD, PDC210, Rx Ferrite

test video soon.


Hello DrTech, I noticed that you have a PCB Mineoro without the traditional epoxy black,
could you check if this layout contains errors, only on the top layer. Thanks.





Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2013, 04:36 AM
DrTech's Avatar
DrTech DrTech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 48
Default

I will check it...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2013, 04:53 AM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baterista View Post
Hello DrTech, I noticed that you have a PCB Mineoro without the traditional epoxy black,
could you check if this layout contains errors, only on the top layer. Thanks.





Hi.
If you have the program i attached this schematic as schematic from FG79. Search for it. I think that the only difference is the inductance of 2 coils.

Regards
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-10-2013, 10:01 PM
Baterista Baterista is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo View Post
Hi.
If you have the program i attached this schematic as schematic from FG79. Search for it. I think that the only difference is the inductance of 2 coils.

Regards

Hello Geo, I... don't quite understood.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2013, 05:03 AM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Hi Baterista.
Here is the schematic of the Mineoro with the PCB that you attached here. You can change only the value of pot-cores.
But i have not the code of AT89C2051.

Regards
Attached Images
 
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2013, 10:29 AM
Orbit Orbit is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8
Default

right to work ? what catches ?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-11-2013, 09:23 PM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orbit View Post
right to work ? what catches ?
This is not a good model.
So... for me don't catch nothing....
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:10 PM
Baterista Baterista is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo View Post
Hi Baterista.
Here is the schematic of the Mineoro with the PCB that you attached here. You can change only the value of pot-cores.
But i have not the code of AT89C2051.

Regards

Now I understood Geo, thank you, you drew this from the PCB of FG79?
The FG79 and the PDC 210 has the same layout?
I'm checking the schematic by the PCB to see if there are differences.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:18 PM
Baterista Baterista is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTech View Post
I will check it...

Hello DrTech, thank you, your check will be very important.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-12-2013, 04:57 AM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baterista View Post
Now I understood Geo, thank you, you drew this from the PCB of FG79?
The FG79 and the PDC 210 has the same layout?
I'm checking the schematic by the PCB to see if there are differences.
Hi.
Yes i drew it from pcb of FG79...
I think that PDC210 and FG79 has the same pcb with small difference at capacitors (different frequency).
When you will check it, inform me if my schematic has any error.....


Regards
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-29-2013, 01:25 AM
Baterista Baterista is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTech View Post
I will check it...

And I also think overdid on request to DrTech, I do not know of free time of every person, if only because
the scheme of Geo was very helpful, I'll just only request a thing to the DrTech, check where the
trace marked with at yellow arrow in the picture below ends.

Quote:
Hi.
Yes i drew it from pcb of FG79...
I think that PDC210 and FG79 has the same pcb with small difference at capacitors (different frequency).
When you will check it, inform me if my schematic has any error.....


Regards

Hello Geo, the markings in red indicates the components that not appear in the scheme.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-29-2013, 05:28 AM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baterista View Post




Hello Geo, the markings in red indicates the components that not appear in the scheme.
Hi Baterista.
It is long time that i reversed this pcb.
There are people who constructed it so i am sure it works. From what i see R6 is the R20 (560 R) at my schematic, and some capacitors are from the power supply. I suppose that you have and the (my) schematic of power supply.

Regards
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-30-2013, 01:27 AM
Baterista Baterista is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo View Post
Hi Baterista.
It is long time that i reversed this pcb.
There are people who constructed it so i am sure it works. From what i see R6 is the R20 (560 R) at my schematic, and some capacitors are from the power supply. I suppose that you have and the (my) schematic of power supply.

Regards
Hi, yes, Geo, power supply schematic is your, thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-31-2013, 05:02 AM
DrTech's Avatar
DrTech DrTech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 48
Default PDC2001B

these are the corrections....
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-31-2013, 03:39 PM
Baterista Baterista is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTech View Post
these are the corrections....

Oh! DrTech, thank you very much by the corrections and by the your time spent, when I finish the corrections the PCB I'll open a new topic and post all the files.
best regards.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-31-2013, 03:55 PM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Hi baterista.
I am waiting for your Mineoro version.....

REgards
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-05-2013, 04:59 AM
detectoman's Avatar
detectoman detectoman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 935
Default

A experimental prototipe whit four transistors in rx and one transistor by tx all power regulated whit lm317 to 3 volts very low consume was try 1.5 v. spark at 90 cms distance visit my electonician hobby site http://youtu.be/jtOZJXwRDH4
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-05-2013, 05:11 AM
detectoman's Avatar
detectoman detectoman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 935
Default

other view of these tries, the oscilator tx, is a liitle circuit of one transistor sited below near the omega coil all work whit two 9 volts bateries `power regulated, has wave saw tooth, the circut experimental exposed at proxime new modification for most gain whit transistors changes and any other alteration look; http://youtu.be/E0xf68E-R-Q
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-11-2014, 06:36 AM
roccocoin roccocoin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 88
Default hello drtech

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTech View Post
these are the corrections....
hello drtech, you may aggiungiere the detailed parts list? thanks
the pcb I have to do the correct one with the red lines? and that correct? jumpers should I let him? thanks
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-11-2014, 03:56 PM
DrTech's Avatar
DrTech DrTech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 48
Default Ionic Chamber

Roco, I can send you all the information, the problem is to build:

1.- The ionic chamber.
2.- The antenna loop and calculate the ferrite toroid

You can tell as you go has build the ionic chamber?

For me it was easier to build LRL Passive Receiver PD with a coil, and you can get more distance with a ferrite antenna.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.