LECTRA SEARCH

[ma330]

hi to all
can any one give me lectra search(LRL) schematic and pcb???
TANK YOU

[Max]

Originally Posted by ma330

hi to all
can any one give me lectra search(LRL) schematic and pcb???
TANK YOU

Hmmm...

why don't you try with instant lottery ?

Seems that you can make more money with that... if you don't belive in statistics , of course.

Kind regards,
Max

[WM6]

Maybe this solve your problem?

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by WM6

Maybe this solve your problem?

Excellent post of the circuit.
We see no component values, and no tuning instructions. But the schematic is too clear.
Can you reduce the image to the size of a postage stamp?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Theseus]

Originally Posted by J_Player

Excellent post of the circuit.
We see no component values, and no tuning instructions. But the schematic is too clear.
Can you reduce the image to the size of a postage stamp?

Best wishes,
J_P

I fear some here might have to stand up while reading your post, otherwise your subtle humor is going to go right over their head.

Nice going.... J_P!

Incidently, there aren't any values because that is a schematic lifted from a Patent Disclosure. Perhaps the text of the Disclosure contained some values - or not.

[WM6]

Originally Posted by J_Player

Excellent post of the circuit.

Can you reduce the image to the size of a postage stamp?

Best wishes,
J_P

O yes, I will do this in SMD version. Components are not critical, one can use all value between 33 and 3,300,000. Be creative, big success guarantee.

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by WM6

O yes, I will do this in SMD version. Components are not critical, one can use all value between 33 and 3,300,000. Be creative, big success guarantee.

Component values between 33 and 3,300,000?
Hmmmm...

You can save yourself a lot of time and trouble by simply ordering a "Mr. Stick" for less than $100 US. The Mr. Stick weighs between 33 and 3,300,000 mg, and will perform as well as any commercially sold LRL. Of course, it only has one antenna, but the free "Mr. Egg" attachment makes up for the missing two antennas. http://www.geocities.com/joe9999b/MR_STICK.html

Best wishes,
J_P

[Fred]

Originally Posted by J_Player

Can you reduce the image to the size of a postage stamp?

Best wishes,
J_P

I knew it:You are a perfectionist

[Max]

Originally Posted by J_Player

Component values between 33 and 3,300,000?
Hmmmm...

You can save yourself a lot of time and trouble by simply ordering a "Mr. Stick" for less than $100 US. The Mr. Stick weighs between 33 and 3,300,000 mg, and will perform as well as any commercially sold LRL. Of course, it only has one antenna, but the free "Mr. Egg" attachment makes up for the missing two antennas. http://www.geocities.com/joe9999b/MR_STICK.html

Best wishes,
J_P

Hi,
I think there's a connection between Mr. Stick and PaloAlto stuff... but don't see it...

Maybe Esteban knows...

Kind regards,
Max

[ma330]

Originally Posted by WM6

Maybe this solve your problem?

tank you dear wm6.
i want part list and value partif possible for you.
and very guide about this schematic.
tank you.
Best wishes

[Max]

Originally Posted by ma330

tank you dear wm6.
i want part list and value partif possible for you.
and very guide about this schematic.
tank you.
Best wishes

Only that ???

Why don't you ask for a BigMac also ???

And potatoes ???

Coke ???

Maybe you need full menu...

Fast-food of LRLs! You have just to order...

Kind regards,
Max

[WM6]

Originally Posted by J_Player

Component values between 33 and 3,300,000?
Hmmmm...

You can save yourself a lot of time and trouble by simply ordering a "Mr. Stick" for less than $100 US. The Mr. Stick weighs between 33 and 3,300,000 mg, and will perform as well as any commercially sold LRL. Of course, it only has one antenna, but the free "Mr. Egg" attachment makes up for the missing two antennas. http://www.geocities.com/joe9999b/MR_STICK.html

Best wishes,
J_P

I believe that proposed "Mr. Stick" construction works terrible, but really don't like such Versace design. The value of elements as tunning procedure also missing.

[WM6]

Originally Posted by ma330

tank you dear wm6.
i want part list and value partif possible for you.
and very guide about this schematic.
tank you.
Best wishes

Dear ma330, better to study molecular biology. This can be simplest solution.

Plants namely all the information on underground objects (e.g. their composition and size) transmit to green parts of plants and flowers. There, this information you can read through Biomolecular detector. There is no need to dig anything, you need only to study molecular biology.
But if you wish I can look for part value someday.

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by WM6

I believe that proposed "Mr. Stick" construction works terrible, but really don't like such Versace design. The value of elements as tunning procedure also missing.

There is no need to know the value of elements for the "Mr. Stick", because it comes fully assembled and working. So no need to construct from parts. The Mr. Stick is guaranteed to work as good as any commercially sold LRL.

The tuning procedure is explained on the web page. They say you only need to put a sample inside the "Mr. Egg" attachment for discrimination of diamonds, emeralds, paper currency and pharmaceuticals. I think they also say it will find gold, silver, platinum, copper, aluminum, zinc, steel and lead. See here: http://www.geocities.com/joe9999b/MR_STICK.html

Best wishes,
J_P

[Geo]

Hi J_P.
who is your opinion about samples???
When i use the L rods and i have a sample at my hand i have more success. Without sample i find every metal, rusts etc.
Also some LRLs have inside sample. So how it work????

Regards

[Max]

Originally Posted by Geo

Hi J_P.
who is your opinion about samples???
When i use the L rods and i have a sample at my hand i have more success. Without sample i find every metal, rusts etc.
Also some LRLs have inside sample. So how it work????

Regards

ideomotor, self-deception and selective memory ?

I mean... maybe when you have sample you feel more comfortable you can locate stuff better and discriminating also... then you dig holes... found same quantity of normal trash etc... but let mind act as selective filter... so you maybe think... ok I found a rusty horsehose there but was not concentrating enough maybe...

then, when endly find e.g. metal as in sample you think make it the right way.

You need to record any found item and compare with no-sample experience... but need big numbers... many attempts to have statistical value.

If so, I think people studing such things could be interested in your "power"... but I think you'll discover this way you find same kind of things with sample or without.

Try recording each found stuff... and make e.g. excel sheet with data to compare... that's my advice.

Kind regards,
Max

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by Geo

Hi J_P.
who is your opinion about samples???
When i use the L rods and i have a sample at my hand i have more success. Without sample i find every metal, rusts etc.
Also some LRLs have inside sample. So how it work????

Regards

Hi Geo,
I don't know if dowsing works or not. I know some respectable people who are scientists who know how to determine difference between trick of the mind and working, who says it works for them. So my opinion is maybe it works, and if it does, then it is not from idea motor, but from different principles that nobody has been able explain in an understandable way.

If there are people who find only random success with dowsing, but have convinced themselves they are finding better than random, then this is a trick of the mind, because maybe they forget to count their empty holes when concluding their dowsing is successful. For these people I think they are using ideamotor methods when they hold dowsing rods. And for these people dowsing does not work, even if they have a trick of the mind to make them believe it works.

But for people who actually find better than random success with dowsing, then I do not think they are using ideamotor principles. The people I have met who claim success are not interested in telling other people about their success, or arguing about whether it works or not, or how it works. They only use it for their own personal use when they think it can help.

But your question: Does a sample help find success with dowsing rods?
Answer: I don't know.
The people I know who claim success with dowsing do not use samples. These people use brass rods. If sample makes a difference, then maybe the brass in the rods will cause them to find only brass things? I don't think so. They use brass rods because these will not rust like steel rods from coat hangers that lose their paint. Unless I was to learn a principle that causes success in dowsing, I will not know if it helps to use a sample. But I think that if you are finding success with dowsing, and you find better success when using a sample, then you are wise to use a sample.

p.s.
I think it is ok to copy the sample chamber method from the "Mr. Stick" using the "Mr. Egg" attachment with rubber band connector. I do not see any patent information that prevents you from using this method to attach two samples. You can also expand this method to hold up to 12 samples if you want!

Best wishes,
J_P

[WM6]

Originally Posted by J_Player

There is no need to know the value of elements for the "Mr. Stick", because it comes fully assembled and working. So no need to construct from parts. The Mr. Stick is guaranteed to work as good as any commercially sold LRL.

The tuning procedure is explained on the web page. They say you only need to put a sample inside the "Mr. Egg" attachment for discrimination of diamonds, emeralds, paper currency and pharmaceuticals. I think they also say it will find gold, silver, platinum, copper, aluminum, zinc, steel and lead. See here: http://www.geocities.com/joe9999b/MR_STICK.html

Best wishes,
J_P

Very interestnig device.
Work this item on all continents or only in South America like Mineoro?

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by WM6

Very interestnig device.
Work this item on all continents or only in South America like Mineoro?

It is guaranteed to work as well as any Mineoro FG or DC series LRL in a double blind test, or you get your money back.

Best wishes,
J_P

[ma330]

hi dears:
this is a schematic lrl
your opinion about this schematic please?????

[Geo]

When i reversed the Vertec LRL, i found inside samples at two places.
Why????

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by ma330

hi dears:
this is a schematic lrl
your opinion about this schematic please?????

My opinion is this is easy to build. You can build it and test it to see if it works nicely.
Then you will have better information than any opinion that you can read here.

Best wishes,
J_P

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by Geo

When i reversed the Vertec LRL, i found inside samples at two places.
Why????

The reason you found those samples is because you reverse-engineered the Vertec.
You are not supposed to do that! Shhhhh....

Hahahaha

Best wishes,J_P

[Geo]

Originally Posted by J_Player

The reason you found those samples is because you reverse-engineered the Vertec.
You are not supposed to do that! Shhhhh....

Hahahaha

Best wishes,J_P

Regards

[Geo]

Originally Posted by J_Player

My opinion is this is easy to build. You can build it and test it to see if it works nicely.
Then you will have better information than any opinion that you can read here.

Best wishes,
J_P

Also you can tell us about the results

Regards