#126
|
||||
|
||||
Dear Geo thank you for your answer. I have OBMD-1 and i live near your city. My opinion is excelent machine for "lock" a no-ferrus interest target long distance.
You say ...you are present tests. I think you are not, because, i am present test near your city and i see users don't calibrate fine machine, but calibrate with high power. Users try find only gold. But the gold usually is "dream". After this the same machine make new test other city with success and maybe record a video (i am not sure). Only your fantasia you are present. This is incurious for me. But is not incurious for me, the effort to decrease something that you don't have. The conclusions are explicit Have you a "interest" area for test? If yes , maybe a user crypton can record a video your "interest" area. I want see video with succes and your rédicule face. I think you can not find this area, i think you have not this area, because, with a video all members world can see success, with your face. A!!!!!! I don't forget something . If you are anger or members understand all your negative efforts, you write Greek language. Why? regards
__________________
|
#127
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
For me, I will be happy if somebody brings me a detector to test. I will do like you did to see if it helps me to find treasures. Maybe for me I will make my own tests too. But I will not say the locator is successful for long range locating, and then complain that test is no good because the ground I choose for making the test is not a good test location. Anyway, I don't care about secret rumors from workers who do not make statements, and talk that nobody verify to be facts. But I see there is the test that happened in the Greek forum. And also I see Rubin makes his report for the Crypton. Now I have two reports from people who have actually used the Crypton to tell us they like the performance they see. And we hear Geo tell that the Crypton does not detect gold, silver or copper, but he did not use the Crypton. Maybe Geo can tell us how we can verify his claim that the Crypton detects magnetic fields anomalies. Maybe if Geo uses the Crypton in his hands then he will have a chance to make a report to tell what he sees the Crypton detect or does not detect. So I wait to hear more reports before I make my opinion for the Crypton. For now I am happy that some people like the Crypton. This means maybe there is a chance it will be good for treasure hunters. We can see more reports after the Crypton is used for more time in the field. Best wishes, J_P |
#128
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you ever decide to make a demonstration video, then I will be interested to see your video. And if you do not make a video, I still will like to hear your report for how the UBMD-1 works. Can you say if it detects only gold and silver and copper? Did you see the ONMD-1 detect iron or other metals? I am interested to know how this locator performs. Best wishes, J_P |
#129
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I cannot tell you if there was some silver or copper in that old bullet but I can tell you for sure that there was a lot more copper in that goats bell.That was big as a find but may be not that old. I threw away the bullet but I still got the bell. Regards g-sani |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Ειμαι διαθεσιμος ομως να τα ακουσω. Δεν βλεπω το λογο καποιος να εχει αποψη και να μην παιρνει θεση. Με παραξενευει το γεγονος οτι δεν μου το ειπες αυτο οταν σου ειπα οτι τεσταρω το Κρυπτον. I must translate this for everybody, it will be better. Sorry I don't know anything about what you are talking. I cannot confirm things that I don't really know. But I am willing to listen. I don't see a reason for somebody to have an experience whith Crypton and having a problem talking for it. I am now also curious George for that time you called me and you said nothing to me related to this matter when myself reported to you that I am having Crypton testing it. Was it something for me to hide from you? No it wasn't and I am not that complicated in my acts. I told you whithout you asking me that I am having Crypton for test e.tc., e.t.c.... and you asked my opinion for it but you never told me what you knew. Now you come over here saying that you knew this and that. No, this is not good. Sorry but I feel betrayed in some way. |
#131
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I never took this machine at my hands.... Read again......
__________________
Geo |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Geo |
#133
|
||||
|
||||
Hahahahahahaha.
When Esteban wrote about the Andy Flid magnetic field detector, he hear so many ....... Now you made the Andy Flid (MFD) the best detector. Yes, it is the Andy Flid magnetic field detector with a two transistors antenna preamplifier and a IR that makes nothing. But you can say and promote everything you want. I wait Max, so to give him the schematic with the IR so to study it and to tell us how it works....... I forecast a hot winter Regards
__________________
Geo |
#134
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Regards
__________________
Geo |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I make many-many personally tutorials tests before i am sure start search a target-area. Usually i work with my MD together. I explain you. First i find and lock target a place 1X1meter , then i use MD for find central point. I find many-many copper coins, a silver baby ring and two interest objects ( very low cost). For other metals ,i don't know. Maybe my hunting-area have not other metals. Some tests by me with iron, i see my machine cannot detect iron, cannot detect a magnet-piece, but can detect TV up 5meters distance. Sorry but i cannot publish photo's. I think you understand me. Max detection by me distance 25meters. Max depth 25cm. I work only a big flat place without trees. I cannot rec a video, because i have not camera for this regards
__________________
|
#136
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
One Crypton LRL with Andy Flind circuit for 3800 Euro !!! |
#137
|
||||
|
||||
Respect one another
Folks, I really don't understand what is goin on here. We, the LRL enthusiasts have been friends for a long time and now I see some of you making fun of others for developing their own LRLs? Are you people getting the skeptic's disease?
Well, I certainly hope not. But some behaviors here lately do remind me the skeptics and their agendas. Please don't fall in this trap. Geo, you and some others apparently have working LRLs already but why you are picking and making fun of Andreas' device? You people should join efforts and respect yourselves and not the other way around. I remember once when I, you, Esteban and Andreas traded emails for discussing new types of LRLs. When I asked if one of you had comercial intentions as I did not agree with this goal, you both told you did not. It's clear that you, him and Morgan are eager to start a comercial thing, but calm down. First thing you have to learn is ethics with you compatriots. Tough I don't agree with comercial intentions, I respect you and the others. So, folks, please consider quit being hostile with one another and start respect again the LRL people. As for Andreas' device, if it's indeed based on a magnetic field detector, I would not use a standard loop for this as there are much better sensor choices that would make a much better performance. But I respect his work and I think you and the others should do the same. Regars.
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths" |
#138
|
||||
|
||||
"... skeptic's disease?" ?
Skeptic's are the most healthy LRL enthusiasts in the world and best friends of LRL belivers. We protect LRL believers from evil scam artist and fraudsters.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence! |
#139
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, but it has very beautifull box.
__________________
Geo |
#140
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
1. I don't interesting for commercial products. 2.As you see was not me the person who had commercial intentions. 3.I have not any plywood with Andreas but very simple i like the true, and this lrl is not as the Crypton says. All are so simple....... Regards
__________________
Geo |
#141
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
it will be great for me in 2006 if someone offer me one LRL that work for the price 450 Euro i was very happy. but you know,i paid very big money for some mineoro,that the finds even pay for the batteries... |
#142
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you very much, much obliged.
|
#143
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You say the OBMD-1 is not as Crypton says. Is this your rumor, or do you have some evidence to show it is not as Crypton says? I read what Crypton says above: This machine is not a gold detector, but a long range discrimination locator without filter between Au,Ag,Cu.And here is what Andreas told us about the OBMD-1: Yes i draw a real LRL. This LRL detect only paramagnetic old buried metal and this LRL work with quarantee 100%.Later Andreas made a correction to say it does not detect paramagnetic, only gold, silver and copper: I write again "ONLY Au,Ag,Cu" Then I look at the reports from people who use the OBMD-1 in their hands to watch what it detects and does not detect. I see two reports that say it detects non-ferrous metals, but it does not detect iron. G-sani shows his video where he finds a bullet, and he says he detects non-ferrous things. And I read where Rubin posted in the forum: "I find many-many copper coins, a silver baby ring and two interest objects ( very low cost).Then I look at what you say about the OBMD-1 and I see you say it detects magnetic fields: "Now you made the Andy Flid (MFD) the best detector. Yes, it is the Andy Flid magnetic field detector with a two transistors antenna preamplifier and a IR that makes nothing"It is hard for me to imagine the OBMD-1 uses a magnetic field detector after I hear two people say they watched it locate non-ferrous things like coins and a bullet. Rubin said he cannot detect iron things or magnets with the OBMD-1. I read what the people who have the OBMD-1 in their hand report they can see report the OBMD-1 detects non-ferrous, and does not detect magnets or iron. Then I read where you report the OBMD-1 is an Andy Flind magnetic field detector with a 2-transistor antenna preamplifier. I ask now, can you show some evidence that the OBMD-1 is an Andy Flind design magnetic field detector? Or is the magnetic field detector circuit your rumor? Best wishes, J_P |
#144
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You know me many years, and now you ask me if what i say is my rumor????? Really i am sorry Regards
__________________
Geo |
#145
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I know you do not tell lie, and I know g-sani does not tell lie. So one of you is correct and other one is not correct for performance of the OBMD-1. You do not lie, but I see many times you make rumors of things you only think but you do not know for fact. Now I ask again. Is this story of Andy Flind circuit inside the OBMD-1 a rumor or do you have evidence you can show to prove this is a fact? Best wishes, J_P |
#146
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Do you know Andy Flind schematic????
__________________
Geo |
#147
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Regards
__________________
Geo |
#148
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Can you tell us what Andy Flind magnetic field detector parts you saw inside the box that g-sani used to locate only non-ferrous metal? Best wishes, J_P |
#149
|
||||
|
||||
May be I don't know the ccts inside but certainly only Andreas knows.
This is one fact and the other one is the finds I had testing it myself. Oh yes, this a fact for sure! |
#150
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Where i wrote that i detected magnets or anything else with this???? I wrote that this lrl is the Andy Flind Magnetic field detector. If you know the schematic of Andy Flind then if you reverse the pcb you will see that it is this schematic Regards
__________________
Geo |
|
|