NEW PD MADE IN GREECE - Page 5

WM6 · #**101** 08-28-2011, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

If we detect a coin from 3 or 5 m far and 30cm deep in the earth then who is your opinion???? Are we speak for LRL or not????

Regards

For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.

mikebg · #**102** 08-28-2011, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WM6

For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.

The results should be published here:
http://www.jir.com/

Morgan · #**103** 08-28-2011, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WM6

For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.

So i have only Midle Range Locators...

The LRL films are made with already known targets ,to save film time(less MGB´s) otherwise it will be very heavy film to email,10MGB is the limit.

WM6 · #**104** 08-28-2011, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morgan

So i have only Midle Range Locators...

The LRL films are made with already known targets ,to save film time(less MGB´s) otherwise it will be very heavy film to email,10MGB is the limit.

If working, middle range is far enough.

Waiting on film, hope there is experienced screenwriter behind.

Alexismex · #**105** 08-29-2011, 01:31 AM

For everyone..... in all the forum of metal detectors enthusiast
DETECTION of this small item in Silver o Gold (shoe) at one meter (i did not say two o four meters) and 30 cm deep is exceptional,
I will buy it in the instant........

Morgan · #**106** 08-29-2011, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

OK - that is a theory ... but there is no evidence to suggest that such a phenomenon exists. If it does exist, then you should be able to measure it using conventional equipment. At the present time no-one has done this, which tends to suggest that the theory is wrong.

Hello

I made a few PDK videos,the problem is the smaller with 40 MGB´s...
Imagine a full movie with searching,locating the target and digging the object...200 MGB´s
? This digital camera not mine,and cant make films less than this resolution.

Geo · #**107** 08-29-2011, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alexismex

For everyone..... in all the forum of metal detectors enthusiast
DETECTION of this small item in Silver o Gold (shoe) at one meter (i did not say two o four meters) and 30 cm deep is exceptional,
I will buy it in the instant........

Hi Alexis.
Nobody sell a workable LRL. I don't know if Alonso can sell one to you.

Regards

Qiaozhi · #**108** 08-29-2011, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morgan

Hello

I made a few PDK videos,the problem is the smaller with 40 MGB´s...
Imagine a full movie with searching,locating the target and digging the object...200 MGB´s
? This digital camera not mine,and cant make films less than this resolution.

There are many freeware programs available that can convert video files from one format to another. They also allow you to reduce the resolution to achieve a smaller file size.

Morgan · #**109** 08-29-2011, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

There are many freeware programs available that can convert video files from one format to another. They also allow you to reduce the resolution to achieve a smaller file size.

i will try that.

detectoman · #**110** 08-30-2011, 02:15 PM

hello morgan, alexismex sell m.d he personal project in mexico, he named topo p.i, he be the builder, these pi brious can detect deep he say, price is hig
may be alexismex look too the pd´s cloning

hola morgan alexismex es el vendedor en mexico, de su proyecto topo, que es un pulse induction, nos lo vende muy caro

Fred · #**111** 08-30-2011, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morgan

Hello

I made a few PDK videos,the problem is the smaller with 40 MGB´s...
Imagine a full movie with searching,locating the target and digging the object...200 MGB´s
? This digital camera not mine,and cant make films less than this resolution.

I have some experience in video editing if you need, and i can convert the edited video to any size.
I could even blurr faces or add some special effect

Morgan · #**112** 08-30-2011, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detectoman

hello morgan, alexismex sell m.d he personal project in mexico, he named topo p.i, he be the builder, these pi brious can detect deep he say, price is hig
may be alexismex look too the pd´s cloning

hola morgan alexismex es el vendedor en mexico, de su proyecto topo, que es un pulse induction, nos lo vende muy caro

Gracias por la informacion

Alexismex · #**113** 08-31-2011, 12:23 AM

Hello Morgan , see this post
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...383#post133383
, here i am with the Topo and minilogger in action

Geo · #**114** 08-31-2011, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WM6

For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.

I agree with you.
The Big mistake with lrls is that most users wants from a lrl to have the same behavior as a normal MD. From what i saw, when i accept a lrl that it works, i must accept and some problem that it has.

Fred · #**115** 08-31-2011, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

I agree with you.
The Big mistake with lrls is that most users wants from a lrl to have the same behavior as a normal MD. From what i saw, when i accept a lrl that it works, i must accept and some problem that it has.

Hi Geo,
Maybe one problem is that we never know what is being detected ?

Morgan · #**116** 08-31-2011, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alexismex

Hello Morgan , see this post
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...383#post133383
, here i am with the Topo and minilogger in action

This aparatus looks complicated to use in rough ground.Now i understand why you interested in LRL´s ;-)

Alexismex · #**117** 09-01-2011, 01:08 AM

It is not complicated..... it is like Pulse detector .... but is effective and tell you where is the metal .... also it is for that i am interested Iffffffffff this Pdk detect a small shoes at 35 cm deep and one meter distant ...........
you are very very rich now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Geo · #**118** 09-01-2011, 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred

Hi Geo,
Maybe one problem is that we never know what is being detected ?

Hi Fred.
Only with often digging we will learn a lrl.
There are lrls that detect objects from very far but have problem near to object, and there are lrls (as Alonsos PD) that have not the ability for far detecting but "goes" very close to the object. So we must know what we have at our hands.

Regards

Morgan · #**119** 09-01-2011, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alexismex

It is not complicated..... it is like Pulse detector .... but is effective and tell you where is the metal .... also it is for that i am interested Iffffffffff this Pdk detect a small shoes at 35 cm deep and one meter distant ...........
you are very very rich now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You will see the movie,how PDK is working

Morgan · #**120** 09-01-2011, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

Hi Fred.
Only with often digging we will learn a lrl.
There are lrls that detect objects from very far but have problem near to object, and there are lrls (as Alonsos PD) that have not the ability for far detecting but "goes" very close to the object. So we must know what we have at our hands.

Regards

Thats correct,and sometimes the signal seems to stay above the target,and when aproach the LRL to ground for pinpointing,it vanish...

Morgan · #**121** 09-01-2011, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred

I have some experience in video editing if you need, and i can convert the edited video to any size.
I could even blurr faces or add some special effect

Hi Fred

Even with program for MB reduction,the less i have in film is 23MGB...need to buy one digital camera with optional lower image resulution...
Do you have mail box enough for this MGB´s ?

Qiaozhi · #**122** 09-01-2011, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morgan

Hi Fred

Even with program for MB reduction,the less i have in film is 23MGB...need to buy one digital camera with optional lower image resulution...
Do you have mail box enough for this MGB´s ?

You could try www.dropbox.com for sharing files. You start off with a 2GB limit, so you would have to shrink your video files. But at least the capacity is beyond the file size limit for email.

By the way I'm assuming you meant to say 23GB ... or should that have 23MB. If it's the latter, then there's no problem.

Alexismex · #**123** 09-02-2011, 01:09 AM

Part one...two ....three......four....etc.....
We want to see the movie....

Fred · #**124** 09-02-2011, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morgan

Hi Fred

Even with program for MB reduction,the less i have in film is 23MGB...need to buy one digital camera with optional lower image resulution...
Do you have mail box enough for this MGB´s ?

Hi Morgan,
I have a gmail account, i think it accepts large files, (assuming you mean Mb, not Gb) but as Qiaozhi says sharing files should not be a problem.You can even send a dvd, flash disk (pen) or HD and i will send it back.
But the idea for a reasonable quality is not really to record in low resolution, but to reencode it after editing, compacting for a correct size/quality.

Morgan · #**125** 09-02-2011, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred

Hi Morgan,
I have a gmail account, i think it accepts large files, (assuming you mean Mb, not Gb) but as Qiaozhi says sharing files should not be a problem.You can even send a dvd, flash disk (pen) or HD and i will send it back.
But the idea for a reasonable quality is not really to record in low resolution, but to reencode it after editing, compacting for a correct size/quality.

Its MB´s not GB´s

You can send me PM with email for the LRL films,maybe you can make them shorter ,less MB´s.