LRL Ionic/Electrostatic energy field locator

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by humhum

Hi morgan,

When will ı see inside of Zolatoy LRL pictures.

This one is some metal detector who works together with powerfull proton magnetometer,as i told before,i sold this device...

[humhum]

Ok Morgan.

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by humhum

Ok Morgan.

TO EVERYBODY WHO DECIDE TO CONSTRUCT THE LRL BFO ANTENNAS,SHOULD SEND TO ME PM FOR MORE INFORMATION.

[humhum]

Hi Esteban , please send more photos (inside-near ) for this device or post block diagram.

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by Morgan

TO EVERYBODY WHO DECIDE TO CONSTRUCT THE LRL BFO ANTENNAS,SHOULD SEND TO ME PM FOR MORE INFORMATION.

It seams to me,i need to adapt other circuit for better electromagnetic resonance...

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by humhum

Hi Esteban , please send more photos (inside-near ) for this device or post block diagram.

Attachment 6922

Hi Esteban
Wath you have inside the white tube near the coil?
Its maybe empty...

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by Morgan

Hi Esteban
Wath you have inside the white tube near the coil?
Its maybe empty...Attachment 6923

[Geo]

Originally Posted by Morgan

Attachment 6925

The famous DCH....
The best Mineoro machine. It worked good, but Mineoro stop it.
Why????
Maybe Esteban knows to tell me
Regards

[Esteban]

Originally Posted by Geo

The famous DCH....
The best Mineoro machine. It worked good, but Mineoro stop it.
Why????
Maybe Esteban knows to tell me
Regards

There is better model called Oscillator 2000, similar than the DCH 85, and don't know if stop or not in production. And if not stop in production, don't know why isn't in the web page.

[Geo]

Originally Posted by Esteban

There is better model called Oscillator 2000, similar than the DCH 85, and don't know if stop or not in production. And if not stop in production, don't know why isn't in the web page.

Yes but why Mineoro stop DCH....
Do you know ?????

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by Geo

Yes but why Mineoro stop DCH....
Do you know ?????

????????????????????????????????
And it as less gold inside than other models...
It works better,so why they stop production?

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by Morgan

????????????????????????????????
And it as less gold inside than other models...
It works better,so why they stop production?

GOLD INSIDE???
I think i was dreaming

[Geo]

Originally Posted by Morgan

GOLD INSIDE???
I think i was dreaming

Maybe a sample.
But as i know, at Greece the DCH85 was a workable LRL, not as PDC....
There was a trik with the head and the DCH was special

[Esteban]

Originally Posted by Geo

Yes but why Mineoro stop DCH....
Do you know ?????

Also good old MDs stop in production and new sometimes are better or not.

[Geo]

Some people say that Mineoro did not wanted to produce a workable LRL and to give it at the market.

[hung]

Originally Posted by Geo

Some people say that Mineoro did not wanted to produce a workable LRL and to give it at the market.

The PDC project and the latest models are many times more powerful than the DCH. The DCH needed almost 100% of ionic emanations to detect. The PDC only 50%.

Testing both of them a couple of years ago in a ancient gold target, the PDC beeped clearly at 100 m distance. The DCH not a single beep even from 25 m.

According to a friend, the DCH needs a tweaking inside it to work better.

PS. Your sentence above is just absurd.

[Geo]

Originally Posted by hung

The PDC project and the latest models are many times more powerful than the DCH. The DCH needed almost 100% of ionic emanations to detect. The PDC only 50%.

Testing both of them a couple of years ago in a ancient gold target, the PDC beeped clearly at 100 m distance. The DCH not a single beep even from 25 m.

According to a friend, the DCH needs a tweaking inside it to work better.

PS. Your sentence above is just absurd.

I dont agree.
When they rubbed the front side of the head with some object, grows the sensitivity and could detect objects from long distance. Pdc does not can detect from long distance, at least here at Greece. So DCH.. is better !!!!

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by hung

The PDC project and the latest models are many times more powerful than the DCH. The DCH needed almost 100% of ionic emanations to detect. The PDC only 50%.

Testing both of them a couple of years ago in a ancient gold target, the PDC beeped clearly at 100 m distance. The DCH not a single beep even from 25 m.

According to a friend, the DCH needs a tweaking inside it to work better.

PS. Your sentence above is just absurd.

Hi Hung

Can you explain me what is a tweaking?

Regards

[Esteban]

Originally Posted by Geo

I dont agree.
When they rubbed the front side of the head with some object, grows the sensitivity and could detect objects from long distance. Pdc does not can detect from long distance, at least here at Greece. So DCH.. is better !!!!

Because static is part of the explanation. But how do you know it?

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by hung

The PDC project and the latest models are many times more powerful than the DCH.

If the result is zero, then it doesn't matter if the next model is several times more powerful (whatever means) the result will still be zero.

Originally Posted by Morgan

Can you explain me what is a tweaking?

He means "to make an small adjustment".
Should make a big difference.

[Geo]

Originally Posted by Esteban

Because static is part of the explanation. But how do you know it?

I agree. I know one of the owners that made this trik

[humhum]

Where are you ???

[rajesh]

Originally Posted by Morgan

Yes,we made like this because its logical,and you said it woks.
And i can see in this photo you use near the coil some kind of IONIC CHAMBER. I know also,that its possible to polarize one gold leaf inside the tube. This will make device more selective to find only GOLD !!!
Can you teach,how to do this ionic chamber?

regards

.................................................. .................................................. .........any body use this link ........rajesh...
HOMEABOUTFAQCLAIMSHISTORYRULESCONTACTPROFILESHOPPING
Start

Welcome to the GROHE Circle of Excellence Program!

[FONT='Arial Narrow','sans-serif']Please select from the following options: [/FONT]

• [FONT='Arial Narrow','sans-serif']Click here if you know your username and password from the 2007 Appreciating the Finest to update your account and transfer your points. [/FONT]

[FONT='Arial Narrow','sans-serif'] USERNAMES AND PASSWORDS ARE CASE SENSITIVE. INCORRECT USE OF CASE WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO LOG IN. [/FONT]

• [FONT='Arial Narrow','sans-serif']If you do not know your username and password from the 2007 Appreciating the Finest program, please call 888-746-9371.
  [/FONT]
• [FONT='Arial Narrow','sans-serif']If you are new to the GROHE Circle of Excellence program and were not participating in the 2007 Appreciating the Finest program please click here to enroll.
  [/FONT]
• [FONT='Arial Narrow','sans-serif']If you have already enrolled, or updated your account and transferred your points please click here to log in and enter claims. [/FONT]

LOGOUTTERMSPRIVACYGrohe Circle of Excellence Powered by RewardTrax®

[Morgan]

Originally Posted by Morgan

Attachment 6798
PCB1

L2= 18 cm x 11 cm BFO coil made of 12 or 15 turns,wire 0,25 mm. No Faraday Shield.


PCB2

L1= Big Aluminium Antenna 22 cm x 30 cm(ion detector 1)
L2=Small single turn,copper antenna 8cm x 4cm ,Ion detector 2(this one fixed in the wood box,behind the BFO coil).

I think i become tyred of this LRL crap...

Esteban,you are afraid of wath?
You can see here this shematic,is ok to put there? or better the other?

Chose between them...

Itry to delete,sorry,not happens

Already send message to Carl

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by Morgan

I think i become tyred of this LRL crap...

Hmmm...
Didn't Qiaozhi once say this too?

Best wishes,
J_P