|
|
#51
10-13-2006, 09:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
try to stay off replying on my posts or...
:mad:
"I think your problems are so that you mostly use borrowed devices which not belong to yourself.It's obvious a detectorist should work for a while to understand his detector language and behaviors not transient of others..." First you are acusing me to be ignorant who only borrows devices from others for hour or two and according to that short experience acts like expert..... Than you posted.... "I intended not disrespect you and never have done this, this is clear in my post am astonished why you wrote so!!!" What else could be disrespect than what you posted above???? What do you expect.....You are making me ignorant and than wait me to thank you???? Michael...RObert,Ivconic and SOny already "gave you foot"....now is my turn! Do not reply on my posts and good by michael...I do not "peak" you, you must not "peak" me....Deal? :mad: 
|
|
#52
10-13-2006, 09:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As you can readily see, any ions that have migrated to the surface are incapable of detaching themselves from the soil and floating off on the wind, and eventuallly finding themselves sucked into the sensor of a Mineoro. In any case, gold does emit ions, even if it's buried for a million years.
|
|
#53
10-13-2006, 11:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No necessary to floating, I never said these ions are floating. I said there are an electric difference in the soil capable to be detect. The company uses chemical method for to evaluate commercial possibilities. But you can use electronic methods.
In any case, gold does emit ions, even if it's buried for a million years. This is the same opinion of Carl. The page don't specify about what kind of ions can migrates, but YOU know!!!! Can you asure? Can you demonstrate? Can you show me a page wich demonstrates your aseveration? The theme is this: mobile metalic ions in the soil from depth. No more. Yes, I post twice.
|
|
#56
10-14-2006, 06:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hawk!
first; I not more stay off you. push this in your ear. If I showed already as very "pesty" what have you shown yourself? a witan, a polite? no , a "pollutant Virus". About Robert, Sony all are the same one person YOU.... If you want to "give a foot" no problem, surely will get it return more intensified. and from now I won't sit and undergo your pejoratives or any body . but Ivconic personality is different of you. at least is more polite than you and somewhere put some useful info and helped us thanks him, but what's your quale? just some battling, humiliating, spitting,........... a heavy dossier. oh pardon me for this tone, again you were faulty pushed me to it. back to subject; from BORROWED ... I really had no intention to disrespect you, as I seriously thought it's so, you could simply deny it and I apologized you. not to answer angrily. if you got so I apologize you. we could share our info. anyway you before mentioned about Future 2005 it doesn't concerns to emfad and no I'm not high genius to talk about what have no experience with. I don't know about it's graph. my purpose of putting the pics was to compare them. they are from the same exact place with constant field length and searched surface, 1,2 E/W and 3 N/S direction. there is a well that opening is buried about 1 meters under ground. just in N/S see the right shape of cavity whereas it's round. then we can focus to change searching to N/S dir.....and.... I wanted to continue this discussion to mineoro and even MDind..... but you broke this discussion and pulled it to nowhere, spoiled it. for what ? nothing, just because you don't like me for a very idle purposes. it could be good discussion. anyway if here is person who have experiences with future series We can share info each other.
|
|
#60
05-14-2009, 09:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hi Esteban  Please upload or send me DCH manual . Thanks for trouble Best regards
|
|
#62
05-14-2009, 06:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Portuguese... spanish... whatever... the problem is that what's in the manual is pseudo-science at best!  I think he's interested anyway... cause translators exist...  But, of course, why I made such a post ???  Better I will focus back on serious things... like understanding how the hell a rodent repeller can be converted to a working LRL... seems too new-age issue but probably Alonso made it happens in the 70's... Anyway, what about your cousin Alonso !? Hope he's well... I'd like to hear from him directly about these wonderful (hopefully) technologies of lrl... and how to make such funky things with so few resources.... Anyway, kind regards to mr. Alonso too!  Max
__________________
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim... But we dont need a reason " someone said...
|
|
#63
05-15-2009, 02:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#64
05-15-2009, 05:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi.
Before about 15 years, one electronic engineer made a LRL with ultrasonic. He used a depth-meter for boats, he put inside 2 pcbs and the detector had the ability to detect 1kgr thin papers of gold at 100m. He made some clones (about 10) but all had the same problems, bad stability and burned a transistor. Now i cant find any clone of this ultrasonic detector. I try for it at least 5 years ago. The ultrasonic depth-meter was a Conion firm with a AM radio on it. The one pcb was a oscillator but the other ????  I wrote all these to say that i agree with Esteban, ultrasonic work for lrl but i dont know yet How???? Regards
__________________
Geo
|
|
#66
05-16-2009, 12:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Have not in English. Maybe can be scaned with OCR in word and translated to English. Regards Esteban
|
|
#67
05-16-2009, 02:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Please give me DCH 85 manual. I will try it with translator. Thanks for trouble you have taken in the matter. BEST REGARDS.
|
|
#68
05-18-2009, 03:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
For the persons that understand Portuguese and Spanish, maybe Italian, the manual. Enter the code and wait the counter ends and download:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=K1066GRC
|
|
#69
05-18-2009, 06:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hi Esteban THNKING SO MUCH . Best regards.
|
|
#70
05-18-2009, 01:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is in concordance with the famous column of ions: emission of ionic vertical lines, translated from the Portuguese, in red square mark.
I'm ultrashure that exists a kind of emission from this targets buried for long time!
|
|
#71
05-18-2009, 04:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#72
05-18-2009, 06:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The machine absorpts the "emission". I build a 3 antennas instrument used in origin for to enlarge a short signal million times, so this circuit was capable for to capture "the phenomenon". This instrument reveals very sensitive and stable at the point that "the phenomenon" caused for an old rifle 7.62 cartridge, used in a revolution of 1947, for example, shows a big angle in detection, but no much distance, this is "infernal" in the nearby, but when I pass the "emission area", the detection stops. Is some difficult find the target, but is there. Lead produce short beep and only you found the lead targets when you pass over it. When I build it, the first time, detect very well an oxidated nail, and I "cure" it with 15-18 megohm resistor.
Once, I walk and obtain a signal with continuity, but at short distance. I watch in the site and saw a hollow in a tree at the level of the soil. So, I "aimed" the antenna towards it and detection was more strong. Was caused by stainless steel coin and at first time was detected in lateral position! This coin material is very good and is rare to found attacked by oxidation. When you experiment and go in the field, you can obtain response of such "phenomenon". Regards Esteban
|
|
#73
05-18-2009, 06:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
llevas razón Esteban, I should quit my chair and go to the field.Computer radiation is not good anyway...
|
|
#75
05-18-2009, 08:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
 The Wallet-Miner's Creed Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
|
 |
|
|
...
Linear Mode
