|
|
#26
12-18-2011, 08:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I will try to give photos and schematic at a new thread. 
__________________
Geo 
|
|
#27
12-18-2011, 09:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Here suggested realisation design:
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#29
12-18-2011, 10:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#30
12-18-2011, 11:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Scroll to bottom of page. Download "The Sprint-Layout Viewer" View properties of viewlayout50.exe and tick the "Allow executing file as program" box, or use "su chmod 777 viewlayout50.exe" on the command line. Start viewlayout50.exe and open the .LAY file. File can be viewed in Ubuntu Linux, no problem.  Note - you must have WINE installed for this to work.
|
|
#31
12-18-2011, 11:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have installed Wine and it works fine. I am simply not interested to install additional software to view only what others wont pop-up in his posts. If others are lazy, I am lazy too.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#35
12-20-2011, 01:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geo,
Regarding the PLL circuit, their is one that has the input going to one hand and the other input going to the other hand(with brass dowsing rods in each hand). I don't know if that is the circuit you built with no results but the one I describe here works on the basis of detecting changes in the brains waves in response to locating said target-not using the 567 to detect any VLF waves just so you know. I remember buying that PLL schematic off some site that sells plans and I recognized how it worked once I thought about it. In that case it could possibly work (detecting the change in brain waves-alpha versus beta,etc.). All speculation though, Randy Seden God's Country,California
|
|
#36
12-20-2011, 08:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Please explain the workings of the circuit for me? How to help brass rods? What makes a beep? whith respect
|
|
#37
12-20-2011, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
At the end, dowser do not need to know how dowsing rod works, it is enough that those rods works for him as dowsing rods. So, make it and you will get all answers. It is very cheap and simple to use. And what is most important: works the same on all continents. If you wish to discuss here your construction from your photo, then you need to post here at least shematic you use.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#38
12-21-2011, 12:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am surprised to see you consider the frequencies for gold and silver to be Au 5K, Ag 8.7K.  If I recall you previously said the MFD should be adjusted to the NMR frequency which is somewhere less than 60 Hz for gold here: http://www.longrangelocators.com/for...471#post125471 After a lot of discussion and research we figured all the details for calculating the correct NMR frequencies for gold and silver. A summary can be found here: http://www.longrangelocators.com/forums/showthread.php?p=125686#post125686 Throughout that topic, you agreed that you use your magnetometer to take a reading where you are hunting for treasure before you adjust your frequency. And you use frequencies for gold somewhere in the range of 32 Hz, not 5000 Hz. You say in that post that you use 81 Hz for silver.... not 8.7K: "Lets say Ag @ 47000 nt is 80.99 hz. At 47010.5 it's not changed much but to 81.0. In my area the most it changes is about .1 hz from day to day". We actually find that the NOAA daily averages for Chauvin, LA is average of 35,067.4 nT, not 47,000 nT. The final gold formula reduces to NMR Frequency = nT measured at location/1339.8. This calculates to a NMR frequency of 26.17 Hz for gold in the average earth magnetic field of Chauvin, LA today. But we know the actual NMR frequency will vary between 16Hz and 50 Hz depending on where you are hunting for treasure in the Chauvin area. This is because the magnetic field daily averages are only averages, and do not take into account the big variations in earth magnetic fields when we walk a few meters distance. The actual earth field strength often doubles when we walk 100 feet distance across a treasure hunting field. So, unless we actually measure the magnetic field strength within a few feet of where we are searching for treasure, we cannot know what is the NMR frequency of gold or any other element. But if we do measure the actual magnetic field strength, we will find that the true NMR frequency for gold is between 16Hz and 50Hz for different location in the Chauvin area. We will see that the NMR frequency cannot possibly rise above 50 Hz unless we introduce a very strong artificial magnetic field at the location where the metal is buried. In order for the NMR frequency of gold to reach 5000 Hz, the gold must be in a magnetic field 191 times stronger than the average earth field of the earth in Chauvin, LA. This means 5000 Hz cannot possibly be the NMR frequency of gold buried in the ground unless you put a very large and expensive coil to make a huge magnetic field where the gold is buried. The same is true for silver. The two NMR frequencies for stable silver isotopes are 69.44 Hz and 60.40 Hz in the magnetic field we see in Chauvin, LA today. These frequencies are not 8.7K...! In no case will we ever see the NMR frequency of gold or silver rise over 100 Hz without putting the metal in a very strong magnetic field. The true NMR gold frequency is closer to what Geo says --- "...i use 34Hz for Au" My question is: Have you changed your mind to think that the NMR frequency of gold and silver have now been changed to the KHz frequencies instead of 18-100 Hz frequencies? Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#39
12-21-2011, 01:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Bringing metal detectors into the world of imaging! 
|
|
#40
12-21-2011, 01:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yes, I did notice you said "so they say". This is why I was wondering what you actually think. I see from your previous post you said you think "they" are wrong: Quote:
Or did you change your idea to think that KHz are the NMR frequencies for gold and silver? Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#41
12-21-2011, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
this is true .... that is a testament to the combination was something starts working! maybe we should begin thinking about how he works; What makes resistance to a battery which gives as your STRONG signals; and only the battery is not working; What really should do; and what exactly;
|
|
#42
12-21-2011, 01:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think they are using harmonics of these frequencies. The differences between 8.7k and 8.1k may be the difference in location. If I use the next step up for gold 69.96hz is very close to what I measure using ring theory 70.06hz. So for gold here my body responds the best on the first harmonic for gold.
__________________
Bringing metal detectors into the world of imaging!
Last edited by Tim Williams; 12-21-2011 at 01:39 PM. Reason: add
|
|
#43
12-21-2011, 03:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Geo.
This is another device i will like to try, so if you can share us a good and woking schematic, will be amazing. Did your got some theasures with this device? Regards Nelson Quote:
|
|
#44
12-21-2011, 03:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi WM6
Can you post your Livewire file for this shematic? Also, does it work for you? Are the generator stable? Thanks a lot and best regards my friend Nelson Quote:
|
|
#45
12-21-2011, 04:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I tried to find the schematic but i was not lucky  .As i remember there was a brass wire from one hand to the other. At the middle of the wire we take the signal. I tried it for long time without results. If some time i will be more lucky and find the schematic i"ll attach it here. I had find the schematic at Geotech Regards
__________________
Geo
|
|
#46
12-21-2011, 05:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I found it at Geotech. Enjoy http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showpost.php?p=41314&postcount=1
__________________
Geo
|
|
#47
12-21-2011, 05:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Posting on Livewire will be of little use if you cannot read .CWZ format which I have in origin. This was reason that I conwert all in .JPG format to make it available to all. Circuit works as electronic dowsing rod without problem and as good as any other expensive electronic dowsing rod. I did not test it in field because I am not a dowser and cannot find nothing with dowsing rods ever. If you are born dowser maybe it can work for you, otherwise left it in peace and make something like GG AL718 which is at least theorethical step in LRL direction. Generator shematic is jack's idea not my, I only add antenna solution. I think it can work stable enough for this purposses.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#48
12-21-2011, 05:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think to put here the full project. Maybe next week. But I have a dilemma, to put this project or to put the schematic of Cryfton??? Next week I will know. It will be a gift for the new year. Regards
__________________
Geo
|
|
#49
12-21-2011, 11:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Right decision. Why not both?
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#50
12-22-2011, 02:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think the full schematic is already shown in the Geotech forum. You can see it here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...314&#post41314 Scroll up and down the page to see the schematic and photos of the construction. Also I am wondering why Geotech keeps dowsing schematics in the Geotech forum when they want all dowsing and LRL to be in this forum? Best wishes, J_P
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
