LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 11-27-2008, 11:03 AM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default GOLD

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player View Post
Electric emissions from long time buried metal are a result of ions formed in damp soil when combining with other compounds in the soil that can dissolve trace amounts of the metal. If gold is contained inside of an iron box, or a plastic box, or any other box that prevents the gold from coming into contact with the damp soil and the chemicals that can dissolve trace amounts of gold, then there will be no electric emissions, as there are no gold ions in the soil.

I would think the best way to overcome this is to bury the gold without any iron box to prevent it from contacting the soil and creating trace amounts of gold ions.*

*(This solution will work ONLY if the trace amounts of gold ions that dissolve into the damp soil become concentrated enough to create an anomaly in the soil that can be detected with an instrument that is capable of detecting secondary effects associated with the presence of these ions).

Best wishes,
J_P
Hello J_P

It seames you know a lot of secrets about metal in the ground...
My theory is :

1-THE GOLD AND SILVER ACUMULATE MUCH MORE ENERGY THAN OTHER METALS,when buried underground for many years.

2- THERE ARE MUCH MORE ELECTRIC EMISSIONS FROM THE BURIED NOBLE METALS THAN OTHER METALS.

3-The Pistoldetector is sensitive to changes of variations in ground electric field,so it can detect the ELECTRIC EMISSIONS coming from buried metals,becouse the PASSIVE RECEIVER WAS MADE TO CATCH THIS PHENOMENON.And this phenomenon you mention above,and for sure its cientificly proved...Your next step is start believe in some LRL devices
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-27-2008, 11:15 AM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default GOLD

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player View Post
A VLF detector is only capable of detecting things that will change the magnetic effects of the search coil. It does not detect any chemicals unless they can generate eddy currents that allow changes to the magnetic effects. The chemicals that are known to allow eddy currents to form are the metals that conduct electricity, such as copper, nickel, iron, aluminum, gold, silver, etc., and mixtures of these metals.

It is theoretically possible that when searching in non-conductive soil that has an area where there is an anomaly of very conductive soil, a VLF detector may be able to detect the conductivity change in this area of soil. This means the conductivity of the "conductive area of the soil" must be similar to the conductivity of a metal object. But I have not seen any testing results that demonstrated there are areas of "more-conductive soil" that were detectable with a VLF detector. The only exception is soil that has "hot rocks" or pockets of conductive sands in it, or in very iron-rich soil similar to the soil found in the Australian gold fields. These areas that have pockets of "more conductive soil" do not produce treasures, but only areas of conductive rocks and sands.

Best wishes,
J_P
You know why the pistoldetector catch this ELECTRIC EMISSIONS FROM BURIED METALS ? Becouse as the PASSIVE RECEIVER,circuit very sensitive to electric and electromagnetic fields.
And my theory is that the GOLD as much stronger electric emissions than other metals. The Gold acumulate much more energy ,but other metals acumulate and irradiate less energy.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-27-2008, 12:03 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgan View Post
You know why the pistoldetector catch this ELECTRIC EMISSIONS FROM BURIED METALS ? Becouse as the PASSIVE RECEIVER,circuit very sensitive to electric and electromagnetic fields.
And my theory is that the GOLD as much stronger electric emissions than other metals. The Gold acumulate much more energy ,but other metals acumulate and irradiate less energy.
I have my doubts... As gold corrode (no corrode, except "low gold") less than other metals as bronze or copper, is more difficult to be detectable at distance, except if you can build device with high selectivity. Except treasure size or cache, small gold items are reluctance... Bronze and copper and even silver coins not pure (mixed with copper) are more "ease". With absorptive method found a silver 1797 Spanish coin (some "black" for the time), but just five times can be detected and fix the site. No more than 4 meters and depth 20 cm.

Regards

Esteban
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-27-2008, 02:40 PM
Clondike Clad's Avatar
Clondike Clad Clondike Clad is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 393
Default How do you pinpoint?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
Finish and works great! Treasure can't scape of it! Is easy to mount in a plate (in this case, fiber glass), all are at hand. Radio is not use here, just amplificative stages.

Regards

Esteban
How can you tell gold from silver with this?
Can you pick up rings and how far?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-27-2008, 05:23 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clondike Clad View Post
How can you tell gold from silver with this?
Can you pick up rings and how far?
No at high distance, just 5 meters. Better for big items as treasure.

Now I replace magnetic speaker by piezo, this not disturb as speaker based on coil and magnet. Also consumption is lowest.

Now, I'll replace the audio amp of radio by circuit based on NE5534 or similar. This is just for to try ferrite.

Regards

Esteban
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 11-27-2008, 06:01 PM
maimoune maimoune is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
Default

hi Esteban
Very intersted
good luck
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-27-2008, 06:49 PM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
No at high distance, just 5 meters. Better for big items as treasure.

Now I replace magnetic speaker by piezo, this not disturb as speaker based on coil and magnet. Also consumption is lowest.

Now, I'll replace the audio amp of radio by circuit based on NE5534 or similar. This is just for to try ferrite.

Regards

Esteban
So, you will connect the ferrite directly to the 5534 ?????
Or you will use the first preamlifier with transistors??
Regards
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-27-2008, 09:20 PM
Clondike Clad's Avatar
Clondike Clad Clondike Clad is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
No at high distance, just 5 meters. Better for big items as treasure.

Now I replace magnetic speaker by piezo, this not disturb as speaker based on coil and magnet. Also consumption is lowest.

Now, I'll replace the audio amp of radio by circuit based on NE5534 or similar. This is just for to try ferrite.

Regards

Esteban
If I got this you can pick up ring a 5 meters.
If this is so it can pick up Carl's 10oz gold bar.
THAT IS $25,000 YOU CAN GET.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-27-2008, 09:46 PM
gef12's Avatar
gef12 gef12 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
Finish and works great! Treasure can't scape of it! Is easy to mount in a plate (in this case, fiber glass), all are at hand. Radio is not use here, just amplificative stages.

Regards

Esteban
Hey Esteban what country do you live in .. let me think it is the tropical region somewhere
__________________
73's Regards Gef
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-27-2008, 10:56 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo View Post
So, you will connect the ferrite directly to the 5534 ?????
Or you will use the first preamlifier with transistors??
Regards
I prefer 2 transistor pre connected to NE5534 or similar IC.

Regards

Esteban
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-27-2008, 10:58 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clondike Clad View Post
If I got this you can pick up ring a 5 meters.
If this is so it can pick up Carl's 10oz gold bar.
THAT IS $25,000 YOU CAN GET.
Thanks very much!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-27-2008, 11:00 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gef12 View Post
Hey Esteban what country do you live in .. let me think it is the tropical region somewhere
Since 3 days we have 44-45 ºC at sun, in the street, here in Paraguay, South America.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-28-2008, 04:24 AM
Geo's Avatar
Geo Geo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
I prefer 2 transistor pre connected to NE5534 or similar IC.

Regards

Esteban
Good. For me is better to use a preampl all with transistors and in dc coupling. It has better slew rate !!! A good pre is the audio prelude from Elektor

Regards
__________________
Geo
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-28-2008, 06:16 AM
maimoune maimoune is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
Default

hello Esteban...

good job
I see your near to build an perfecte LRL
I would be the first to buy your devices
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-28-2008, 10:10 AM
nelson's Avatar
nelson nelson is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 466
Default

Gracias hermano, estamos en conracto.
Atte.
Nelson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
No me olvido, solo que quiero también terminar cosas que empecé.

Saludos

Esteban
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-28-2008, 12:39 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo View Post
Good. For me is better to use a preampl all with transistors and in dc coupling. It has better slew rate !!! A good pre is the audio prelude from Elektor

Regards
The prelude is the sintetizer or what? I remember it...

Regards

Esteban
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-29-2008, 04:09 AM
aft_72005's Avatar
aft_72005 aft_72005 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The empire of Cyrus the great...Iran
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
The prelude is the sintetizer or what? I remember it...

Regards

Esteban
Hi Esteban
Not synthesizer, prelude ,name of amplifier article ,published
By elector magazine .also at far past.
Best regards.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-29-2008, 12:40 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aft_72005 View Post
Hi Esteban
Not synthesizer, prelude ,name of amplifier article ,published
By elector magazine .also at far past.
Best regards.
Thanks very much!

Best regards

Esteban
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-29-2008, 01:00 PM
Esteban's Avatar
Esteban Esteban is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Heart of South America
Posts: 2,454
Default

This is the Prelude, +15/0/-15V
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-29-2008, 05:23 PM
Max's Avatar
Max Max is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mars (cool)
Posts: 2,684
Default the serious questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
This is the Prelude, +15/0/-15V
Hi Esteban,
I read some older posts in this thread and seems you made a double ferrite antenna with a coil over one half, shield and cable... spacing 5mm.

OK, let me think you are talking about some VLF receiver , say some tens kilohertz, and remember me something already seen somewhere.

But what I do not understand is wich kind of signal you're looking for: 3 questions cover the topic I think at 100%.

Does the buried gold emits RF waves ?
Or the buried gold absorb some outside generated RF waves ?
Or the buried gold enhance/focalize some outside generated RF waves ?

If your device works, one of the above questions you must answer with "yes".

Otherwise I see no way that the device could work by means of being a pure RF / VLF receiver, no matter of "how" that action is performed.

Kind regards,
Max
__________________

"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason
"

someone said...
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-29-2008, 07:31 PM
hung's Avatar
hung hung is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In LRL Land
Posts: 1,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post
Does the buried gold emits RF waves ?
Or the buried gold absorb some outside generated RF waves ?
Or the buried gold enhance/focalize some outside generated RF waves ?

Max
I'm almost positive anybody in the remote sensing forum following this subject for years knows the answers for these simple questions.
Why not you?

'The truth is not out there'... It was always in here...
Sorry I couldn't resist.
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-29-2008, 09:22 PM
Fred's Avatar
Fred Fred is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: On a island
Posts: 2,176
Default

Carefull Esteban, daddy is watching ...
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-30-2008, 12:17 AM
J_Player's Avatar
J_Player J_Player is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hung
I'm almost positive anybody in the remote sensing forum following this subject for years knows the answers for these simple questions.
Why not you?
Hmmmm...
I have been reading the remote sensing forum for years, and I don't know for certain how Esteban believes this ferrite machine works either. Specifically, I don't know what kind of signal Esteban believes his ferrite amplifier is responding to.

You have demonstrated yourself to be very knowledgeable about these things after explaining that an iron box shields emissions from long time buried gold. Since you're almost positive anybody in the remote sensing forum following this subject for years knows the answers for these simple questions, can you tell us exactly what Esteban's ferrite is responding to when near long time buried gold?

Best wishes,
J_P
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-30-2008, 03:06 AM
aft_72005's Avatar
aft_72005 aft_72005 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The empire of Cyrus the great...Iran
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban View Post
This is the Prelude, +15/0/-15V

Hi Esteban
Yes, it is prelude amplifier .if I think true, also it was
With preamplifier. This is ,only amplifier.
Also in hi fi world, prelude had very good specification.
Best regards.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-30-2008, 02:48 PM
Qiaozhi's Avatar
Qiaozhi Qiaozhi is offline
Guru (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post
Hi Esteban,
I read some older posts in this thread and seems you made a double ferrite antenna with a coil over one half, shield and cable... spacing 5mm.

OK, let me think you are talking about some VLF receiver , say some tens kilohertz, and remember me something already seen somewhere.

But what I do not understand is wich kind of signal you're looking for: 3 questions cover the topic I think at 100%.

Does the buried gold emits RF waves ?
Or the buried gold absorb some outside generated RF waves ?
Or the buried gold enhance/focalize some outside generated RF waves ?

If your device works, one of the above questions you must answer with "yes".

Otherwise I see no way that the device could work by means of being a pure RF / VLF receiver, no matter of "how" that action is performed.

Kind regards,
Max
Quote:
Originally Posted by hung View Post
I'm almost positive anybody in the remote sensing forum following this subject for years knows the answers for these simple questions.
Why not you?

'The truth is not out there'... It was always in here...
Sorry I couldn't resist.
The hidden message in Hung's words is (since the answer is as obvious as the nose on your face) that you must be incredibly dumb to ask such a question.

Of course, "we" all know the real answer...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.