Examiner Results: AC and DC variations

[Max]

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

Hi Max,

Have you looked at Carl's report on the RT Examiner? There is no hi-impedance amplifier inside the plastic case. There is just a jumbled collection of bits and pieces soldered together and hot glued in place.
If you place the leads of a digital multimeter close to a calculator, there is no pickup whatsoever, as long as you move away from these two items, and allow the readings to stabilize (to zero).

Well done J_P on an excellent description of what's really going on here.

There is definitely some electromagnetic interference (EMI) coming from the calculator, and this can indeed be detected by a small coil connected to an amplifier. However, this is not the case with the Examiner, which has been sadly totally misunderstood by Hung, unless (of course) you confer with the idea that the standard Maxwell-Heaviside model is erroneous because it omits the spin resonance.

Hi,
no I haven't : actually I don't know what's inside the RT device... just saw the antenna on front side and was thinking there's some hi-impedance amplifier like in zahori circuits.

Now I see it isn't that way.

Kind regards,
Max

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by Max

Hi,
no I haven't : actually I don't know what's inside the RT device... just saw the antenna on front side and was thinking there's some hi-impedance amplifier like in zahori circuits.

Now I see it isn't that way.

Kind regards,
Max

Hi Max,

I thought perhaps you hadn't seen it.

In case anyone else needs to examine the insides of an Examiner (pun intended), here it is -> http://geotech.thunting.com/cgi-bin/...iner/index.dat

[Fred]

Hi,
Here i send a proof that my LRL is working better than Hung´s:
Left, Hung wife´s hands.
Right, one of my numerous wifes hand.
Who needs better proof ?
Fred.

[VikingAlex827]

Originally Posted by Fred

Hi,
Here i send a proof that my LRL is working better than Hung´s:
Left, Hung wife´s hands.
Right, one of my numerous wifes hand.
Who needs better proof ?
Fred.

I stand convinced. -

[Clondike Clad]

Originally Posted by hung

My initial claim was that voltage variances were found inside the examiner and could be measured.
Bellow I offer pictures and narrations of such which corroborates that. Actually this always was normal and expectable in my view, but what was not normal and expected was the very unusual results when performing tests regarding DC variances which were not predicted at all and it was a big surprise. This will be covered in the last part of this report.

All tests here can be easily replicated by any examiner user, provided he owns a multimeter (4 digit display better) and some spare time. Variances are minimum although clearly demonstrated.
For this, I suggest an automatic multimeter. It is more sensitive and with a longer sustained delay
making the readings more precise.
In fact, for the DC test this is the only model which will provide accurate results.

Multimeter used was an ICEL MD 5011 fully automatic model.

With that said let’s go into it.

All I can see is the bull is still dropping the $hi+.
When is this crap going to END