#26
|
||||
|
||||
The problem with these T/R searches is that you can not have anything metallic on you, otherwise you alone generate false signals. So a plastic digging tool or hunting for two.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I am interested in precise explanations of it's working principles. Not generally explained, but in exact details. For example; i would like to know how they calculated coupling relation between Al loop and small coil inside it? What relation? What is resonance of Al loop? What happening if loop was with different sizes? What are merrits and what drawbacks from such coupling. Is loop size dependable on working frequency and how? How possibly that loop can be suitable for such low frequency? Is it the coupled coil the one which solving that issue? Working frequency in relation to all of that? Etc..etc... Wild guess: instead Al loop, why not use another coil coupled with existing one on ferrite rod? Depths will be lower but better directional sensitivity maybe achieved? Other type of coupling? Coil? Following simiillar logic we can come to conclusion that any other nonmotion metal detector can also be easilly adapted to work as 2 box? Right or wrong?
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Anout TM808, maybe in patent are explained function of each stage. We have schematics of this, also PCB in SMD version posted here few years ago... Now, somebody built it and wich performance present in comparisson the original? Hummm! Here is the problem. I used the original detector and the only big problem I found with it is the bad performance in terrain extremely wet... This detector is very sensitive. I remember I found with it copper mineral, green mineral. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What do you mean by "Al loop and small coil inside it"? Maybe schematic is some unclear regarding coils, but Al loop are not inductive coupled to "small coil" but electric connected by wire in one only coil. "Small coil" are secondary winding inside ferite potcore and form togheter with Al loop one coil which resonate down harmonic to primary (tunable) LC tank. So loop and "small coil" byself resonate out of TR frequency and are by this only slightly coupled which cause by near target escape from balanced (tuned) nulling at given resonance and by this tone in RX (like by un-nulled device).
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Since my memory is not serving me well lately i just checked at :
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...ighlight=tm808 and yes, that's what i ment, although i formulated it wrong. Al loop is connected with primary winding and IT IS COUPLED with secondary winding. You are right and i am right also. Only i missed to say that loop is a part of primary coil... So...i will preformulate again question; what are calculations for relation between loop dimensions and primary coil? And all that in relation to secondary coil? How to calculate best relation? For example; i would want to make loop with much different dimensions, so i must correct primary and secondary coils also, right?
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
[quote=ivconic;106244]Since my memory is not serving me well lately i just checked at :
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...ighlight=tm808 Sorry, I am not discuss TM808, I discuss "Deep seeking metal locator" by Phil Wait and Roger Harrison you mentioned in post #25. I do not remember TM 808 schematic, I was never interested in it.
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, I am not discuss TM808, I discuss "Deep seeking metal locator" by Phil Wait and Roger Harrison you mentioned in post #25. I do not remember TM 808 schematic, I was never interested in it.
Never mind actually. Principles should be the same.
__________________
http://www.infowars.com |
|
|