YES DIGITAL CAMERAS CAN SEE UNDERGROUND EASY AND LIVE

[Basellafe]

Watch again another video https://youtu.be/yiUATWp2mcE before delete

[brs]

You see the topsoil atoms. No penetration. Just zoom in

[darkman]

it's penetration my friend .

[darkman]

.









https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7csA8M7Ht8



.


we need to think outside the Box bud ..















regard's






.

[WM6]

Originally Posted by darkman

.

we need to think outside the Box bud ..

No help bud, trying to think outside of box, you still remain in box:

[الوهم]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJmp-wgQPPo

[okantex]

Hi
İs this your video?
What are you viewing there
İs this known test target?
Looks like endoscopic view of a person
Can you please explain a little bit

[الوهم]

Originally Posted by okantex

Hi
İs this your video?
What are you viewing there
İs this known test target?
Looks like endoscopic view of a person
Can you please explain a little bit

It was an underground target and not a test

[Rubin]

Hi to all.
After a very long period of absence, I returned and saw the thread from the member invisible ... Really very interesting.
I have known this technique with a camera since 2014.
I have build it and it never worked.
It is the same construction presented by the member invisible with a very small variation.
There are two cases.
1. Incorrect information
2. Perhaps an external source for stimulating the target.
I have no problem trying again, as long as there is seriousness and of course the results will be published for whoever wants to build it.
best regards

[الوهم]

Originally Posted by Rubin

Hi to all.
After a very long period of absence, I returned and saw the thread from the member invisible ... Really very interesting.
I have known this technique with a camera since 2014.
I have build it and it never worked.
It is the same construction presented by the member invisible with a very small variation.
There are two cases.
1. Incorrect information
2. Perhaps an external source for stimulating the target.
I have no problem trying again, as long as there is seriousness and of course the results will be published for whoever wants to build it.
best regards

Advice, do not tire yourself, the topic is incomplete, and there are also big mistakes. I do not know why the author of the topic published these errors, deliberately published them, or did not manufacture the camera in the first place

[Rubin]

Originally Posted by الوهم

Advice, do not tire yourself, the topic is incomplete, and there are also big mistakes. I do not know why the author of the topic published these errors, deliberately published them, or did not manufacture the camera in the first place

You may be right.
Luckily, a camera was found in our team in 2014.
I saw with my own eyes workιng very well underground only few meters
Its design was the same as the presentation from member VIEW
Unfortunately I did not have more time to study.
important is this camera h as very small differences design.
I made it, but I had no success.
Note the camera model was a very cheap Chinese and the LEDs common 850-940 nm
So ... maybe the settings .... maybe a source that stimulate the target make the difference.
It is definitely something simple. Each member can express their opinion.
If it does not succeed we just wasted our time. It's just a hobby

[الوهم]

Originally Posted by Rubin

You may be right.
Luckily, a camera was found in our team in 2014.
I saw with my own eyes workιng very well underground only few meters
Its design was the same as the presentation from member VIEW
Unfortunately I did not have more time to study.
important is this camera h as very small differences design.
I made it, but I had no success.
Note the camera model was a very cheap Chinese and the LEDs common 850-940 nm
So ... maybe the settings .... maybe a source that stimulate the target make the difference.
It is definitely something simple. Each member can express their opinion.
If it does not succeed we just wasted our time. It's just a hobby

Yes, try, you may arrive. I know people who were lucky and were able to turn the camera on and wait to see the owner of the topic regarding the mistakes. I will not talk about mistakes because the camera project is not mine.

[Nicolas]

Originally Posted by الوهم

Advice, do not tire yourself, the topic is incomplete, and there are also big mistakes. I do not know why the author of the topic published these errors, deliberately published them, or did not manufacture the camera in the first place

Totally you are right son of Palestine. the member never built it and have do a big mistake only come here to find the lost ring. only make copy and paste from other peoples who try it. you and me and much other know also. but the secret remain secret about this project.

[الوهم]

Originally Posted by Nicolas

Totally you are right son of Palestine. the member never built it and have do a big mistake only come here to find the lost ring. only make copy and paste from other peoples who try it. you and me and much other know also. but the secret remain secret about this project.

Thank you, yes, you are right

[Rubin]

I can not understand.
Suppose a VIEW member posted the thread as COPY PASTE for more information.
Personally, I do not consider it wrong, because usually every post ... contains 50% of the truth and every person who can not clone, tries with knowledge from other members
In this case, he published what he knew and through opinions he tries to improve what he knows.
I started writing on this thread, because many years ago, I had seen with my own eyes a camera with real work (camera + led etc. same connection philosophy)
We know many members here who are professionals. Unfortunately, many are secret professionals and only in his "honor" Nicholas presents his true profile.
Is there a secret? Okay ... use the messages, but do not use personal attacks or public messages to confuse.
I have knowledge of creating a gold detector with an efficiency greater than 70%
Do you know how I acquired the knowledge? Only with messages from members, honestly. I'm a hobbyist, another is a professional, but we have all won
Do you know why we are not moving forward?
It is simple. Most people think cunningly.
One last.
If there is a secret, sooner or later it will be known. So it is foolish for some to try, just to save time.
If it's a myth, we have won again

[jafal]

Originally Posted by Rubin

Hi to all.
After a very long period of absence, I returned and saw the thread from the member invisible ... Really very interesting.
I have known this technique with a camera since 2014.
I have build it and it never worked.
It is the same construction presented by the member invisible with a very small variation.
There are two cases.
1. Incorrect information
2. Perhaps an external source for stimulating the target.
I have no problem trying again, as long as there is seriousness and of course the results will be published for whoever wants to build it.
best regards

its just a microscope mixed with a lot of illusions and dreams

the real camera cant see but metals just and only

[elhit29]

Originally Posted by jafal

its just a microscope mixed with a lot of illusions and dreams

the real camera cant see but metals just and only

NOT TRUE.. THE REAL CAMERA SEES EVERYTHING INCLUDING DRAWINGS OF TINY DETAILS ON CAVE's WALLS.

[Rubin]

I have no doubt about what you believe. Maybe it's an illusion
I had seen with my own eyes, a camera and it was really showing.
Maybe I saw what I wanted "mind games"
But maybe 50% or more is true.
Time will tell..

[jafal]

Originally Posted by elhit29

NOT TRUE.. THE REAL CAMERA SEES EVERYTHING INCLUDING DRAWINGS OF TINY DETAILS ON CAVE's WALLS.

yes the REAL CAMERA SEES EVERYTHING INCLUDING DRAWINGS OF TINY DETAILS ON CAVE's WALLS its true

but i am talking about the sony camera which made in jordan and can see more than 25 meters underground i saw movies taken with it it can not detect but metals with low
resolution image and turns to green black color

i saw a demonstration for it a car tire and an axe the tire shown just metal side and the axe
without wooden hand

[jafal]

this camera just wasting time no more it is a microscope with ir leds glowing in the dark

[jafal]

Originally Posted by Rubin

I have no doubt about what you believe. Maybe it's an illusion
I had seen with my own eyes, a camera and it was really showing.
Maybe I saw what I wanted "mind games"
But maybe 50% or more is true.
Time will tell..

sir
there is true cameras but not this

[elhit29]

Originally Posted by jafal

yes the REAL CAMERA SEES EVERYTHING INCLUDING DRAWINGS OF TINY DETAILS ON CAVE's WALLS its true

but i am talking about the sony camera which made in jordan and can see more than 25 meters underground i saw movies taken with it it can not detect but metals with low
resolution image and turns to green black color

i saw a demonstration for it a car tire and an axe the tire shown just metal side and the axe
without wooden hand

Yes, here you are right.. The modified SONY Camera you specified can ONLY see objects' images of low resolution.
As I made my remarks to you earlier, I thought you were talking about the Camera subject of this thread, where the camera pulsed wave value exceeds 2450 MHz which is nearly close to gamma ray. I misunderstood you.

[Rubin]

Originally Posted by elhit29

Yes, here you are right.. The modified SONY Camera you specified can ONLY see objects' images of low resolution.
As I made my remarks to you earlier, I thought you were talking about the Camera subject of this thread, where the camera pulsed wave value exceeds 2450 MHz which is nearly close to gamma ray. I misunderstood you.

Suppose there is external stimulation.
You mean on your post 2450GHZ?
I ask you, why 2450 MHZ as you write is 2.45 GHZ.
I don't think it can have anything to do with infrared, this low frequency.
Sometimes any translate make a confused.

[jafal]

Originally Posted by Rubin

Suppose there is external stimulation.
You mean on your post 2450GHZ?
I ask you, why 2450 MHZ as you write is 2.45 GHZ.
I don't think it can have anything to do with infrared, this low frequency.
Sometimes any translate make a confused.

the infrared
will not penetrate the earth not into any way

the external stimulation is a radio wave not light wave there

[jafal]

Originally Posted by elhit29

Yes, here you are right.. The modified SONY Camera you specified can ONLY see objects' images of low resolution.
As I made my remarks to you earlier, I thought you were talking about the Camera subject of this thread, where the camera pulsed wave value exceeds 2450 MHz which is nearly close to gamma ray. I misunderstood you.

gamma rays far a way than 2.4 ghz

Gamma rays are the highest energy EM radiation and typically have energies greater than 100 keV, frequencies greater than 1019^19 Hz, and wavelengths less than 10 picometers

the Camera subject of this thread using infrared leds wont be able to pass any soil