#2651
|
||||
|
||||
|
#2652
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#2653
|
||||
|
||||
|
#2654
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#2655
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
fm transmitter + era-3sm+opamp lm 358 these are the ones I see. as picture. |
#2656
|
|||
|
|||
What is your maximum depth
|
#2657
|
||||
|
||||
Is it possible to send PCB of this?
|
#2658
|
||||
|
||||
hello, have you tried the franco telescopic antenna with a copper or other metal antenna?
|
#2659
|
||||
|
||||
Franco TR1 Emitter The 8 MHz oscilloscope screen is to be what value.
|
#2660
|
|||
|
|||
The value is not critical, it is in the 1/3 V peak to peak range. Varying C2 / C3 / C4 you get the right voltage value at the sensor stage output. You could also put a semi-fixed potentiometer in place of R3 for easier adjustment.
|
#2661
|
||||
|
||||
Tr1 Emitter Image Pictured.
https://imgyukle.com/i/0bS4U I added a 30/40pf capacitor to the Tr4 collector. This is how I solved it. |
#2662
|
|||
|
|||
I do not understand what happened, I put the post back
The value is not critical, it is in the 1/3 V peak to peak range. Varying C2 / C3 / C4 you get the right voltage value at the sensor stage output. You could also put a semi-fixed potentiometer in place of R3 for easier adjustment. |
#2663
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
do you look at the picture https://imgyukle.com/i/0441q |
#2664
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I don't understand what the 30 / 40pf capacitor to the Tr4 collector is for. |
#2665
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Add See. Notice that the droops are from here. |
#2666
|
||||
|
||||
"Phenomenon"
Hello Franco,
i read your theme and i notice that you have alot of patience in your answers,bravo! As about "phenomenon"(Greek word)i think that gold,silver and copper(but mainly gold and silver)when they are placed(burried)for years in the ground(due to their electrochemical reaction with the soil)become something like antennas with the result that when a radio signal hits them it increases(the signal)and we can catch this increase with any LRL...your's or Mineoro e.t.c. My regards: Christos |
#2667
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I think your theory is correct but incomplete, as the magnetic field also comes into play in the phenomenon due to the different orientation sensitivity. |
#2668
|
||||
|
||||
Is the phenomenon always positive? Or is it negative?
I have detected 2 locations with your sensor. Both are positive, but the iron phenomenon is also effective. Do you have any ideas for this? |
#2669
|
|||
|
|||
In my experience the phenomenon is always positive and my various lrls are insensitive to iron, a fact confirmed by other members of the forum, however other members (Geo for example) affirm that instead the lrl is also sensitive to iron. Probably some types of ground can be the cause of this.
|
#2670
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What do I need to do to prevent the iron, can you share some information about it? |
#2671
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes,because earth's magnetic lines moves from south to north. |
#2672
|
|||
|
|||
If the device is strongly sensitive to iron and the Earth's magnetic field, it is not suitable for detecting gold
More modification is required |
#2673
|
|||
|
|||
All the lrls are directional, the maximum sensitivity is from north to south, as I said as far as I am concerned, my lrl, tested in Switzerland and in Italy, is insensitive to iron. However in any case it is necessary to use an MD for the final phase, that is, to establish the exact point.
|
#2674
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#2675
|
|||
|
|||
In my experience my lrl (but I think the others too) is insensitive to iron, without having to make any changes. If it happens in some type of ground, I don't know what modification to make. I want to add that in the places where I did tests there was a lot of iron, even partially buried stakes and there was no reaction to the iron.
|
|
|