LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #226  
Old 06-03-2020, 10:10 AM
humhum's Avatar
humhum humhum is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farid View Post
Hello Mr. Morgan
I tested your pdk 2 and 3 devices.
Unfortunately, it is only sometimes responsible in urban environments and not at all in areas outside the city.
But Alonso's pd gave me a good answer, both in the city and outside the city.

Can use 50Hz Filter for City .
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 06-04-2020, 01:57 AM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default PDK-2 with upgrade LRL IR/UV

Quote:
Originally Posted by humhum View Post
Can use 50Hz Filter for City .
PDK-2 with upgrade LRL IR/UV it will work fine every where,

if someone interested I can send the Kit to instal, its easy
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 06-04-2020, 02:04 AM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default PDK-2 with upgrade LRL IR/UV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farid View Post
Hello Mr. Morgan
I tested your pdk 2 and 3 devices.
Unfortunately, it is only sometimes responsible in urban environments and not at all in areas outside the city.
But Alonso's pd gave me a good answer, both in the city and outside the city.
I can send a KIT for you to instal in PDK-2,very easy,no need electronics experience, it upgrade very well for gold targets in remote areas where Phenomenon is more dificult,see the video and read how system work


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbPVxbl7lkM
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 06-04-2020, 02:07 PM
GOLDEN LILLY's Avatar
GOLDEN LILLY GOLDEN LILLY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 147
Default

Yes Morgan, please send me the plan for pdk upgrade to IR/UV. I want to try it...
My email: errel74@yahoo.com..thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 06-04-2020, 04:07 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default

I send the KIT only to person who have the ORIGINAL PDK , not the fake copy of NICOLAS PDK project.
To instal the KIT I need a photo of the inner box to explain how to do process of modification.
Reply With Quote
  #231  
Old 06-04-2020, 04:09 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default

do you have one PDK-2 original ?
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old 06-06-2020, 12:25 AM
GOLDEN LILLY's Avatar
GOLDEN LILLY GOLDEN LILLY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 147
Default

I do not have your PDK 2, but I have my own build PDK...
I thought the upgrade is for every member of this forum...my mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old 06-06-2020, 01:03 AM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default PDK-2 CLONE

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOLDEN LILLY View Post
I do not have your PDK 2, but I have my own build PDK...
I thought the upgrade is for every member of this forum...my mistake.
as you like, I dont know behavior circuit have on this PDK CLONE, if you interested to try, I sent you but need to see where to put circuit, here photos of the KIT inside PDK-2,to have one ideia how it is
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old 06-06-2020, 07:05 AM
putrechigi's Avatar
putrechigi putrechigi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 233
Default hi morgan

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgan View Post
do you have one PDK-2 original ?

hi morgan nice too meet you
yes I have one pdk 2 from your construction I wrote you in pvt
reguards
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old 06-07-2020, 05:01 AM
zakari's Avatar
zakari zakari is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgan View Post
as you like, I dont know behavior circuit have on this PDK CLONE, if you interested to try, I sent you but need to see where to put circuit, here photos of the KIT inside PDK-2,to have one ideia how it is
hi morgan

i think one of the ic is 555

and other is 358 or tl082


best regard
zakari
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old 06-14-2020, 01:09 AM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default

you can buy a flames detector from ebay and make a field test with your LRL,

maybe you find something if you looking for fire flames...
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old 06-14-2020, 09:07 AM
abdou2014 abdou2014 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,042
Default

which part increases the distance of detection , the sensitivity of the receiver or the power of the transmitter ?

I noticed that the UV LEDs are very fragile, if I add a BD transistor for more power the led burns .

is it preferable (if the UV emitter is a distance factor) to add other UV leds ?

Thank you Mr Morgan for your helps !
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old 06-14-2020, 10:35 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default

the distance to the UV LED and the IR LED is important
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old 06-21-2020, 02:17 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default PASSIVE RECEIVER

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgan View Post
the distance to the UV LED and the IR LED is important
I get a coil formula for the Alonso PD passive receiver that can detect a 1,5V battery spark 2,20m distance, my question, someone here get this distance or more with the passive receiver ?
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old 06-21-2020, 02:29 PM
Pahom Pahom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Россия
Posts: 247
Default

Yes there is such a result when the receiver is clearly powered 9 volts if the power is 8.5 volts then the range falls to 1-1. 5 meters.
Reply With Quote
  #241  
Old 06-21-2020, 02:59 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default

thats right,

and more than 9V , or 9,50V that reduce distance ,

I m talking about distance I get with 2x 9V for each battery(rechargeable) using the passive receiver whitout oscillator for stimulate the RX coil, sure I get more distance using circuit stimullator,or maybe it become unstable,

thanks
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 06-21-2020, 03:06 PM
Pahom Pahom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Россия
Posts: 247
Default

I got this result without a stimulant . But with a stable power supply of 9 volts.
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 06-21-2020, 04:16 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default

and field test results ?
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 06-21-2020, 04:20 PM
Pahom Pahom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Россия
Posts: 247
Default

With that receiver, it didn't go to field testing. And there was no polygon, as there is now.
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 06-21-2020, 11:28 PM
WM6's Avatar
WM6 WM6 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Borovnica, Slovenia
Posts: 2,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abdou2014 View Post

which part increases the distance of detection ,
the sensitivity of the receiver or the power of the transmitter ?


!
Neither of it, if there is no resonance in communication between both.
So magic word is "tuned in resonance".

Without this, we are back to spark transmitter (now forbidden by international law) and
broadband smoggy spark communication.

Hedy Lamarr is beginning with small spark too:

https://www.marketplace.org/2017/11/...ollywood-star/


__________________
Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 06-25-2020, 09:48 AM
Dubulumach Dubulumach is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgan View Post
I get a coil formula for the Alonso PD passive receiver that can detect a 1,5V battery spark 2,20m distance, my question, someone here get this distance or more with the passive receiver ?
Hy Morgan

Play with gap at ferrite. Sensitivity also depend of ferrite type.

Also you need new stimulator oscillator. Original designed has a drift and need many times retune while detecting.

Could you explain more for your UV/IR detection?

ps: PDK 2 is better schematic than PDK 3. You could tune it very well up to some limit, which was ruled by capacitivity of your hand with respect to the ground. If you make electronic tuning it would be one of Top LRLs ever made. For more details contact me at email.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 06-25-2020, 10:53 AM
humhum's Avatar
humhum humhum is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 678
Default New type Stimulator

'' Also you need new stimulator oscillator.''

What type is New Stimulator , Vertical position or ??
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 06-25-2020, 02:05 PM
Dubulumach Dubulumach is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by humhum View Post
'' Also you need new stimulator oscillator.''

What type is New Stimulator , Vertical position or ??
Pure analogue sine SIN(x) sequencing oscillator f= 0-200 kHz with lowest THD possible. Very stable, withouth drift and with fine amplitude and phase control from 0....+-Vpp. At the output there should be broadband LF amplifier up to pair of watts. Bandwidth from 0 up to 1Mhz. These freqs. must go in/out without distortion. Prefer A-class.

Helpfulto have frq.meter. Not DSS generator because it has many harmonics in signal. Need 11-th pole filter for aliasing signal to get in close proximity of perfect sinus. Very hard to tune, need 0.1% component tolerance. Forget about DSS.

Position experimentaly.
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 06-25-2020, 02:10 PM
Dubulumach Dubulumach is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 283
Default

Magic part of PD Alonso is ferrite. Neither two or more same ferrites exist. What catch the "Halo-Effect" is only ferrite, his subatomic structure. Find radioactive one like Geo, and you would have many hundreds of meter distance, maybe km's.
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 06-25-2020, 04:18 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default PDK-2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubulumach View Post
Hy Morgan

Play with gap at ferrite. Sensitivity also depend of ferrite type.

Also you need new stimulator oscillator. Original designed has a drift and need many times retune while detecting.

Could you explain more for your UV/IR detection?

ps: PDK 2 is better schematic than PDK 3. You could tune it very well up to some limit, which was ruled by capacitivity of your hand with respect to the ground. If you make electronic tuning it would be one of Top LRLs ever made. For more details contact me at email.

Regards
I get this distance on a spark not using stimulator coil.

about the IR/UV its not my invention, I made some modification, the inventor belong to this forum and not want (for the moment) the project to be clone.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.