LRLs and no reliable detection value data

[Funfinder]

Mainly I'm talking now about findsize in relation to detection distance:

Lets assume such anomaly-detector is sensitive and adjusted good enough so
it detects spots where a metal object was able to produce a significant anomaly:

But is it possible at all to find single or certain finds?


Provide some clear data if you can!


If an object that has the size of a coin would be detectable from 15 meters
it means that every object within this radius which is smaller becames undetectable!

The much more dramatic it is with real large finds, if such a thing would be detectable
from 100 meters you can forget about all the other finds in this area because the
large one makes them invinsible as long as it was not removed!

Not to think about finds that are detectable form 1000 meters!


Practically seen such a LRL detector is totally useless because at most good treasure
locations there is a find every single meter !!!

It may detect a buried "city of gold" deep inside of the jungle where gold is concentrated
and 1km around that city is no metal at all but only the fewest persons have the
chance to make jungle-expeditions to so far completly unknown territory.

This means that all over whole Europe, Asia, America and Africa those detectors are
totally useless if they have no real good pinpoint-function!


Besides there exists no other important technical details data:

- detection principle on what the LRL is scientifical proved based on
(this means the LRL is really reliable working and repeatable tests are successful)
- exact find size together with extact detection distance for those finds
- how good works metal-discrimination at all
- what causes the detector to fail (clouds, sun, wind, rain, storm or whatever)


How pro LRLs can believe that anybody will buy this stuff if they can provide
not even trustworthy and for the detection and real treasure-hunting needed
technical data?!

We are not talking about a dowsing-rod which may detect completly everything
or nothing at all, depending what person holds it!
And such hasel-rod doesn't costs 1000s of dollars, it costs nothing at all if
you create this hogus-bogus and superstitious dowsing-thingy by yourself!



So if all you LRL-types already are completly unable to provide a clear answer
on what technical principle your "fantastic" long range field detectors works,
don't think you also can make the same idiotical secret out of the
"find-size to detection-distance"-values!
Because if you are unable to give persons an impression at what distance
those can or better "may" detect this or that find, they will have no interest at all.
And isn't it the main business of the pro LRLs to speak about fantastic wide
and huge detection-distances ??? The more, the better they think!

But they are stupid enough to think twice because if you can detect a coin at 100meters
it is obvious that nobody is able to detect anything else too within this huge radius,
until this coin was found - which is extremly much work at such a huge area.

And even if the coin is detectable on a radius about 12meters this gives already
around 100 square-meters and it will take very long to find the coin there,
especially if its deeper buried!


I think we can stop it here - our LRL-developers have now alot to do to explain
at what distance what size is possible to find and how this should be done at all !!!


To everyone who is interested in LRL one crucial tip:
Better visit a region for treasure hunting which is FAR FAR away from any civilisation
or your fantastic long range thingy can not be saved because of far too much finds !!!

Every usual hunting-site must be the absolute overkill for any LRL!


And a good tip to the pro-LRLs:
Sell your LRL to people from Canada, Syberia and Australia and where are huge deserts,
jungles, untouched woods or ice-plains!

For those who are way too stupid to understand what I wanna tell here:

For most regions a LRL would be the same as for an usual metal detector a site
where every 2-3 cm nails and alu-shards are scattered around!

So have fun at places where no civilsation is within a radius of 100 km you pro-LRLs!!!
Perhaps this is the best place where you should go, anyway!
Do yourself a favour, detect gold at the arctic-circle and please: stay there forever!

[reza vir]

These devices Hae-field vortex waves are detected
The magnetic field may be created by an earthen jars or metal
In any case, can not be trusted to act properly
You see a wave of 1 km're after digging the roots of the tree

If you have any mineral land that is no reason on earth to do and fill
Then check to see that the machine is turned off because Jae Hae-field waves and magnetic vortex is more pores and loosen dirt and pulled towards it.

[WM6]

Originally Posted by Funfinder

Do yourself a favour, detect gold at the arctic-circle and please: stay there forever!

Without any heating? Don't be so crude dear friend.

Some nuclear power plant should be allowed to take with him.

[Funfinder]

Good idea, WM6, we can send them with an atomic unterwater-boat to those locations.

Of course if it contains noble metal it would be detectable with their LRLs from 1000s of km...



btw. I guess we have already their approx. distance values -
because this forum since a long time is full of them!

And all those values are far too high for being real practicable:

small stuff 10 meters and for larger 100 meters or even 500m to 1km.

Didn't found that Mineoro guy this little golden jewelery-thingy from 20meters?
Of course we know already this was some nice little "magican-show" but if it would
have been the pure and fantastic truth it would be even more devestating!


In other words:

Those LRLs have no selectivity!


They even can't reduce their sensitivity so it would be possible to pinpoint their
"perhaps and maybe selffound" things without a metal-detector as a pinpointer.

At least some cross-pinpointing from a larger distance must be working on a very small angle.
This means if the coin is 15meter away and someone wants to crosspinpoints it,
this has to work like shooting a bullet with a gun - the LRL must show through a
littel telescope into the absolutly exact direction where the coin is below somewhere.

Otherwise you can search forever for it, if the "detected area" is like a huge elipitical
cloud with a size of 10 x 30 meters for usual objects.


The more hard facts and good arguments we collect here together,
the more their "LRL-theories" and shiny treasure-detection-stories
fall into little worthless pieces like a x-mas-bauble fell off the tree!