$5,000 Coat Hangers vs Metal Dector Challenge

[Max]

Originally Posted by Jim

Nowhere in the challenge does it mention “metal detector” (or Dector).

Dollars to doughnuts the blogger was referring to Long Range Locators when he drafted the challenge. The verbiage is specific to “electronic detectors”…sometimes referred to as LRLs

The appropriate title to this thread would be: Coat Hangers vs. Long Range Locators

Yes, of course,
but Dell wrote the title as " $5,000 Coat Hangers vs Metal Dector Challenge"

where you can read that the challenge is between coat hangers vs metal-detector... or not ?

Then he also made post like "I will challenge any gold hunter using an electronic detector" etc

Not explaining he was reporting words from other people... so we can conclude he's doing the challenge himself not the third party...canadian one.

Now... if not so... he just demonstrated another time he and his paint rollers can't pass any challenge against a real metal detector and skilled operator.

Just like serious THunters already know.

Kind regards,
Max

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by Jim

Nowhere in the challenge does it mention “metal detector” (or Dector).

Dollars to doughnuts the blogger was referring to Long Range Locators when he drafted the challenge. The verbiage is specific to “electronic detectors”…sometimes referred to as LRLs

The appropriate title to this thread would be: Coat Hangers vs. Long Range Locators

That's exactly right.
The challenge made by the Canadian is titled "Gold Detector Verses Dowsing Rod"
And the challenge is "I will challenge any gold hunter using an electronic detector, against my two coat hangers".
It was Dell who added the words "Metal Detector" in his title to this thread. It appears that Dell is responsible for making it look like this is a contest between metal detectors and dowsing rods.

So what is the challenge?
The Canadian says he will challenge any gold hunter using an electronic detector against his two coat hangers. Doesn't this include gold hunters who use metal detectors? Isn't a metal detector an electronic detector?
According to his challenge, you must be a gold hunter and you must use an electronic detector, while he uses two coat hangers.

A minor complication is in the title to his challenge "Gold detector Verses Dowsing Rods". Gold detector implies a detector that only finds gold, but could also be any detector that finds gold and other things too. However, the title is not the challenge. He clearly stated his challenge which specifies the challenger must be a gold hunter and must use an electronic detector. The title only gives hints to what he had in mind. It does not specify the rules to the challenge. I suppose if you used a home-made metal detector, then you could paste a label on it that says "Gold Detector" and this would satisfy any implied requirement that it must be a gold detector.

So there you have it... You don't have to travel so far, Clondike Clad. The $5000 challenge is in Canada.

But before you pack for Canada to win your $5000, consider the credibility of the challenge.
Suppose you get there, and the Canadian says "I was only kidding"?
Or he says the challenge is only open to electronic gold-finding LRLs?
Or suppose he says: "what did you expect? I am supposed to make good on some silly thing you read in my blog?
Your laws must be different than the laws here. Go home Yankee".

If that happened, you could have a nice vacation and go home less travel expenses.

I still think Dell is laughing in front of his computer at all the ruckus he caused by making it appear that this was his challenge against metal detectors.
Do you think he would laugh harder if you went to the challenge in Canada and got turned back?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Clondike Clad]

Originally Posted by Dell Winders

Gold Detector Verses Dowsing Rod

I will challenge any gold hunter using an electronic detector, against my two coat hangers. How confident am I? $5,000. The challenge: a third party will hide a small gold nugget somewhere on a football field, placing it two inches deep by pounding a wooden rod into the ground. The first to uncover the gold nugget is the winner. The event will be video tapped. Email me if you are up to the challeng

http://www.dowselikeapro.com/My_Blog.html

The question is why did dell post this.
He wanted us to think HE wants to do this.
ALL I DID WAS CALL HIM OUT ON THIS.
BUT NO DELL
OK so do you want to do this DELL or what?

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by Clondike Clad

The question is why did dell post this.
He wanted us to think HE wants to do this.
ALL I DID WAS CALL HIM OUT ON THIS.
BUT NO DELL
OK so do you want to do this DELL or what?

Maybe he's too busy burning DVDs ready for posting!

[Theseus]

Dell has always been one to use forum postings to advertise his wares. Not just this forum, but any forum that picks up a little traffic on the subject of dowsing.

I propose his motive for starting this thread, and with the wording he did, was nothing more than another of his schemes to get some free advertising by having every one here mention his name in a series of postings.

I'd say his scheme worked rather well.

He may have only a 6th grade education (or less) but he is certainly no fool. While his direct competition, in the LRL/MFD scam dowsing device market, spend thousands of dollars on websites and website designers; to attract more sales - Dell has always garnered his share of the market by haunting dowsing and LRL/MFD forums.

With the exception of Mike(Mont) and Tim Williams (a couple of wanna be's), you really don't see any other manfacturer/dealers pushing their wares on the aforementioned forums. Clearly, different strategies for different marketeers.

[Dell Winders]

On the other forums I posted, I seen how it might be construed, so I went back and modified to read I saw this on the internet. Unfortunately, on this forum it was too late to modify.

I did mistakenly credit folks here with the intelligence to click on the link to get the details before they leaped to conclusions. That was the error in my thinking.

Honestly, I did get a big laugh at the pretenders who claim to adhere to fact, jumping all over each other with their assumptions. It didn't add any credibility to your interest in research, truth, or fact, but I did enjoy watching your antics. Thanks for that!

And so it is, and always will be with the Skeptic clan, and Carl's forum. dell

[Max]

Originally Posted by Dell Winders

On the other forums I posted, I seen how it might be construed, so I went back and modified to read I saw this on the internet. Unfortunately, on this forum it was too late to modify.

I did mistakenly credit folks here with the intelligence to click on the link to get the details before they leaped to conclusions. That was the error in my thinking.

Honestly, I did get a big laugh at the pretenders who claim to adhere to fact, jumping all over each other with their assumptions. It didn't add any credibility to your interest in research, truth, or fact, but I did enjoy watching your antics. Thanks for that!

And so it is, and always will be with the Skeptic clan, and Carl's forum. dell

You can laugh as you want...

but people here know that your paint rollers don't work for c.r.a.p.

Then... you can also post what you want... and people could made wrong conclusions... why not ?

But this, again, is a proof you're full of c.r.a.p from your hairs tips to your shoes...

just to be polite...

Kind regards,
Max