#326
|
||||
|
||||
At active mode (with passive receiver off) it works as a simple metal detector, so catches the coin from 10...15cm (air test)
__________________
Geo |
#327
|
|||
|
|||
3 meters on air or recently buried or long time buried ?
|
#328
|
||||
|
||||
3m for buried coin if it has create phenomenon.
__________________
Geo |
#329
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks
|
#330
|
||||
|
||||
Tank you so much geo
In active _ passive mode (both on )how far can catch spark 1.5v ? Best regards
__________________
to be willing is to be able |
#331
|
||||
|
||||
If you have very good null at ferrite then 40...60 cm.
__________________
Geo |
#332
|
|||
|
|||
for a low frequency transmission by the transmitter of the alonzo clone, it is best to add the number of turns or keep the original configuration and increase the parallel C ???
|
#333
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
field . For example : Circuit with high sentivity can receive spark from 20m or 50m , but in real field can't catch from phenomenon energy , because here need real calibration for receive real wavelenght of phenmenon . When calibration of circuit is Real , so You can find Big buried object upto ... more meters or distance with clone Alonso PD , but about Spark only in cm or few meter . |
#334
|
|||
|
|||
if it detects a spark at 2 meters it says nothing about the phenomenon of buried metal, at least for my area. with many hours out and many tests I ended up with a 100nf capacitor in the receiver, and with an RF signal at 2.8khz and 3.3khz to detects huge objects from a distance of a few meters..the spark detection dropped to 60 cm..I think the RF signal is important to increase the distance x 3 times, but if the Receiver does not respond to the phenomenon very close to your area which is the most importantly you will not catch anything with the RF that just increases the distance ..
|
#335
|
|||
|
|||
I do not have access to the secret forum that has a lot of information from esteban etc, but with the tests and some personal expenses I came to the conclusion that it does not take much to detect the phenomenon of the noble metal from a few meters away ... I think you need a sensitive receiver in combination with the sound generator, a BFO absorption system, and a beacon RF circuit and with the right combination can detect the phenomenon ..
|
#336
|
|||
|
|||
Hello to all good friends and Mr. Alenso
Mr. Allenso, I want to use the mpsa18 transistor in this circuit. Is there no problem? Thank you |
#337
|
||||
|
||||
Mr Alonso is not member of this forum.
Mpsa18 has lower Bandwidth and highter β. I don't know if it's a good choise to replace BC.... with it.
__________________
Geo |
#338
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Geo |
#339
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
All the story is to make the passive receiver to work out of saturation
__________________
Geo |
#340
|
|||
|
|||
thanks Geo for the idea
|
#341
|
|||
|
|||
This is not an idea, this is a radio theme !!!
|
#342
|
|||
|
|||
radio theme ???????? explain my friend ???
|
#343
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#344
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#345
|
|||
|
|||
|
#346
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
..........
__________________
Geo |
#347
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Sir Geo,
Good evening sir. I sent an email to you. Please if you have time kindly reply. Thank you. Regards, Sally |
#348
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you... |
#349
|
||||
|
||||
Qiaozhi s diagram is correct
__________________
to be willing is to be able |
#350
|
||||
|
||||
Originally Posted by kostas87
I do not have access to the secret forum that has a lot of information from esteban etc, but with the tests and some personal expenses I came to the conclusion that it does not take much to detect the phenomenon of the noble metal from a few meters away ... I think you need a sensitive receiver in combination with the sound generator, a BFO absorption system, and a beacon RF circuit and with the right combination can detect the phenomenon .. Geo: The secret is a good design, a carefully construction, a fine tunning and of course a strong phenomenon. Without phenomenon it is difficult to do a lrl to work!!! Geo is correct. The signal is not a line. It is the electrons flowing from the earth to the ionosphere. The amount of current flowing from the ground to the ionosphere is minuscule at any point on the surface of the earth. However. when there is buried metal that has ions migrating in the ground where it is located, then we see a larger migration of electrons moving upwards toward the ionosphere. The amount of increased electron flow is minuscule, so it is hard to detect. This means we need a very sensitive detector to detect the difference. (what we are trying to do is use a detector that is so sensitive that it can detect the difference in a location that has double the amount of ions moving into the atmosphere as there are in the adjacent locations). This is a VERY sensitive detector...! A magnetic wave detector seems to be the best choice of detector, because it is immune from the electrical interference that plagues the skies. However, the increased flow of electrons from the metal site can be stopped if any high energy is injected into it. What I mean by this is... if you were to scan the location of the buried treasure with a metal detector, the strength of the VLF or PI signal would neutralize any ions in the ground and stop the flow of electrons into the atmosphere. This means the target site would be made neutral, or the same as the surrounding ground, so you could no longer detect it. The moral is: When you build your treasure detector, be careful to not make your simulator coil too strong...! Thats the truth. Take it or leave it. Best wishes, J_P |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|