LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:52 AM
ma330 ma330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 113
Question help LRL....???

HI TO ALL:
I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
WAIT FOR YOU DEARS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2009, 01:07 PM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well above sea level
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ma330 View Post
HI TO ALL:
I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
WAIT FOR YOU DEARS
http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat

The link above will take you to a schematic of the Electroscope 301.

However, I don't know exactly what you mean by "nice working". If you mean will it respond to your own ideomotor response, than yes it will do that. But you could save your time and expense of building such a device because the electronics in the 301 do not add anything to the response or the accuracy. You could get the very same results by just working with a bent piece of wire, or a bent piece of brazing rod.

Go to the link below, and you will find some very fine examples of bent wire L-rods that will perform exactly like an Electroscope 301.

http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat

Hope this helps....
__________________

The Wallet-Miner's Creed
Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2009, 01:14 PM
Max's Avatar
Max Max is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mars (cool)
Posts: 2,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ma330 View Post
HI TO ALL:
I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
WAIT FOR YOU DEARS


It's that "nice working" that makes me laugh...

Do you mean the time when LRL seller get money and customer all happy bring device home maybe ???

Kind regards,
Max
__________________

"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason
"

someone said...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2009, 02:25 PM
Qiaozhi's Avatar
Qiaozhi Qiaozhi is offline
Guru (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post


It's that "nice working" that makes me laugh...

Do you mean the time when LRL seller get money and customer all happy bring device home maybe ???

Kind regards,
Max
Very true!

Before you can provide an answer, you need to define what's meant by "nice working".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2009, 06:57 PM
ma330 ma330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Theseus View Post
http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat

The link above will take you to a schematic of the Electroscope 301.

However, I don't know exactly what you mean by "nice working". If you mean will it respond to your own ideomotor response, than yes it will do that. But you could save your time and expense of building such a device because the electronics in the 301 do not add anything to the response or the accuracy. You could get the very same results by just working with a bent piece of wire, or a bent piece of brazing rod.

Go to the link below, and you will find some very fine examples of bent wire L-rods that will perform exactly like an Electroscope 301.

http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat

Hope this helps....
tank you theseus dear
i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
tank you for help
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:08 PM
Fred's Avatar
Fred Fred is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: On a island
Posts: 2,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ma330 View Post
tank you theseus dear
i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
tank you for help
Yes, no IC or transistor, but price is very high! so it must work well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:38 PM
ma330 ma330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
Yes, no IC or transistor, but price is very high! so it must work well.
WHAT??????????????????
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:48 PM
putrechigi's Avatar
putrechigi putrechigi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 233
Default hi

http://www.buscadores-tesoros.com/te...ango-t1724.htm

i think this is what you search ,for everybodi too
reguards
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:13 PM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well above sea level
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ma330 View Post
tank you theseus dear
i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
tank you for help
The schematic is correct! At least that is what was in "some" of the 301s. Others, that looked just the same on the outside had all kinds of junk and do-nothing parts stuffed in them - to make it look like it was a very complicated device.

Please remember what I told you!!! Nothing inside the box mounted on top of the handle, had anything to do with the response from this LRL. The box and contents were strictly there for added weight - that is all. And of course to fool the gullible and technically-challenged into thinking they got their money's worth.

In truth, THEY GOT RIPPED OFF BIG TIME!

It is a known common fact the Electroscope 301 and all the other look-alike products worked exactly the same whether or not the Power Switch was On or Off.

Asking for a good "working" LRL schematic is akin to asking for the Moon to be delivered to your front door.

There just isn't any such thing. Besides, you can get the exact same results with just bent L-shaped wires so why go to all the trouble of wiring up a do-nothing circuit?
__________________

The Wallet-Miner's Creed
Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.