#126
|
||||
|
||||
So the newspaper is already mentally prepared to believe it will burst into flames?
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Or maybe... May the Swartz be with you.
|
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Testing LRL MFD w/ clairvoyant
This will not "prove" anything to the skeptics but is interesting annectodal "evidence".
Several years ago I did extensive testing of the MFD phenomena using a clairvoyant that could see the energies on a different dimension. I tested the clairvoyant on quite a number of other energy tests before running the MFD tests. We used special spiral antennas coated with gold and silver hooked to an audio signal generator. The Clairvoyant could see an energy line (actually a intensified energy) over and above the background energy field going from the transmitter to a gold sample and later a large silver sample. I then walked through the energy line and the clairvoyant saw the line disturbed and actually drop off. Timing measurements showed that it took the MFD about 45 seconds to reestablish the enegy line. We also verified that as the sun got higher in the sky (original tests were done before sun up but still daylight the sun's energies blotted out the energy line. We did extensive testing of various frequencies and found several that worked better than others. Goldfinder |
#129
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The main problem with your testing procedure is that both the clairvoyant and the testers knew where the target was hidden. Even if the clairvoyant was not aware, subtle unconscious clues by the testers can give away useful information. |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Don't waste your time posting such complex matters for the kids here in the kindergarten because they will keep throwing 'smashed paper balls' in your face. Regards.
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths" |
#131
|
||||
|
||||
The sand is full of heads buried in it. Why not another one?
__________________
The Wallet-Miner's Creed Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
|
#132
|
||||
|
||||
Some subjective testing took place under extremely non-rigorous conditions. You can hardly call this "research".
Quote:
Quote:
Goldfinder is not likely to become one of your puppets. He has already stated: This will not "prove" anything to the skeptics but is interesting annectodal "evidence". Note the word "anecdotal" -> Evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay is called anecdotal if there is doubt about its veracity: the evidence itself is considered untrustworthy or untrue. Hung's head has been buried in the sand for years, and unlikely to ever to see daylight again. |
#133
|
||||
|
||||
Or maybe was the Fart ?
__________________
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim... But we dont need a reason " someone said... |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#135
|
||||
|
||||
You cannot. But double-blind testing will reveal whether the results are real or false.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|