Viewing

Esteban · #1 02-08-2007, 06:38 PM

You the sick!

The witch of the forum:

Max · #2 02-08-2007, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esteban

You the sick!

The witch of the forum:

Hi Esteban,

??? to low activity ???

Don't understand.

Please explain.

Best regards,
Max

Esteban · #3 02-08-2007, 08:59 PM

No, the "perverse" Remote Sensing sub-forum has the most part of the time more visitors than others.

Qiaozhi · #4 02-08-2007, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esteban

No, the "perverse" Remote Sensing sub-forum has the most part of the time more visitors than others.

Perhaps it would fairer to split the Remote Sensing forum into sub-forums as well. In your snapshot it's actually 11 to 6 in favour of conventional technology.

Here's a suggestion of proposed sub-forums:

1. Ion Chambers and Other Nonsense
2. Homebuilt LRLs / Experiments
3. Do Nothing Schematics
4. Dell's Cry Baby Forum (alias the Winders Windup)

Qiaozhi · #5 02-08-2007, 11:52 PM

It also depends when you take your snapshot.
Here's it's an 11 to 1 ratio.

Jim · #6 02-09-2007, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

Perhaps it would fairer to split the Remote Sensing forum into sub-forums as well. In your snapshot it's actually 11 to 6 in favour of conventional technology.

Here's a suggestion of proposed sub-forums:

1. Ion Chambers and Other Nonsense
2. Homebuilt LRLs / Experiments
3. Do Nothing Schematics
4. Dell's Cry Baby Forum (alias the Winders Windup)

I like that idea (not to sure Carl will)...great suggestion!! Two donuts for you, Qiaozhi

Max · #7 02-09-2007, 09:10 AM

Hi,
seems that more interest is on Remote Sensing...well because there are many strange things happens there or supposed to(like in splatter movies).
People are actracted by bad-movies so why not by lrl-ing ?
I think lot of people are interested in remote sensing because discussion is sometimes funny, also.
Anyway, don't think we need a proliferation of sub-forums on the topic!

It's already enough for me.

Best regards,
Max