Does anybody understand this statement? Because it has me flummoxed.
Mr. Blanes has the gift of incomprehensible writing, which is quite useful when you are trying to avoid providing real answers. It's as if the only reason that inexperience can be justified as a tool for lack of compatibility with a product that was hailed a qualifier in performance with the demise of suitable results, and then some.
02-08-2009, 02:26 PM
Threaded Mode