Mineoro 2-Box -- 492 feet range?

[J_Player]

Here is what hung posted, directed to all the readers of the remote sensing forum, except not me. What I am posting below is directed to the same readers. hung can ignore it if he wishes, or can answer if he wishes.

Originally Posted by hung

All the spanking on my examiner evidences were not enough?
...Then, I reconsidered that in attention of the other general readers who are normal and don't deserve your misinformatios and deviations.

So, take note: The answers are directed towards those readers...

1- ...This individual not owning an Examiner clearly (and insanely) tries to 'insinuate' there's no diode soldered to the pot... ...I was challenged to post a picture. I won't do this of course. I respect the proprietary circuit secret of the manufacturer, unlike this individual who enjoys hacking detectors in desperation of his own incompetence.

2 - I said the scientific comunity uses AIAS as basis for their research.
This is asolutely true, although I misexpressed myself a little. I wanted to state the scientific comunity watches regularly the developments in AIAS and matches its own. ...

3 - The third question relates to his total ignorance in RF fundamentals. It was all twisted as a clear ignorance of what transmission lines is. 'Shoot' a siginal line? Oh my God.. May I recomend to this individual chapter 1 of the ARRL book for a basic understanding of RF transmission process?

What I said is that the Examiner sends out a signal and aligns with the responsive one. This creates a signal line, in the same manner a frequency broadcast is received by any ordinary receiver tuned to that frequency. ...

Now wait a minute... hung has just posted some more false information!

Look at #1 - Here is hung's original statement of how he measured inside his Ranger Tell:
From page: http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/s...618&#post63618

Originally Posted by hung

"The way I was measuring the variances, was opening the examiner box and placing the positive probe in the lead of the diode which is connected to the pot".

And now hung says I clearly (and insanely) try to insinuate theres no diode soldered to the pot. Am I insane? I did not insinuate there is no diode soldered to a pot. I stated a fact, no insinuation:
From page: http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/s...3725#post63725

Originally Posted by J_Player

I do not see any photos of his measurements that he claims he made inside the circuit board area, at "the diode which is connected to the pot". In fact there is no place the diode is connected to a pot inside the Ranger Tell, as Carl's internal photos show. The diode is connected between an enameled coil and a variable capacitor. (Did hung really open up a Ranger Tell)?

Hung says he won't show a picture of the diode connected to a pot. He lists the reason that he respects the proprietary circuit secret of the manufacturer, while his previous reason was about the calculator falling and making it hard to take photos! Hahahahaaa... There is no secret! We all have seen the photos of the inside of the Ranger Tell diode model as well as the schematic for it. We all know there is no pot soldered to the diode. Is the real reason why hung won't show photos because he knows he will show a photo that proves he never measured from a place where the diode connects to a pot? Is it possible hung refuses to show a photo because he knows he would have to show a photo that proves he sent out false information? Would hung's photo inside the Ranger Tell prove he never opened the Ranger Tell?

Look at #2 where hung says: "I said the scientific comunity uses AIAS as basis for their research."
Nice try at fooling us hung, But that's not what you said. What you said is still here for all to see from this page: http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/s...3185#post63185

Originally Posted by hung

If you navigate the internet correctly, you will find out how ALL scientific comunity in the world utilizes AIAS as basis for their research.

But now hung tries to erase his false information by saying "I misexpressed myself a little"? Now his new changed statement is only the last half of his original statement that has been edited? "the scientific comunity watches regularly the developments in AIAS and matches its own". I can agree that some of the scientific community probably does watch AIAS regularly, but not ALL. From asking the people I know in the scientific community, I concluded less than 10% of them ever heard of AIAS. But they seem to know Myron Evans. The scientists I know laughed when they heard Myron Evans in charge.

Look at #3 where hung tries to say I'm ignorant of RF fundamentals.
Hung claims he said "What I said is that the Examiner sends out a signal and aligns with the responsive one". But this as a lie! Here is what hung said in his original post at this page: http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/s...1226#post41226 "This is the principle in which the Rangertell Examiner works. Resonance to the elements subatomic levels when a carrier signal line is shot and returned". Hung goes on to say I am ignorant of RF fundamentals when I quote his words? Does anyone in this forum except hung believe Radio transmitters "shoot signal lines"? Now hung is trying to assign his ignorance to me because I quoted him?

Hung then goes on to explain that the Examiner sends out a signal... but wait, the Ranger Tell has no broadcasting equipment in it! In fact the Examiner has no working circuits in it. Look at the circuit diagram and the photos below and see if you can find a transmitter or receiver, or any circuit that is capable of doing anything. (also look for where the diode is connected to a pot).
Does it look like hung has been feeding us more false information?