LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > All-Electronic LRLs

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 05-21-2014, 10:22 PM
Funfinder's Avatar
Funfinder Funfinder is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 482
Exclamation LRLs and no reliable detection value data

Mainly I'm talking now about findsize in relation to detection distance:

Lets assume such anomaly-detector is sensitive and adjusted good enough so
it detects spots where a metal object was able to produce a significant anomaly:

But is it possible at all to find single or certain finds?


Provide some clear data if you can!


If an object that has the size of a coin would be detectable from 15 meters
it means that every object within this radius which is smaller becames undetectable!

The much more dramatic it is with real large finds, if such a thing would be detectable
from 100 meters you can forget about all the other finds in this area because the
large one makes them invinsible as long as it was not removed!

Not to think about finds that are detectable form 1000 meters!


Practically seen such a LRL detector is totally useless because at most good treasure
locations there is a find every single meter !!!

It may detect a buried "city of gold" deep inside of the jungle where gold is concentrated
and 1km around that city is no metal at all but only the fewest persons have the
chance to make jungle-expeditions to so far completly unknown territory.

This means that all over whole Europe, Asia, America and Africa those detectors are
totally useless if they have no real good pinpoint-function!


Besides there exists no other important technical details data:

- detection principle on what the LRL is scientifical proved based on
(this means the LRL is really reliable working and repeatable tests are successful)
- exact find size together with extact detection distance for those finds
- how good works metal-discrimination at all
- what causes the detector to fail (clouds, sun, wind, rain, storm or whatever)


How pro LRLs can believe that anybody will buy this stuff if they can provide
not even trustworthy and for the detection and real treasure-hunting needed
technical data?!

We are not talking about a dowsing-rod which may detect completly everything
or nothing at all, depending what person holds it!
And such hasel-rod doesn't costs 1000s of dollars, it costs nothing at all if
you create this hogus-bogus and superstitious dowsing-thingy by yourself!



So if all you LRL-types already are completly unable to provide a clear answer
on what technical principle your "fantastic" long range field detectors works,
don't think you also can make the same idiotical secret out of the
"find-size to detection-distance"-values!
Because if you are unable to give persons an impression at what distance
those can or better "may" detect this or that find, they will have no interest at all.
And isn't it the main business of the pro LRLs to speak about fantastic wide
and huge detection-distances ??? The more, the better they think!

But they are stupid enough to think twice because if you can detect a coin at 100meters
it is obvious that nobody is able to detect anything else too within this huge radius,
until this coin was found - which is extremly much work at such a huge area.

And even if the coin is detectable on a radius about 12meters this gives already
around 100 square-meters and it will take very long to find the coin there,
especially if its deeper buried!


I think we can stop it here - our LRL-developers have now alot to do to explain
at what distance what size is possible to find and how this should be done at all !!!


To everyone who is interested in LRL one crucial tip:
Better visit a region for treasure hunting which is FAR FAR away from any civilisation
or your fantastic long range thingy can not be saved because of far too much finds !!!

Every usual hunting-site must be the absolute overkill for any LRL!


And a good tip to the pro-LRLs:
Sell your LRL to people from Canada, Syberia and Australia and where are huge deserts,
jungles, untouched woods or ice-plains!

For those who are way too stupid to understand what I wanna tell here:

For most regions a LRL would be the same as for an usual metal detector a site
where every 2-3 cm nails and alu-shards are scattered around!

So have fun at places where no civilsation is within a radius of 100 km you pro-LRLs!!!
Perhaps this is the best place where you should go, anyway!
Do yourself a favour, detect gold at the arctic-circle and please: stay there forever!
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.