#1
|
||||
|
||||
A Few of the LRLs I've Tested
Just a very small sample of the many L-rods and LRLs I've tested. (Not counting probably 50 different pendulums of all varieties) Much of my data was collected and recorded before I had a digital camera, so no pics exist of those, and the data is stored in 3-ring binders.
Not shown here, were E-scopes 201 and 301, 5 different versions of Don Darnell Chemical Rods, 2 models of Carl Anderson rods, a Sam "Lobo" Wolfe rod, a cavity-tuned LRL rod and 4 different prototype LRLs that I cannot name because of the Non-Disclosure Agreement I signed. Not all testing was specifically to prove or dis-prove "signal lines" but some of it was. Based on the evidence, I personally collected, and the devices I tested; I can say for sure I found NOTHING to substantiate the claim (by dowsers and LRL users) that "signal lines" exist in the real physical world. The bulk of my testing was concluded years ago, however, if new "convincing" evidence was presented today, I would certainly be compelled to look at it, and adjust my conclusions --if need be. Say.... how do you like your crow anyway? With a little salt and pepper, perhaps some BBQ sauce.
__________________
The Wallet-Miner's Creed Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
|
|
|