#1
|
||||
|
||||
The so-called PHENOMENON
What do we know about the so-called PHENOMENON?
Following Hung's attempt at debunkering (presumably he actually means "debunking", but that's another issue) by posting a highly suspect video, the description of this PHENOMENON is now even more confused. Here's what I mean: Do you remember Hung's post, where he stated: "Gold is the most powerful 'self defensive' metal when it comes to avoid any harm to its structure, such as rust, oxidation, etc. Its DNA produces a substance which coats the metal to fight against those 'threats'." From: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...8&postcount=41 This substance would make LRL detecting impossible, because the gold is protected against the annoying cyanide-producing bacteria that dissolves other buried metals. If (according to Hung) the gold DNA protects the gold against corrosion, then gold ions will not dissolve in the ground or float in a convenient cloud 7.2 feet above the buried gold. So the obvious conclusion is that ionic detectors cannot work. But according to LRL theory, if there are no gold ions dissolving in the soil, then the soil will have no anomaly nor will there be an electrostatic, ground voltage, or magnetic anomaly. The only way left to find the gold is to detect it with a metal detector. In the video it is demonstrated (rather clumsily) that the PD can detect a gold ring at some unbelievable distance. Analysis of this video has shown it to be an unreliable source of information. Not only is the detection taking place indoors, but it is goes against all that has been stated previously by LRL proponents, and most strongly by Hung. How many times have we heard statements to the effect that Carl must take his FG80 to the middle of nowhere to perform a proper test, and not to test it indoors or with the electronic dog fence activated? But here we see a similar device operating quite reliably inside the house, even though it's not buried, and presumably not emitting ions (or more recently electrons). Personally, if I was going to fabricate a pseudoscientific theory to describe detection of gold at unbelievable distances, I would at least make an attempt to be consistent. Now recently we are starting to hear stories of detection at 10km. What does anyone else think? Truth or sheer bunkem? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|