|
|
#26
09-03-2008, 01:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Just I respond in similar terms! Regards Esteban 
|
|
#27
09-03-2008, 01:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 , you'll obtain the only information about it... maybe at size of a book.
|
|
#28
09-03-2008, 02:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Regards, Fred.
|
|
#29
09-03-2008, 04:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regards Esteban
|
|
#30
09-03-2008, 09:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Regards, Fred.
|
|
#31
11-20-2008, 06:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The scientists who figure out how to navigate to the moon, and how to find ore deposits 5000 feet below the surface are brilliant engineers that devote their time to cutting edge technology. They work with the most advanced methods to improve the current state of the art technology. So why don't these scientists put effort into improving LRLs? Could it be because they are rolling on the floor with laughter at the very thought that a BFO can locate buried treasure? Do you suppose they consider LRLs a waste of time the same as Carl-NC does? Think about it... If a NASA scientist were to believe that an LRL could work, then wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that he would build one for a hobby in hopes of finding fabulous wealth so he could quit his job and retire? I think he would do this if he believed there is a chance. But what do we see? No scientist has ever made any post stating he has become wealthy from using or from improving an LRL ever. When a scientist walks away from what he considers a bogus idea, then how can we non-scientists presume to know better? Where are the huge unbelievably fabuosly treasures that have been recovered from LRLs? (not the fake stories from the past with low res photos, but eye-witness accounts of an LRL finding treasure)? Do you suppose these accounts of LRLs finding treasure in front of eye witnesses don't exist? Have you wondered why nobody on earth is willing to demonstrate an LRL recovering treasure? It couldn't be because these LRLs can't find treasure, could it? Is it any wonder why a scientist will not give the time of day to devote to promoting LRL treasure machines? Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#32
11-20-2008, 09:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You're from USA. NASA's homeland. I'm from South America. And you don't know about this. Now when they are able to know the gold deposit from the space, why in the hell they would need a LRL for!??? Another subject for you to meditate in bed: Why US are always involved in wars??  Quote:
What this same scientist would do if he could recover a UFO or he happened to host an alien in his home? Would he make a press release of call CNN right away? Have a nice day.
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
|
|
#33
11-20-2008, 11:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hung, J_P, all
Whe're walking on earth, so we need a cheap method just for found treasures, not mapping, this is out of my/our expectations. NASA has (and need) aerial or spacial mapping method, this is, into his method of searching. Treasure searching is more for hobbyist, maybe not interesting for mining companies, USA government, etc. Except shipwreck treasures, searching for real companies dedicated for recovery big treasures in the sea, also is out of my expectations. Desert salt in Bolivia today is of interest causes the most source of lithium in the world, and is one of the most viewable site from space. An astronaut said that it differs very well because the salt desert shines as a great light source. The persons who do not have money for to buy a very expensive detector, be must experiment and search with his domestic, but effective methods, of search and this is cheaper to be constructed an electronic LRL. One constructs these devices knowing that behind a treasure hides some phenomenon that makes it detectable for domestic methods, as for example type magnetic absorption. Regards Esteban
|
|
#34
11-20-2008, 01:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You have a nice day also.
|
|
#35
11-20-2008, 01:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#36
11-21-2008, 02:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
LrL
Now if someone made the real thing"Why in the hell would he or she post anything on this forum..CIA,FBI KGB OR WHATEVER would be looking for them
: lol:I would be getting stinking rich first and not tell anyone I have a working LRL I would also take CARL'S MONEY and the MILL that's $1,000,000So why is it no one is taking CARL'S MONEY, Chit I would fly to Carl take his money and go home if I had a real LRL. It is free money for the taking  So now if you have a working LRL take CARL'S MONEY $25,000 dead ones  :rolle yes::rolle yes::rolle yes::rolle yes::rolle yes::rolle yes::rolle yes:
|
|
#37
11-21-2008, 04:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
hung -- full of BS as usual
Quote:
Is hung saying the NASA's method for mapping of the earth's mineral deposits is a secret, and the people who live in the USA should know about it? Hahahahahahaaaaaaaaa... Before you accuse others of being completely misinformed, perhaps you should read the posts in this forum. You will find that you first learned about how NASA mapped the gold deposits from a post I made, and followed up with your reply that "gamma rays as you know are unstable and difficult to deal with" See your post: http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/s...38&postcount=9 You will also note that this was your reply to my post stating that the Bickel gold detector is designed to find only the stable isotope of gold: 79Au196. Do you suppose you were wrong when you stated that gamma rays are unstable and difficult to deal with? Are you aware that there is no instability in the Bickel gold sensing machine? Are you aware that this was the detector used by NASA in their satellites to map the world's gold and other mineral deposits? Are you aware that there is no secret about this mapping technology? Would you like to see the NASA web page that tells how they locate minerals using gamma spectroscopy? Look here: http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/sc...tillators.html The work of mapping the world's mineral deposits was done decades ago. Today scintillation from the stable nuclide of gold is still used, but with more modern sensors. When the CZT solid state detectors become as sensitive as the photomultiplier tubes and crystals, they will probably replace the crystal/tube assembly. So how secret is all this NASA technology for mapping the earth's minerals? How did I know about it while you expressed your doubts because "gamma rays are unstable and difficult to deal with"? Why are we able to read about this alleged "top secret technology" on the NASA web page? How come what I read on the NASA web page reveals exactly the same method that their designer, Dr. Bickel explained to me in the 1980s? Is it possible this "top secret technology" is just another load of hung BS? You will find there are quite a few related instruments and methods that NASA uses to map the earth and other planets, as well as to determine the elements in stars... which are also explained on NASAs web page among other places. You will note there are no calculators glued to the scintillators used by NASA to find gold. Also, no antennas connected to a bent wire to transfer signals, no search coils or ferrite sensors, no BFO or off resonant circuits, no hot melt glue. Just plain old electronic engineering that works every time to detect a gamma signature. So what have we learned today, hung? Have we learned that you still have an aversion to reading facts, and prefer telling fairy tales because you think they sound cooler? Have we learned you don't have a clue about what you're talking about, and just make up any old story that you think people will believe? I wonder if I should believe all the stories you told about finding fabulous treasures with your LRLs? Think so? Best wishes, J_P Some people are so dum they should have a song written about them... http://h1.ripway.com/Forum_Weasel/forum/whosdum.html
|
|
#38
11-21-2008, 08:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Either start mass producing a working LRL for sale after some proof that it works, or post up all the details of a working LRL for others to use. These 2 options are the only ones that make any logical sense in trying to convince others that LRLs really work. Other than these 2 options then folks will think they are not being truthful .Everyone is entitled to believe what they want but there is nothing like proof when trying to convince others.If someone stated they have a vehicle that can travel to mars, what would you think ?
|
|
#39
11-21-2008, 08:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
PS. By the way JP, you are the one who is full of BS. The liar who made others believe you had a working PD. Duh...
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
|
|
#41
11-22-2008, 12:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So please JP do believe in Hung´s BS, it will be Christmas soon and he needs it... Quote:
|
|
#42
11-22-2008, 01:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dell said, "A NASA earth Scientist was this dumb Hillbilly's mentor and advisor, for Harmonic Induction Frequency Discrimination"
Hung said, "Because this Hung from South America knows a scientist who worked for NASA and knows about it." Sounds like NASA is just chocked full of El-Ar-El experts. Maybe this is the technology they're using to locate all those new planets. Hmmmm.... since I used to work at NASA, here's a quote fer ya: "A former NASA engineer has analyzed LRLs and found them to be completely bogus." - Carl
|
|
#43
11-22-2008, 02:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
...Just like i believe in Santa Clause! Why should I doubt the mind of a child and spoil his favorite beliefs? Shall we all bow down in awe of hung's fantastic feats with his top secret LRL? ...and the magnificent treasures he found with it and his other LRLs? I bet we will see some credible proof of Santa Clause sliding down the chimney with presents before we see credible proof that hung found any treasure with an LRL. Think so? Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#44
11-22-2008, 02:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
 "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"
|
|
#45
11-22-2008, 06:15 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So tell us hung... what secret methods did this scientist who worked for NASA tell you was used to find gold from satellites? Was it the same gamma spectroscopy method shown on the NASA web page? Can you elaborate on the details of this "top secret technology?" Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#47
11-23-2008, 12:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#48
11-23-2008, 12:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have given so much real information and very usefully from my experience. If you do not value it, you do not deserve it either. Regards Esteban
|
|
#50
11-23-2008, 06:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The big one (Real LRL)
Quote:
Anyone can find metal with this coil on my XLPRO.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
