Distant treasure locator Mole PROSPECTOR

[Nicolas]

Hi all my friends here I have find this New Digital LRL. I ask if someone tested this LRL working Good and how to discriminate the buried metal's.














It is suitable for:

• gold prospecting
• detection of ornaments and other highly-conductive metals (such as gold, silver, copper, bronze)
• detection of large amount of jewels
• detection of gravel and nugget deposits in rocks and underground
• detection of treasures buried long ago;
• industrial purposes (detection of pipes and non voltage cables buried long ago).

Operation details:
All metals specified above form a static electric field around themselves that can be detected from the ground surface. The distance of detection varies according to size, conductivity, depth and period of stay underground. Metals with high conductivity, such as gold and silver, are detected more easily since they form a larger electric field and the device can locate them from a distance.
The maximum tested depth of detection is 6 meters and the distance when a signal is audible is about 15-20 meters before the point of the buried object (walking towards the object). Theoretically, the depth of detection could be greater, depending on the factors described above.
The earth is constantly being bombarded by powerful radio frequencies transmitted by the military, satellites, radio, and lightnings. These broadcasts induce electric currents in underground conductive materials.
Induced currents produce secondary electromagnetic fields, which can be detected on the ground surface through amplified deviations of the normal field woth very low frequency. Electrons also travel in a wave that can be located from distance. The highest reading over an object visibly stands out from neutral ground.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FyItsm29o8


http://deltapulse.eu/?p=83&lang=it

[king40]

Hi nic
One of the my friend have lrl like this
But my friend say this is s chemica lrl !
And worked very well

[Nicolas]

Originally Posted by king40

Hi nic
One of the my friend have lrl like this
But my friend say this is s chemica lrl !
And worked very well

Hi King thank my dear to reply of me
You mean is like devices of mineoro Have ionic room with substance.
Maybe your friend is correct but I not think.


If your friend have picture can we send this here?

[king40]

Originally Posted by Nicolas

Hi King thank my dear to reply of me
You mean is like devices of mineoro Have ionic room with substance.
Maybe your friend is correct but I not think.


If your friend have picture can we send this here?

Hi nici
First i see my friend detector
I say too this is minero
But this is wrong think
Yes it worked by ion
And make different with minero
My friend build by own and i can't take picture
But when he want to build i see some material he used
If you want i can give you some information

[Nicolas]

Originally Posted by king40

Hi nici
First i see my friend detector
I say too this is minero
But this is wrong think
Yes it worked by ion
And make different with minero
My friend build by own and i can't take picture
But when he want to build i see some material he used
If you want i can give you some information

Thank you my Brother welcome I m waiting your

[FrancoItaly]

Hi Nicolas
I think that this Lrl works because I know that the "phenomenon" is real and his behavior on the field is very similar to mine lrl, the only difference is that my lrl is most sensitive in the direction south to north, the minimum sensitivity is in a north to south direction and a medium sensitivity is in the east-west direction and vice versa. Apart from this, reading the user manual, the operation is almost identical to my lrl. Unfortunately due to health problems I have not been able to experience enough my lrl in other fields far from my field test. The price, over 3000 Euros, is quite high, especially when compared, for example, to my lrl: the scheme is free and components cost a few tens of Euros.

Best Regards

[Nicolas]

Originally Posted by FrancoItaly

Hi Nicolas
I think that this Lrl works because I know that the "phenomenon" is real and his behavior on the field is very similar to mine lrl, the only difference is that my lrl is most sensitive in the direction south to north, the minimum sensitivity is in a north to south direction and a medium sensitivity is in the east-west direction and vice versa. Apart from this, reading the user manual, the operation is almost identical to my lrl. Unfortunately due to health problems I have not been able to experience enough my lrl in other fields far from my field test. The price, over 3000 Euros, is quite high, especially when compared, for example, to my lrl: the scheme is free and components cost a few tens of Euros.

Best Regards

Hi my Dear Franco first I wish you good health and take care of you

Second You are Right and correct I agree with you

For your LRL exist many People build your LRL in various countries of the world and try it .. So then I tell you these news about your LRL.

[FrancoItaly]

Hi Nicolas
Thank you for your wishes of good health, with regard to ionic chamber'm not sure it will work but I have not done many experiments. And also not only reveals the gold because in the video you can see pieces of silver or bronze.

Best Regards

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by Nicolas

Hi all my friends here I have find this New Digital LRL. I ask if someone tested this LRL working Good and how to discriminate the buried metal's.





It is suitable for:

• gold prospecting
• detection of ornaments and other highly-conductive metals (such as gold, silver, copper, bronze)
• detection of large amount of jewels
• detection of gravel and nugget deposits in rocks and underground
• detection of treasures buried long ago;
• industrial purposes (detection of pipes and non voltage cables buried long ago).

Operation details:
All metals specified above form a static electric field around themselves that can be detected from the ground surface. The distance of detection varies according to size, conductivity, depth and period of stay underground. Metals with high conductivity, such as gold and silver, are detected more easily since they form a larger electric field and the device can locate them from a distance.
The maximum tested depth of detection is 6 meters and the distance when a signal is audible is about 15-20 meters before the point of the buried object (walking towards the object). Theoretically, the depth of detection could be greater, depending on the factors described above.
The earth is constantly being bombarded by powerful radio frequencies transmitted by the military, satellites, radio, and lightnings. These broadcasts induce electric currents in underground conductive materials.
Induced currents produce secondary electromagnetic fields, which can be detected on the ground surface through amplified deviations of the normal field woth very low frequency. Electrons also travel in a wave that can be located from distance. The highest reading over an object visibly stands out from neutral ground.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FyItsm29o8

http://deltapulse.eu/?p=83&lang=it

This detector does not detect ionic phenomenon - The video that the factory published proves it does not.
If you watch their video, you will see it detected a freshly buried sample that was put under the ground by the factory team.
How do we know there was no ionic activity from these coins?
All ionic leaching of gold, copper and silver happens when the ground is moist for a long enough time for a colony of cyanide-secreting bacteria to grow and attack the surface of the metals.
This usually takes a number of years, and the amount of ionic activity from the gold or silver will not be apparent until many years later, when the rain cycles draw the ions up toward the soil surface.

But these coins spent very little time under the ground. The brick that covered the pot was still clean and dry.
See the factory video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FyItsm29o8
You can see the pot and all the coins inside are dry and clean. Only loose dirt fell off the top of the brick and pot they buried, with no signs of water stains.
These coins are chemically and electrically identical to coins that are not buried. It is not possible for any natural chemical ionization, not even at the parts per trillion level.

Because the coins were freshly buried and insulated from the soil, we know this detector did not beep because it found ions coming from the pot of coins.
So the question is why did it beep?
And why did it beep from several meters distance?

Some possible answers:

1. Factory team explanation:
"All metals specified above form a static electric field around themselves that can be detected from the ground surface.
The distance of detection varies according to size, conductivity, depth and period of stay underground"...
..."The earth is constantly being bombarded by powerful radio frequencies transmitted by the military, satellites, radio, and lightnings. These broadcasts induce electric currents in underground conductive materials. Induced currents produce secondary electromagnetic fields, which can be detected on the ground surface through amplified deviations of the normal field woth very low frequency. Electrons also travel in a wave that can be located from distance. The highest reading over an object visibly stands out from neutral ground".

This may seem reasonable to an ignorant person who doesn't know how ionic leaching happens, or how it interacts with ground currents or static fields in the air.
However, They showed us a video where this locator was beeping at a pot of dry coins sheltered inside a dry clay pot with a dry brick on top of it.
It is not possible that locator was detecting any chemical/ionic action from those coins. So what made this locator beep?

2. The LRL manufacturer trick explanation:
It could be a trick to fool people into believing that it detects long time buried gold.
Maybe this locator has an RF detector inside, and they used a transmitter to fool people, the same way that Alonso from Mineoro did.
It would be easy to make this video while someone holds an RF transmitter a few meters to the side where the camera cannot see.
Then he could switch on the transmitter when the locator came close to the location where they buried the coins, and he could sweep the frequency up and down and make the squealing noise we heard from the locator.
What's more likely? Did the locator detect ionic signals from the dry coins that did not contact the soil? ---- or was it a trick?

Of course, no LRL manufacturer would do such a thing as to trick their customers. We all know that the stories of tricks from the Mineoro factory that Morgan told were probably mistakes, and the failure of the OKM locator at their factory was probably just a bad transistor, or something like that.... And the photos Robocarpanda sent showing Alonso's hidden transmitter to make fake LRL beeping...


Hmmm... This doesn't look good...

3. Maybe a good idea to test this locator to see if it can find a long-time buried treasure in the places where you go treasure hunting before paying 2980.00 euros

Best wishes,
J_P

[Nicolas]

Thanks my dear to explain that. I understand that good and trick. I think it's real locator like PD with big coil seeying this tube diameter 100mm and ferrite rod in the other tube diameter 32
Thanks

[Sneshko]

Dear Friends!
In the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FyItsm29o8 to LRL Mole Prospector comes the trick with the transmitter and receiver. Do not fooled on it.
Welcome back to the Forum dear J_Player!!!
Regards!
Sneshko

[WM6]

Originally Posted by Sneshko

LRL Mole Prospector comes the trick with the transmitter and receiver.

Sneshko

Yes, prospector was clearly trained by MSS (mineoro scam staff).

[Sneshko]

Originally Posted by WM6

Yes, prospector was clearly trained by MSS (mineoro scam staff).

Absolutely correct dear WM6!
Regards!
Sneshko