Dowsing by "Albert Einstein"

Geo · #1 01-23-2013, 07:10 AM

Hi.
I have read this

"I know very well that many scientists consider dowsing as they do astrology, as a type of ancient superstition. According to my conviction this is, unjustified. The dowsing rod is a simple instrument which shows the uncanny reaction of the human nervous system to certain factors which are unknown to us at this time." Albert Einstein.

If this is true then maybe the pseudosceptics have a big problem.......

Regards

Ref.... http://soulsearchers.spheresoflight....p?page=dowsing

Dedevil · #2 01-23-2013, 07:55 AM

I am sure AE had more knowledge on the subject. And pointed towards the nervous system "electrical" but he was busy on other topics
pseudosceptics are just religiously biased and uneducated or educated towards their own religion belief. Like JP they are a BRICK IN THE WALL. Put them up against someones ideas like Steven Hawkings who argues with scientific evidence that GOD did not make the universe and you get a real discussion with them not having a leg to stand on.
But here we are lower down the food chain.

rgds

matrix · #3 01-25-2013, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedevil

I am sure AE had more knowledge on the subject. And pointed towards the nervous system "electrical" but he was busy on other topics

I think AE was Contemporary busy on everything Environment such elementary particles , gravity, astronomy, relativity ,newtons laws ,... and all of he was pointed on is Correlate with lrls. and no bothy can show this idea is Contrary.
best wishes

WM6 · #4 01-23-2013, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

Hi.
I have read this

"I know very well that many scientists consider dowsing as they do astrology, as a type of ancient superstition. According to my conviction this is, unjustified. The dowsing rod is a simple instrument which shows the uncanny reaction of the human nervous system to certain factors which are unknown to us at this time." Albert Einstein.

If this is true then maybe the pseudosceptics have a big problem.......

Regards

This is true, Geo, except presumption that "certain factors are unknown".
Certain factors are mostly already known.

Read, par example, explanation about "certain factors" here:

http://www.longrangelocators.com/for...4&postcount=14

Geo · #5 01-23-2013, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WM6

This is true, Geo, except presumption that "certain factors are unknown".
Certain factors are mostly already known.

Read, par example, explanation about "certain factors" here:

http://www.longrangelocators.com/for...4&postcount=14

....and what about the "ideomotor" who says some sceptics????

Regards

WM6 · #6 01-23-2013, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

....and what about the "ideomotor" who says some sceptics????

Regards

"Ideomotor" is the same things as AE "shows the uncanny reaction of the human nervous system", saying by other words only.

Trigger for those "ideomotor" can be outer (environment marks) or inner (your conscious, or real info where target is buried).

Geo · #7 01-23-2013, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WM6

"Ideomotor" is the same things as AE "shows the uncanny reaction of the human nervous system", saying by other words only.

Trigger for those "ideomotor" can be outer (environment marks) or inner (your conscious, or real info where target is buried).

Sceptics believes that it is only inner....

WM6 · #8 01-23-2013, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

Sceptics believes that it is only inner....

"Ideomotor" works inner in your nervous system (that control your body movement), but trigger that shutted "ideomotor" to work, can be inner or outer or combined.

Qiaozhi · #9 01-23-2013, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

Hi.
I have read this

"I know very well that many scientists consider dowsing as they do astrology, as a type of ancient superstition. According to my conviction this is, unjustified. The dowsing rod is a simple instrument which shows the uncanny reaction of the human nervous system to certain factors which are unknown to us at this time." Albert Einstein.

If this is true then maybe the pseudosceptics have a big problem.......

Regards

Ref.... http://soulsearchers.spheresoflight....p?page=dowsing

See question 5 ->
http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/page...nfo/lrl_qa.dat

Fred · #10 01-23-2013, 02:22 PM

I see no contradiction in this phrase even if it is from him... Einstein also said that nothing can travel faster than light, but man is building a prototype engine that will allow us to do it, not breaking any of his laws, distorting space (and time).
Nowadays, it i obvious that the nervous system IS involved, together with our mind, by making dowsing work as we "expect" to do ....
By the way, Nostradamus said a lot of thing so obscures, that we can now freely interpret them as being true and associate them to real events.

...Just like random beeping

Qiaozhi · #11 01-23-2013, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred

By the way, Nostradamus said a lot of thing so obscures, that we can now freely interpret them as being true and associate them to real events.

...Just like random beeping

Otherwise known as selective memory.

Fred · #12 01-23-2013, 04:27 PM

Yes, and when someone has a beautiful dream (or belief, like "lrl is working" for example ) , it is easier find reasons to keep believing, than to accept a harder reality, which requires some some courage.
Searching for technical evidence (like double blind tests) are also seen like a threat to this dream.
In Matrix for example, some would have refused to take the pill that takes you to the real world

Geo · #13 01-23-2013, 07:29 PM

You never will understand!!!!! because you don't like to understand. Double blind tests says nothing for me. For me if the LRL has 20...30% success then it is special. I"ll go out for T.H 10 times and i"ll find twice something expensive. Why i must look for "double blind tests" if i make my job and without it???

Geo · #14 01-23-2013, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

See question 5 ->
http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/page...nfo/lrl_qa.dat

Question 5 don't prove anything....

Qiaozhi · #15 01-23-2013, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

Question 5 don't prove anything....

Nor does hearsay and Chinese whispers.

Carl-NC · #16 01-26-2013, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geo

"I know very well that many scientists consider dowsing as they do astrology, as a type of ancient superstition. According to my conviction this is, unjustified. The dowsing rod is a simple instrument which shows the uncanny reaction of the human nervous system to certain factors which are unknown to us at this time." Albert Einstein.

This is actually a fabricated quote. Al never said it.

Geo · #17 01-26-2013, 09:56 AM

OK, i wrote what i readed, so i am not so sure.
Are you sure 100% for what you say???

Regards

g-sani · #18 03-08-2013, 01:29 PM

In todays world there are many things that work and give results but we still don't know how.I probably wrote about this again some time ago but it is worth to repeat it.
When elephants are in desert and feel thirsty all they do is just go to the right place and dig the sand using their long nose.And.... water comes up and they fill up their big bellies
Do you think science knows how they do it? But may be you believe that elephants are more clever than man.

Is this some form of dowsing? Well I believe it is.
Sea turtles can swim thousands of miles sometimes and still find their way back to the beach they were born on many years prior.They will retun to their birth place island to lay their eggs.
Humans still practising dowsing after thousands of years.

My apologies to you skeptics but it has to be something true about dowsing no matter what you say.
Regards
g-sani