|
|
|
|
#1
09-18-2009, 11:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Can someone with a LRL do an experiment for me?
IF you have an old school LRL where you can adjust the frequency, could you try an experiment with the following frequency and tell me the results? Please be someone that knows how to use a LRL.
The frequency is: 72919 Hz (.72919 kHz). Thanks Frank 
|
|
#7
09-19-2009, 05:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Your freq. is OK! 
|
|
#8
09-19-2009, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
FrankMD, my frequency generator only has .1 hz adjustment so I used 729.2 hz. Just curious why you are using this frequency? There are some frequencies you can try on the LRL reports page. I've been messing with the ones on the Treasure Scope Quad report. Not real strong, but...
|
|
#9
09-19-2009, 11:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Mike,
Where is the LRL reports page? Back in the early 90's I did a lot of controlled experients with using a signal generator and various rods . I was using 5 kHz for gold, 8.7 kHz for silver and 4.5 kHz for lead. I used lead because it was cheaper than gold and I had a collection of different sizes. Before I got into that I bought some land in Oregon, needed a well and dowsed a 30 gpm well in an area with dry wells and that was why the land wouldn't sell. So I bought the land contingent on a good well. The well company said that would drill in a convient spot. So I believe we as humans have the ability to sense the very small field anomolies in the earths field and elf, frequencies, etc. created by water underground or underground voids. So with the frquency generator set to a specific freq for gold their is a very small change that our brains can detect and the rods show us. So that frequency I asked someone to try is one based on physics similar to how a proton magnetometer works. Realted to nuclear magnetic resonance, the nuclear moment for gold is based on theta y over 2 pie for AU (197). Where theat y is e over 2 Mc. Anyway I have an advance physics books that has that calculated for gold and is the frequency I mentioned, 729.19 Hz. So I was curious if that frequency might have a strong response. I may sound a bit nuts but I am just curious about all this and believe our brain as a receiver is very much not known what it is capable of. Frank
|
|
#10
09-20-2009, 12:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#12
09-20-2009, 09:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But can you put here citation of paragraph where gold frequency is discussed?
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life? You have right to self-defence!
|
|
#13
09-20-2009, 12:20 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I see what you mean. But don't try to 'convert' certain frequencies based on 'supposed Teslas' generated by Earth which comes up with 'checked' frequencies that in theory would respond. These calculations altough correct only for NMR conversions and corresponding magnitudes are completely off for magnetic grid points and dowsing related detection. Bear in mind that all substances have several and several related frequencies which make up its weight, shape, color, density, etc. So, it's not a surprise, there are so many different frequencies for gold by the way. The several MFD frequencies people report might even be correct in some extent altough some are 'more relevant' than others. This explains why some are sucessful and others are more prone to 'interferences' from other substances and end up with failures. Regards. Quote:
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
|
|
#14
09-20-2009, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the response Hung.
Yes is is way more complex than what I wrote. It has also to do with nuclear moments and quantum objects. It was just that my pysics book specically talked about the 729.19 Hz for gold. If I had a scanner I'd scan the page and so you could see what I'm talikg about in a complete way. Frank
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
