Radionics

[hung]

Reading the examiner's explanation on Rangertell's site and looking at the pictures of the circuitry, I come to the conclusion that it's a radionic device.
User interacts with circuit and becomes probably the main component.
Radionics were famous in the 30's and I researched it a lot in the past by the works of Abrahams, Drown and others when I was involved in a scientific project. It's a mix of electronics and body/mind energy with earth's electromagnetic field. Very, very interesting.

Although many here may not agree with me and think radionics is bogus, I suggest them to do a serious reading on the subject because there are sucess reports on it. We don't need to take party on whatever side but absorb information and filter what one thinks it's relevant.

[Rudy]

Originally Posted by hung

Reading the examiner's explanation on Rangertell's site and looking at the pictures of the circuitry, I come to the conclusion that it's a radionic device.

User interacts with circuit and becomes probably the main component.
Radionics were famous in the 30's and I researched it a lot in the past by the works of Abrahams, Drown and others when I was involved in a scientific project. It's a mix of electronics and body/mind energy with earth's electromagnetic field. Very, very interesting. Although many here may not agree with me and think radionics is bogus, I suggest them to do a serious reading on the subject because there are sucess reports on it. We don't need to take party on whatever side but absorb information and filter what one thinks it's relevant.

So you think the Rangertell operates on the same principle as Faith Healing? Sure, why not. Filter is hard at work.

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by hung

Reading the examiner's explanation on Rangertell's site and looking at the pictures of the circuitry, I come to the conclusion that it's a radionic device.
User interacts with circuit and becomes probably the main component.
Radionics were famous in the 30's and I researched it a lot in the past by the works of Abrahams, Drown and others when I was involved in a scientific project. It's a mix of electronics and body/mind energy with earth's electromagnetic field. Very, very interesting.

Although many here may not agree with me and think radionics is bogus, I suggest them to do a serious reading on the subject because there are sucess reports on it. We don't need to take party on whatever side but absorb information and filter what one thinks it's relevant.

Here's the original bogus report I made on the Ranger Tell Examiner (direct from their website) but now with an added synopsis saying that the report refers to a prototype model. Funny how they're backing away from the report now they know I'm a skeptic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q. Is there a scientific report by someone re the Rangertell Examiner?

A. Here is one written by an independent not connected with Rangertell that was sent to us.

"The operating principle of LRLs is not immediately obvious if viewed from the perspective of accepted physics. First hand examination of these devices will reveal an apparently simplistic construction that obscures the complex subtlety of their design.

Two types are described here. The first is similar to the Rangertell Examiner, and the other is an advanced electronic device that operates on the same underlying principle as the Mineoro detectors.

For example, the Rangertell Examiner may appear at first sight to contain just a handful of components that seem loosely connected in some arbitrary fashion. This conclusion is far from the truth, as will be explained fully in the following analysis.

One of the most confusing aspects of the Examiner design is the enameled wire that protrudes through the case and terminates just below the calculator housing without any apparent connection. This type of connection can be explained by reference to the work carried out by Zaev, Avramenko and Lisin on displacement current. According to the authors – "The measurement of the polarisation current in matter can clean up the long-standing dispute about the nature of dielectric permeability of metals, and also make possible the transmission of energy along an isolated conductor without a galvanically closed current circuit. Nicholai Tesla demonstrated this on 1st February 1892 in London but the description of the method applied by him for such a transmission line has not been preserved."

A simple circuit (known as Avramenko’s fork) can be used to demonstrate this method of energy transmission.
http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/...ttachmentid=411

Note that there is no connection between the load and a common terminal, such as ground. The load is quite simply isolated from ground, but it still receives power.

This type of circuit is not subject to Kirchoff’s current and voltage laws, and the output current measured in the load is not appreciatively affected by inserting a capacitor of 0.1uF in the line. This is the underlying principle of power derivation within the Examiner LRL, and the reason why the device needs no battery supply other than that provided by the calculator. Power to the circuit (a modified form of Avramenko’s fork) is provided directly by the calculator allowing precise tuning by the operator.

Although the original circuit contained two diodes, the version in the Examiner makes use of resonance techniques and longitudinal wave coupling to boost the energy to a level necessary for long range detection. The human component is also an essential part of the design. Just as a tuning fork (or in this case Avramenko’s fork) has natural frequencies for sound, the planet Earth has natural frequencies, called Schumann resonances, and the human brain has natural frequencies for electromagnetic radiation. It is known that that the Earth’s Schumann resonances are "in tune" with the human brain’s alpha and theta states. But since the Schumann resonance is very low, at about 7.5Hz, the frequencies programmed via the calculator must be down-converted and fine-tuned for effective long-range location to take place. In addition, the Schumann resonance can fluctuate by + or – 0.5Hz depending on the properties of the Earth’s electromagnetic cavity.

The natural frequencies of the human brain are:

• • Beta waves (14 to 30Hz)
  • Alpha waves (8 to 13Hz)
  • Theta waves (4 to 7 Hz)
  • Delta waves (1 to 3Hz)

This explains the inclusion of adjustable elements in the fork / down-converter circuit.

Although the underlying operating principle is complex and difficult to explain, the demonstrable success of these devices has been shown on a number of occasions. Unfortunately LRLs rarely work out-of-the-box, and may need to become acclimatised to their owner over a period of time. Perseverance is the key to successful hunting with an LRL.

1. It is important that the end of the wire should protrude through the case, and terminate just below the calculator chip. In most calculators this chip is located near to the center of the unit."

SYNOPSIS FROM TELL

1. This refers to the prototype Examiner version 1.0 which was an early attempt (only 10 made). The Examiner T-G 7 01 06 is light years ahead of this. The reason for the price is that we have tested exclusive frequencies to Rangertell and spent years testing it in every conceivable environment. It is still at least a tenth of the average price for this type of unit , that has none of the features we provide. The adept geek may build a look-alike but it will not perform anywhere near the real Examiner. Alignment for instance is more important than first appears and you don't get the POS system to determine depth, distance , shape and weight or the R&D frequencies. You can build a reasonable beeping metal detector too for $50. But it won't perform anywhere near the commercially accepted product because there is no R&D. With more than 500 Rangertell units sold which means about 1000 users and no complaints except from a stereotyped skeptic or two, 100 percent acceptance is the answer to that one.
   2. You are not of course connecting your head to the stratosphere. You are allowing magnetic resonance to fulfill the requirements of the detection frequency in relation to the target. If you enter 7 into a tuned Examiner and walk you will determine the grid pattern that is evident round the Earth every 7 feet .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The full fairy story can be found here -> http://www.rangertell.com/frequently...uestions-a.htm

[Rudy]

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

Here's the original bogus report I made on the Ranger Tell Examiner (direct from their website) but now with an added synopsis saying that the report refers to a prototype model. Funny how they're backing away from the report now they know I'm a skeptic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q. Is there a scientific report by someone re the Rangertell Examiner?

A. Here is one written by an independent not connected with Rangertell that was sent to us.

"The operating principle of LRLs is not immediately obvious if viewed from the perspective of accepted physics. First hand examination of these devices will reveal an apparently simplistic construction that obscures the complex subtlety of their design.

Two types are described here. The first is similar to the Rangertell Examiner, and the other is an advanced electronic device that operates on the same underlying principle as the Mineoro detectors.

For example, the Rangertell Examiner may appear at first sight to contain just a handful of components that seem loosely connected in some arbitrary fashion. This conclusion is far from the truth, as will be explained fully in the following analysis.

One of the most confusing aspects of the Examiner design is the enameled wire that protrudes through the case and terminates just below the calculator housing without any apparent connection. This type of connection can be explained by reference to the work carried out by Zaev, Avramenko and Lisin on displacement current. According to the authors – "The measurement of the polarisation current in matter can clean up the long-standing dispute about the nature of dielectric permeability of metals, and also make possible the transmission of energy along an isolated conductor without a galvanically closed current circuit. Nicholai Tesla demonstrated this on 1st February 1892 in London but the description of the method applied by him for such a transmission line has not been preserved."

A simple circuit (known as Avramenko’s fork) can be used to demonstrate this method of energy transmission.
http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/...ttachmentid=411

Note that there is no connection between the load and a common terminal, such as ground. The load is quite simply isolated from ground, but it still receives power.

This type of circuit is not subject to Kirchoff’s current and voltage laws, and the output current measured in the load is not appreciatively affected by inserting a capacitor of 0.1uF in the line. This is the underlying principle of power derivation within the Examiner LRL, and the reason why the device needs no battery supply other than that provided by the calculator. Power to the circuit (a modified form of Avramenko’s fork) is provided directly by the calculator allowing precise tuning by the operator.

Although the original circuit contained two diodes, the version in the Examiner makes use of resonance techniques and longitudinal wave coupling to boost the energy to a level necessary for long range detection. The human component is also an essential part of the design. Just as a tuning fork (or in this case Avramenko’s fork) has natural frequencies for sound, the planet Earth has natural frequencies, called Schumann resonances, and the human brain has natural frequencies for electromagnetic radiation. It is known that that the Earth’s Schumann resonances are "in tune" with the human brain’s alpha and theta states. But since the Schumann resonance is very low, at about 7.5Hz, the frequencies programmed via the calculator must be down-converted and fine-tuned for effective long-range location to take place. In addition, the Schumann resonance can fluctuate by + or – 0.5Hz depending on the properties of the Earth’s electromagnetic cavity.

The natural frequencies of the human brain are:

• • Beta waves (14 to 30Hz)
  • Alpha waves (8 to 13Hz)
  • Theta waves (4 to 7 Hz)
  • Delta waves (1 to 3Hz)

This explains the inclusion of adjustable elements in the fork / down-converter circuit.

Although the underlying operating principle is complex and difficult to explain, the demonstrable success of these devices has been shown on a number of occasions. Unfortunately LRLs rarely work out-of-the-box, and may need to become acclimatised to their owner over a period of time. Perseverance is the key to successful hunting with an LRL.

1. It is important that the end of the wire should protrude through the case, and terminate just below the calculator chip. In most calculators this chip is located near to the center of the unit."

SYNOPSIS FROM TELL

1. This refers to the prototype Examiner version 1.0 which was an early attempt (only 10 made). The Examiner T-G 7 01 06 is light years ahead of this. The reason for the price is that we have tested exclusive frequencies to Rangertell and spent years testing it in every conceivable environment. It is still at least a tenth of the average price for this type of unit , that has none of the features we provide. The adept geek may build a look-alike but it will not perform anywhere near the real Examiner. Alignment for instance is more important than first appears and you don't get the POS system to determine depth, distance , shape and weight or the R&D frequencies. You can build a reasonable beeping metal detector too for $50. But it won't perform anywhere near the commercially accepted product because there is no R&D. With more than 500 Rangertell units sold which means about 1000 users and no complaints except from a stereotyped skeptic or two, 100 percent acceptance is the answer to that one.
   2. You are not of course connecting your head to the stratosphere. You are allowing magnetic resonance to fulfill the requirements of the detection frequency in relation to the target. If you enter 7 into a tuned Examiner and walk you will determine the grid pattern that is evident round the Earth every 7 feet .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The full fairy story can be found here -> http://www.rangertell.com/frequently...uestions-a.htm

I also loved the following passage found in one of the answers in the Rangertell FAQs:

... But in a longer-range metal detector, the electromagnetic coil must actually radiate an electromagnetic wave and then look for the reflection of this electromagnetic wave from a more distant piece of metal. That's because the magnetic field of the coil doesn't extend outward forever--it dies away a few diameters of the coil away from the coil itself. For the metal detector to look for metal farther away, it needs help carrying the magnetic field through space. By combining an electric field with the magnetic field, the long-range metal detector creates an electromagnetic wave--a radio wave--that travels independently through space. Electromagnetic waves reflect from many things, particularly objects that conduct electricity. So the long-range metal detector launches an electromagnetic wave and then looks for the reflection of that wave. "

So, that is the secret! Rather than launching just a magnetic wave, or just an electric wave, the LRL launches an electromagnetic wave.

Nevermind the fact that there are no such things as purely magnetic or purely electric waves.

[hung]

Qiaozhi : Congratulations on your explanation. I think you wrote very plausible things. I don't see the point of after writing such a text you turn and say it's bogus, etc.
You either has a double personality or as I told earlier, unconsciously we may sometimes state the truth.

Rudy: Nowaydays I no longer trust estabilished science anymore. I was involved in a project 12 years ago which simply destroyed many acepted science 'standards'. I think the way to go now with such affirmations as rangertell's is:
Prove that this is NOT possible.

[Qiaozhi]

Originally Posted by hung

Qiaozhi : Congratulations on your explanation. I think you wrote very plausible things. I don't see the point of after writing such a text you turn and say it's bogus, etc.
You either has a double personality or as I told earlier, unconsciously we may sometimes state the truth.

Believe it if you want but it's still bogus.
This reminds me of a similar case, where a group of people went out late at night and created some interesting crop circles. The next day these circles were "discovered", and lots of people got excited. The "experts" were then called in to validate the find by sensing the energy fields and by dowsing. The crop circles were declared to be genuine. When the "experts" were subsequently confronted by the creators of the crop circles they completely refused to believe the facts, even though they were shown a video of the circles being created by rolling plastic barrels filled with sand. One woman even claimed to have seen a UFO land in the field the previous night. Self-delusion is such an interesting subject.

Originally Posted by hung

Prove that this is NOT possible.

That's not the way it works. The onus is on the claimant.

[hung]

Originally Posted by Qiaozhi

When the "experts" were subsequently confronted by the creators of the crop circles they completely refused to believe the facts, even though they were shown a video of the circles being created by rolling plastic barrels filled with sand. One woman even claimed to have seen a UFO land in the field the previous night. Self-delusion is such an interesting subject.


That's not the way it works. The onus is on the claimant.

...

[Jim]

Originally Posted by hung

Reading the examiner's explanation on Rangertell's site and looking at the pictures of the circuitry, I come to the conclusion that it's a radionic device.

Ummm,er......wowsers !!