|
|
|
|
#1
01-07-2012, 09:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
long rang locator
Hello to all
I've searched the internet and I found this circuit.This seems to be a practical circuit. What is your opinion about this circuit and its performance? http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/page...cope/index.dat  Sincerely
|
|
#2
01-07-2012, 10:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Look at the bottom where an electronic engineer tests it: "It is a simple matter for an LRL dealer to "demonstrate" their device using visible targets, showing a prospective customer what to expect when they try it. And when they try it, they usually get the response they were told to expect, due to psychological conditioning. This is exactly what Mr. Thomas does at treasure shows. However, when I saw him performing this misleading demonstration, I asked if he could still detect his target (a gold-and-diamond ring) when he could not see it, and did not know where it was. He said he could, so I challenged him to a simple test using paper cups to conceal the ring. He was highly reluctant to do this, but finally agreed. Although he had been demonstrating his LRLs during the treasure show with 100% "success", when we did the paper cup test, he failed to locate the ring even once in six attempts. This is explained in more detail in the Treasure Scope Test article. My own tests of the Quad failed to produce any response whatsoever. The device gave no indication for a 1-ounce gold bar, a 10-ounce silver bar, and a stack of 20 one-dollar bills, even when the targets were very close, and plainly visible..... ...The operational theory of the Quad is bogus. The claim that the Quad will mechanically lock on a target, is false. The claim that the Quad will detect any "object", is false. The only "things" the Quad is capable of detecting, are gravity and strong wind. Copyright © 2004 Carl W. Moreland, all rights reserved". After you read the entire article that you posted above, then read this: http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/page...omas/index.dat You will see the manufacturer of this supposed LRL was unable to make it work to find where Carl hid the treasure. The person who makes this LRL can only use it to find treasure that he already knows the location of. He cannot make it work to find treasure that he does not know the location of. If this is the kind of treasure locator that you want, then maybe you should buy it. But if you want tools to find treasure that you don't know the location of, maybe it is better to save your money and time for better treasure hunting tools. Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#3
01-07-2012, 10:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If the voltage and current in the antenna is up to you to solve this problem?
|
|
#4
01-07-2012, 11:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let us help make changes for the implementation of this:
Adding filters to improve and enhance the efficiency of this device is?
|
|
#5
01-07-2012, 11:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There is nothing here for me to solve. The solution was already determined by an electronic engineer who was sued for telling the truth that it did not work when manufacturer tested it. The person who manufactured this locator could not make it work at all. So we know it does not work unless you already know the location of the treasure. The solution is known... trash can. Solution for antenna... no extra power is needed. It already is working to find treasure exactly as it does for the manufacturer. You can hide a ring and then use this locator to find the ring as long as you know where the ring is hidden. So you can see it works perfectly just as it did for the manufacturer, with no modifications needed. Modifications to increase the power at the antenna will destroy the ability to find hidden rings that you know the location of. Say hi to mesy64 and Jack for me.  Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#6
01-07-2012, 12:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
01-07-2012, 04:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Because they use the same google translator that you use, and send their posts from the same PC that you do. Did you ever stop to wonder if you are being watched by more people than a few Middle Eastern government officials? : : : From the desktop of mesy64/Jack/Golden_Statue: Translate from: Arabic Type text or a website address or translate a document. Cancel Persian - detected to English translation If the voltage and current in the antenna is up to you to solve this problem? Best wishes, J_P
|
|
#9
01-07-2012, 10:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I suggest you do the same. Build it and test it yourself. Don't rely on anybody's 'reports'. In fact you will be surprised on how maybe up to 90% of the devices featured in that 'report' actually do work. And this might be even a pessimist estimate. I have built some of those claimed 'non working' devices and they did work. Art from TNET forum has used about 7 of them and reported they all worked for him. So go for it. The only person who can tell you if it works or not for you is yourself. As a sidenote, I think XR2206 might be discontinued. You could try a 8038 or another function generator.
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
|
|
#10
02-05-2012, 07:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
audio
Quote:
ty for this post . is this unit have a audio when detect a gold or silver object ?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
