LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2009, 11:40 PM
FrankMD FrankMD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13
Default Can someone with a LRL do an experiment for me?

IF you have an old school LRL where you can adjust the frequency, could you try an experiment with the following frequency and tell me the results? Please be someone that knows how to use a LRL.

The frequency is:

72919 Hz (.72919 kHz).

Thanks

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2009, 12:35 AM
homefire's Avatar
homefire homefire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 57
Default

Do you mean 72Khz?

72919hz?



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2009, 12:46 AM
FrankMD FrankMD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13
Default

Hi,

Whoops sorry I goofed. I mean't

729.19 Hz (.72919 kHz).

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-19-2009, 01:49 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMD View Post
Hi,

Whoops sorry I goofed. I mean't

729.19 Hz (.72919 kHz).

Frank
Is that the transmit or receive frequency?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-19-2009, 05:00 PM
FrankMD FrankMD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13
Default

Transmit
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-19-2009, 05:30 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMD View Post
Transmit

Ok...what is the receive frequency? Or, are you going to transmit/receive the same frequency simultaneously?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-19-2009, 05:44 PM
sweatofglory sweatofglory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMD View Post
Hi,

Whoops sorry I goofed. I mean't

729.19 Hz (.72919 kHz).

Frank

Your freq. is OK!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-19-2009, 11:21 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,105
Default

FrankMD, my frequency generator only has .1 hz adjustment so I used 729.2 hz. Just curious why you are using this frequency? There are some frequencies you can try on the LRL reports page. I've been messing with the ones on the Treasure Scope Quad report. Not real strong, but...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-19-2009, 11:49 PM
FrankMD FrankMD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13
Default

Hi Mike,

Where is the LRL reports page?

Back in the early 90's I did a lot of controlled experients with using a signal generator and various rods . I was using 5 kHz for gold, 8.7 kHz for silver and 4.5 kHz for lead. I used lead because it was cheaper than gold and I had a collection of different sizes.

Before I got into that I bought some land in Oregon, needed a well and dowsed a 30 gpm well in an area with dry wells and that was why the land wouldn't sell. So I bought the land contingent on a good well. The well company said that would drill in a convient spot.

So I believe we as humans have the ability to sense the very small field anomolies in the earths field and elf, frequencies, etc. created by water underground or underground voids.

So with the frquency generator set to a specific freq for gold their is a very small change that our brains can detect and the rods show us.

So that frequency I asked someone to try is one based on physics similar to how a proton magnetometer works. Realted to nuclear magnetic resonance, the nuclear moment for gold is based on theta y over 2 pie for AU (197). Where theat y is e over 2 Mc. Anyway I have an advance physics books that has that calculated for gold and is the frequency I mentioned, 729.19 Hz.

So I was curious if that frequency might have a strong response.

I may sound a bit nuts but I am just curious about all this and believe our brain as a receiver is very much not known what it is capable of.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-20-2009, 12:14 AM
WM6's Avatar
WM6 WM6 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Borovnica, Slovenia
Posts: 2,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMD View Post

Anyway I have an advance physics books that has that calculated for gold and is the frequency I mentioned, 729.19 Hz.
This "advanced physics books" is probably without a title and the issue of publishing "Lunatic". May you cite paragraph in this advanced book where this frequency is mentioned?
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-20-2009, 12:19 AM
FrankMD FrankMD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13
Default

The name of the physics book:


"Encyclopedia of Physics" (second edition) by Rita G. Lerner/George L. Trigg

VCH Publishers, Inc.

I not here to prove anything to anyone. Just looking for a little open minded discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-20-2009, 09:37 PM
WM6's Avatar
WM6 WM6 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Borovnica, Slovenia
Posts: 2,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMD View Post
The name of the physics book:


"Encyclopedia of Physics" (second edition) by Rita G. Lerner/George L. Trigg

VCH Publishers, Inc.

I not here to prove anything to anyone. Just looking for a little open minded discussion.
I believe you. Impressive work.
But can you put here citation of paragraph where gold frequency is discussed?
__________________
Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-20-2009, 12:20 AM
hung's Avatar
hung hung is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In LRL Land
Posts: 1,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMD View Post
Hi Mike,

Where is the LRL reports page?

Back in the early 90's I did a lot of controlled experients with using a signal generator and various rods . I was using 5 kHz for gold, 8.7 kHz for silver and 4.5 kHz for lead. I used lead because it was cheaper than gold and I had a collection of different sizes.

Before I got into that I bought some land in Oregon, needed a well and dowsed a 30 gpm well in an area with dry wells and that was why the land wouldn't sell. So I bought the land contingent on a good well. The well company said that would drill in a convient spot.

So I believe we as humans have the ability to sense the very small field anomolies in the earths field and elf, frequencies, etc. created by water underground or underground voids.

So with the frquency generator set to a specific freq for gold their is a very small change that our brains can detect and the rods show us.

So that frequency I asked someone to try is one based on physics similar to how a proton magnetometer works. Realted to nuclear magnetic resonance, the nuclear moment for gold is based on theta y over 2 pie for AU (197). Where theat y is e over 2 Mc. Anyway I have an advance physics books that has that calculated for gold and is the frequency I mentioned, 729.19 Hz.

So I was curious if that frequency might have a strong response.

I may sound a bit nuts but I am just curious about all this and believe our brain as a receiver is very much not known what it is capable of.

Frank
Hi Frank,

I see what you mean.

But don't try to 'convert' certain frequencies based on 'supposed Teslas' generated by Earth which comes up with 'checked' frequencies that in theory would respond. These calculations altough correct only for NMR conversions and corresponding magnitudes are completely off for magnetic grid points and dowsing related detection.

Bear in mind that all substances have several and several related frequencies which make up its weight, shape, color, density, etc. So, it's not a surprise, there are so many different frequencies for gold by the way. The several MFD frequencies people report might even be correct in some extent altough some are 'more relevant' than others. This explains why some are sucessful and others are more prone to 'interferences' from other substances and end up with failures.

Regards.

Quote:
I not here to prove anything to anyone. Just looking for a little open minded discussion.
Be careful. People here are anything but open minded...
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-20-2009, 12:36 AM
FrankMD FrankMD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13
Default

Thanks for the response Hung.

Yes is is way more complex than what I wrote. It has also to do with nuclear moments and quantum objects.

It was just that my pysics book specically talked about the 729.19 Hz for gold. If I had a scanner I'd scan the page and so you could see what I'm talikg about in a complete way.

Frank
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.