View Single Post
  #39  
Old 07-03-2009, 01:19 AM
J_Player's Avatar
J_Player J_Player is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurificus
"Plain Common Sense" is always the SIMPLEST answer.

Which part did he destroy?

A) Targets: That changes of of thermal energy in conductors and across semi-conductor boundaries produce electromagnetic effects. ie signals

B) LED Detection: Diode as as a "energy change detector" see above

Aurificus
Hi Aurificus,
The answer is "none of the above".

You provide choice "A" (Targets: That changes of of thermal energy in conductors and across semi-conductor boundaries produce electromagnetic effects. ie signals),

and choice B: (LED Detection: Diode as as a "energy change detector" see above).

But you missed the obvious point that everybody has been telling you from the start:
C) The variations of thermal energy that exist at the surface of the ground are so immense that they swamp any minuscule anomaly from a buried metal object below the surface, so as to make it undetectable.

As was pointed out by more than one member, there is a severe signal to noise ratio problem with the thermal energy theory.
A good analogy to this signal to noise problem might be: "It's as easy as hearing the sound of a pin dropping on the floor of a concert stage next to the drummer playing for a heavy metal band, from 20 meters distance".

Best wishes,
J_P
Reply With Quote