Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
to avoid confusion among viewers I suggest leaving the term "Dowsing," and mind/muscle "ideomotor" response totally out of a discussion of physics, and their effects on Hand held L-Rod(s), lest Skeptics continue to demonstrate their ignorance of these subjects. Swallow your ego's,(don't choke) and decide to become serious about learning, and stop bashing & mocking those who do have at least some working knowledge and show them respect.
That's certainly a joke, that I will see egotists, and pretend scientist posting on Carl Morland's forum who are open minded to learning from a 6th grade
|
Hmmmm... Who are you to lay claim to knowledge about dowsing?
Aren't you another self-proclaimed dowser who refuses to demonstrate dowsing that works to recover targets in front of live witnesses?
I read your previous posts where you assure us you have performed hundreds of double blind tests of dowsing. Yet you refuse to give any information about the details of those tests. Then you call people names instead of presenting the test results from the DB test proctor. Why should we have respect for that?
We read posts from a person who cannot demonstrate dowsing working to recover targets, and cannot substantiate hundreds of alleged double blind dowsing tests performed. Your only test I read about is where you failed to find the treasure. All other references to your testing showed that you refused to allow testing of your methods. Then you expect us all to believe whatever you say with nothing to back up your claims. Isn't that an egotistical expectation?
We must blindly believe all you say, or else you will brand us to be part of the "skeptic cult" and call us names?
Perhaps if you want some respect, you should earn it by backing up your claims.
Why not start by substantiating the double blind tests on dowsing you claim you performed:
Can you tell us the facts about the hundreds of double blind tests you conducted?
To start with, let's focus on a single one of the tests you conducted.
Pick out any one of your hundreds of double blind you want to use for an example:
1. Where was the test conducted?
2. Who was the proctor?
3. What was the protocal of this double blind dowsing test?
4. What was the object of the double blind test? A gold item? a silver item? something else?
5. Was the operator aware of any results before the test was fully completed?
6. What were the results?
Best wishes,
J_P