Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player
Is it an idiotic question? Aren't readers of this forum interested in reading the details of a double blind test that proves dowsing works once and for all?
We have Dell's word that he conducted hundreds of double blind tests on the use of dowsing rods. But when asked to tell us some details of his double blind tests, he says I am wasting his time with idiotic questions.
It seems to me that skeptics, dowsers and the undecided would like to see the details of Dell's hundreds of double blind tests, so they can know once and for all that it works, or it doesn't. Since Dell never lies, we can be assured that Dell did not cheat on the double blind testing methods or results that were determined by the proctor. Yet he refuses to give any information about the double blind tests he conducted.
How can Dell tell people "You are wallowing in your own egotistical stupidity" when he refuses to post his double blind test details so all of us can read the results that were determined by the proctor? The double blind test results would verify the whether there was some egotistical stupidity or not.
Is it possible that Dell did lie?
Is it possible that Dell never conducted any double blind tests?
Best wishes,
J_P
|
Are you sure these questions are not rhetorical?
Dell has no intention of answering any of these, simply because he cannot give a sensible response that doesn't involve name calling.