Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ivconic
I didn't knew that, really. But i can accept that. Usuallly i am having conventional knowledge (laic you may say) on subjects out of my primary focus.
Originally posted by Qiaozhi
Therefore the conclusion is that a column of ions hovering in the air above a gold target is nonsense, and (even if any gold ions present were not bound by the soil) their numbers would be so few as to be undetectable at any distance, let alone several meters.
|
Yes, I concluded many years ago that there is no ion column floating 7.2 feet in the air above the treasure. This is pseudoscience that can be proven to be false.
The source of this false information is the Mineoro website, probably written by Damasio or by Alonso. After reading all they have published on their website, I find it interesting they correctly concluded that ions move upward through the soil in a column pattern. I doubt they discovered this information by performing chemical analyses on soil saamples, but deduced that this must be happening based on their LRL and/or dowsing experiments. I also see a number of errors in their theories about mechanisms of long time buried metals, which also appear to have been arrived at by deducing things that appeared to be correct at the time, and with the tools they had at hand.
The idea that the gold ions rise 7.2 feet above the surface may be based on their ability to sense some effect of the "phenomenon" at that distance in the air. What comes to mind is they may be finding an anomaly in the electrostatic field in the air at that distance. Or it may be some other attribute of ionic activity below the surface of the soil that can be sensed in the air above. But it is certain that there is no cloud of hovering gold ions above the target area.
From what I have read, scientists in Australia first bagan to notice this column pattern of metal ions in the 1970s. After more than a decade of studying the mechanism, they funded a commercial branch to develop testing methods that would pinpoint deposits of gold and other industrial metals. The mobile metal ion testing is also used for surveying for minerals that are important for agricultural industries.
The conclusions about ions moving under the ground published by the Mineoro website are the same as the conclusions published by the mobile metal ion testing laboratories. What is different with the mobile metal ion testing laboratories is their conclusions are based on empirical data they observed in test results, not deductions they assumed were correct. Perhaps this is the reason they did not make the error of assuming there are ions hovering 7.2 feet in the air above the ions in the soil.
Best wishes,
J_P