View Single Post
  #111  
Old 06-04-2009, 02:02 PM
J_Player's Avatar
J_Player J_Player is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivconic
Yes fellas, Esteban is right. Don't let this turn into spittin' arena. Better use same energy on pro et contra facts on this subject.
Ok, back to the facts on subject of this thread: Quaozhi's discussion of the DNA of gold.

I must admit, I am skeptical about the existence of gold DNA, or a substance it produces that protects gold against rust, corrosion, etc. After searching every detail I could think of that might lead to information about the DNA of gold, I came up with nothing.

Does gold have DNA?
DNA is a nucleic acid that contains the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms and some viruses. As far as I know, gold has never been alive, and has no cells or cell nuclei. Thus it cannot produce any organic acids that store genetic data, nor can the non-existent gold DNA produce any other substances that would protect gold from rust, oxidation, etc.

But hung maintains it is true, gold does have DNA, but he is not interested in explaining anything about it. This leads me to wonder why hung would say this in the first place when he has no interest in explaining anything to back up his claim?
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player
Can you explain your own ideas and experiences with gold that might convince Qiaozhi or the rest of us forum readers that gold has DNA that produces a substance to protect it?

Originally posted by hung
This is a private survey I'm involved.
I have absolutely no interest whasoever in discussing it or convincing anyone about it. But even if I did have... no, I beleive I would not be able to convince you or some skeptics here and I doubt it that I would ever be.
Too many other aspects involved which 'conventional' science still has no data. Sorry.
Gotta go now.
I can only speculate that this is part of hung's "debunkering" campaign to post his correct information in this forum when he sees people believing wrong science. Or perhaps the meaning was lost between the time hung thought of his idea of gold DNA, and when he debunkered in the forum. Maybe some alternate translations of what hung was thinking are in order...

Possible translations of hung's answer:
1. Hahahahaaa I was able to get away with posting that gold DNA crap by using the old "secret research BS" trick.
2. If I told anyone about the gold DNA I saw with the electron microscope that I built from kitchen utensils and an old Mr, Coffee pot, they still wouldn't believe me.
3. Somebody in Myron Evans forum said gold has DNA. This pretty much proves gold has DNA. Too bad I can't reveal any secret information I learn in the Myron Evans forum.
4. Hmmmm... I looked everywhere for gold DNA, but I can't seem to find it. Note to self: Next time I make up some science and tell people it is a fact, first check online to see if I can find someone who agrees with me.

Not sure if my translations are correct or not.

Best wishes,
J_P
Reply With Quote