Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Esteban
I say "we" because no learning in "very" scientific materials. The most are pressumptions... of course based on characteristics of metals as conductivity...
|
The scientists made no presumptions when they took soil samples and used chemicals titrations and very precise calibrated electronic instruments to detect the presence of metal ions. These were observed results, not presmptions. They made no presumptions when they observed these metal ions are no longer ions at the surface. They measured the weight of metal compounds that they found, and the absence of metal ions at the surface or above, unlike the presence of metal ions they measured and observed taking column shapes below the surface.
Are you sure they presumed these ions are located in the columns where they claim they measured them? Are you sure they were presuming there is not a metal ion anomaly at or above the surface when their tests failed to find any metal ions above the surface?
Best wishes,
J_P